Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Union of India and Ors. v. Ex Sgt Satyavir Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption of service connection absent employer's proof to the contrary and limiting writ interference to errors of law.
Major Anish Murlidhar v. Col Anirudha Nath
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent contrary proof and limiting its review to errors of law.
Mukesh Khanna v. Des Raj Jewellers
The High Court held that review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is limited and cannot be used to reappraise evidence or substitute the original order, setting aside the review allowed by the Additional Rent Controller and restoring the eviction order.
Kavita Devi v. Baljeet Singh
The Delhi High Court enhanced the maintenance awarded to a wife under Section 125 CrPC after correctly assessing the parties' incomes and reaffirming the husband's absolute duty to maintain his wife regardless of her earning capacity.
Namit Arora & Anr. v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of non-executive nominee directors in a corporate fraud case, holding that sufficient material existed to proceed and that exoneration by other agencies did not bar prosecution.
Mandava Ashapriya v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that no novation occurred to extinguish the original loan debt, validating the dishonoured post-dated cheques and upholding criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act, while partially discharging a non-executive director for lack of specific allegations.
Akasaki Technology (P) Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
The High Court held that jurisdictional issues regarding the validity of an assessment order under Section 144 must be decided by the appellate authority before remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer, setting aside the ITAT and CIT(A) orders and remanding the case for fresh adjudication.
Appellant v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a stepfather for repeated sexual assault of his minor stepdaughter, affirming that a child victim's consistent statements and corroborative medical evidence suffice to sustain conviction despite hostile cross-examination and absence of forensic evidence.
Orient Green Power Company Ltd. v. SM Milkose Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing the petitioner to pay Rs. 2.50 crores plus interest, dismissing the challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and rejecting the petitioner’s counterclaim as barred by limitation.
E.S. Nathan v. Canara Bank
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a bank employee for unauthorized fund transfers, holding that the disciplinary inquiry was fair, the admission statement valid, and the court's role limited to ensuring procedural compliance without reappreciating evidence.
Anu Duggal v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of investigation into Arnav Duggal's death to the CBI, holding the police investigation was not mala fide and the death was supported by medical evidence as suicide.
Sarwar Raza v. Ombudsman Reserve Bank of India
The Delhi High Court directed Citibank to refund disputed fraudulent credit card charges without penalties, held the bank responsible for recovery agents' harassment, and mandated RBI to strengthen Ombudsman complaint handling to protect consumers from unauthorized electronic banking transactions.
Shashi Oberoi v. Yashpal Chawla
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of an eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, holding that the petitioner failed to prove bona fide requirement due to concealment of alternative accommodation and contradictory evidence.
Sunil Madan Mandhan v. The State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the probate of a Will executed by the Testator, rejecting the appellant's allegations of forgery and undue influence due to lack of credible evidence.
Hitesh Sharma & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Surender Basoya v. Sanjeev Joon
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a Sale Deed due to dishonour of post-dated cheques, affirming the suit as commercial and dismissing the appeal challenging the decree for recovery, possession, and injunction.
M/S Fire Immune Systems v. M/S Elesco Traders Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's decree for possession and mesne profits, holding that a suit instituted by a company Director is maintainable, landlord-tenant relationship was proved, and a fresh suit after return of plaint is permissible when a subsequent cause of action arises.
Sanjay Aggarwal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that investigation and attachment proceedings under the PMLA are not barred by SFIO jurisdiction under the Companies Act, and a Provisional Attachment Order can be validly issued without a prior chargesheet if supported by sufficient material.
CYBERSEC INFORMATICS v. AVION NETWORK
The High Court allowed the petitioner an opportunity to file a Written Statement to the amended plaint and held that framing additional issues is within the trial court's discretion.
Kanchan Saini & Anr. v. Shiv Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order permitting the respondent to file newly created ownership documents during trial despite delay, dismissing the petitioners' challenge.