Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

State of NCT of Delhi v. Dinesh Kumar Jain

28 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10560
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that prolonged inaction and lack of sufficient cause preclude condonation of delay under Order IX Rule 13 CPC and Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant ex-parte decree Order IX Rule 13 CPC condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act 1963

The Bhajanpura Co-operative Urban Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. v. The Registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors.

28 Nov 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:10629-DB

The Delhi High Court clarified the registration requirements for mortgage deeds by deposit of title deeds, quashed the Cooperative Tribunal's order for non-application of mind, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

civil other Significant Mortgage by deposit of title deeds Registration Act, 1908 Section 17 Registration Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Arvind v. Union of India & Anr.

27 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10121-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed an application to correct a typographical error and formally record the allowance of additional documents in its earlier judgment.

other other Procedural typographical error correction of judgment additional documents procedural order

CSJ Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Mr. Akash Kohli & Anr.

27 Nov 2025 · Tejas Karia, J.

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's rectification petitions and ordered removal of impugned marks identical to the petitioner's prior registered trademark due to mala fide registration and likelihood of confusion.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Rectification petition Prior user rights Mala fide registration

EX. CT/DVR RAJ SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA

27 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10812-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that dismissal for a serious offence does not automatically bar compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of the Pension Rules, granting relief to a dismissed CRPF constable driver.

administrative petition_allowed Significant compassionate allowance dismissal from service Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Rule 41

M/S POURING POUNDS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. KUZALIN SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

27 Nov 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:10819

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a market agreement containing a valid arbitration clause.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 12(2) Appointment of Arbitrator

Amandeep Singh Proprietor, Guru Kripa Enterprises v. Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 10 (1)

27 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:10734-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of reassessment notices issued under the amended Income Tax Act provisions, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to multiple notices and procedural objections.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act Section 148A Income Tax Act reassessment proceedings reason to believe

Master Janmesh Sagar v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

27 Nov 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:10775

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of selection-based admission tests at Class VI in CM SHRI Schools, holding that Section 13 of the RTE Act prohibits screening only at entry level and such tests do not violate Article 21-A of the Constitution.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 Section 13 RTE Act Article 21-A Constitution of India Admission test

Sunil Ahuja & Ors. v. District & Sessions Judge (Hqs) & Ors.

27 Nov 2025 · Avneesh Jhingan · 2025:DHC:10571

The Delhi High Court remitted the petitioners' claim for three advance increments on acquiring an LL.M. degree back to the committee for reconsideration in light of administrative decisions granting similar benefits to comparable court employees.

administrative other Significant advance increments LL.M. degree parity Delhi District Courts

Champion Project Enterprises v. Union of India

27 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10690-DB

The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn upon the appellants' request to discontinue the proceedings.

other appeal_dismissed Procedural appeal withdrawal leave to withdraw appeal dismissal of appeal procedural order

M/S EVES FASHION v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

27 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10599-DB

Delhi High Court allowed restoration of GST registration despite delay and cancellation, emphasizing bona fide intention and exceptional hardship to permit late filing of returns with fees and interest.

tax petition_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation restoration Section 39 CGST Act

Justwork Technologies Private Limited v. Sales Tax Officer/Class II STO, DGST & Anr.

27 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10586-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order passed without hearing the petitioner, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

Union of India and Another v. Neeraj Seth

27 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10585-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing consideration of a candidate's answers despite minor numbering errors in the examination, dismissing the petition challenging promotion benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed Limited Departmental Competitive Examination answer sheet numbering error Central Administrative Tribunal promotion

Rajat v. The State

27 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:10728

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a second FIR alleging dowry harassment and rape, holding that it was based on distinct facts from an earlier FIR and was maintainable.

criminal petition_dismissed quashing of FIR Section 482 Cr.P.C duplicate FIR dowry harassment

Sagar Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10590-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim relief against termination of service for non-disclosure of an FIR, emphasizing that interim relief in termination cases is generally not granted to avoid usurpation of public office and directing expedited final adjudication.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant interim relief termination of service Central Civil Services (Temporary Services) Rules, 1965 FIR non-disclosure

Staff Selection Commission v. Gaurav Rana

27 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10010-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination, holding that consistent medical board findings in recruitment cannot be disregarded merely due to divergent reports from other hospitals.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical examination recruitment Detailed Medical Examination Board Review Medical Examination Board

Sunita Bansal and Anr v. Rajan Bansal

27 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10635-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that res judicata and ownership claims require evidence and cannot be decided at the threshold.

civil appeal_dismissed Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejection of plaint res judicata Hindu Succession Act 1956

United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Chandrawati

27 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan

The Delhi High Court modified a motor accident compensation award by applying Uttar Pradesh minimum wages for loss of dependency, enhancing medical expenses based on credible payment proof, and awarding loss of consortium, thereby reducing the total compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim loss of dependency minimum wages medical expenses reimbursement

Mritunjay (Legal Cell) Air Force v. GP Capt Ashutosh Vyas Retd

27 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired Air Force officer, affirming the presumption that disabilities not recorded at entry are attributable to service unless rebutted by positive medical evidence.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces attributable to service idiopathic disease

Mr. Aniruddha Ghosh v. Daya Ram

27 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10682-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order granting pay scale and pension revision to a retired employee treated as a direct recruit, rejecting the government’s belated attempt to reclassify his appointment as promotional.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant ACP Scheme MACP benefits pay scale revision promotional post