Delhi High Court

29,474 judgments

Year:

Anjar Ali Khan and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

28 Nov 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:10764-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the 2013 MHA Guidelines barring recruitment and retention of color blind personnel in CAPFs and dismissed writ petitions challenging termination of probationers found medically unfit due to defective color vision.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant color blindness probation termination 2013 Ministry of Home Affairs Guidelines

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/s Mirage Homes Pvt. Ltd.

28 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar V. Kameswar Rao · 2025:DHC:10621-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal holding that no additions under Section 153A can be made in completed assessments without incriminating material found during search, affirming Supreme Court precedent.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153A Income Tax Act incriminating material search and seizure completed assessment

Reena Yadav v. Indian Council of Social Science Research

28 Nov 2025 · Avneesh Jhingan · 2025:DHC:10672

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the eligibility criteria and rejection of candidature in a research assistant director recruitment, holding that courts will not interfere with expert selection committees absent arbitrariness or mala fide.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant eligibility criteria selection process judicial review Master's Degree

Ankur Tiwari & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

28 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10632

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Vatsala Khanna v. Ashish Khanna

28 Nov 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:10652

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Family Court's closure of cross-examination rights due to counsel's illness and procedural delays, emphasizing the need to prevent abuse of process and uphold judicial discipline.

family petition_dismissed cross-examination Section 227 CPC Section 151 CPC Indian Evidence Act Sections 137 and 138

Ram Singar Singh v. State

28 Nov 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:10558-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on direct eyewitness testimony corroborated by forensic evidence, dismissing claims of false implication and insufficient proof.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder direct evidence circumstantial evidence extra judicial confession

Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Smt Munni Lata & Ors

28 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10669
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the insurer's liability for a fatal accident caused by negligent parking of a stationary vehicle, rejected contributory negligence of the deceased, and modified the compensation award in accordance with Supreme Court guidelines.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim negligence contributory negligence compensation

M/S Charms Cards Pvt Ltd v. Vinod Kanwar & Ors.

28 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10552

The Delhi High Court allowed the employer’s appeal and set aside the compensation awarded under the Employee’s Compensation Act due to lack of credible evidence and admissions negating the occurrence of the accident and employment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 compensation claim employment accident

Chetan Goyal and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

28 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10593

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Ram Baran and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr

28 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10592

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Rajesh Kumar Singh & Ors. v. Lokpal of India

28 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:10574-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the Lokpal's order and notices for failing to afford a mandatory hearing before forming a prima facie opinion under Section 20(3) of the Lokpal Act, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural safeguards and judicial restraint.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 Section 20(3) Preliminary Inquiry Principles of Natural Justice

Gaurav v. The State of NCT Delhi

28 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10642

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding that serious prima facie allegations and material against him warranted denial of bail despite parity with a co-accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 302 IPC Section 27 Arms Act murder

Jagdeep @ Sonu v. State of NCT of Delhi

28 Nov 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:10656

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail under MCOCA for an accused with serious criminal antecedents and prolonged abscondence, holding that the stringent statutory conditions for bail were not met.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant MCOCA bail under special statute continuing unlawful activity organised crime syndicate

Ishwar @ Pandit v. State of NCT of Delhi

28 Nov 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:10655
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to a MCOCA-accused after over nine years of pre-trial detention, emphasizing the constitutional right to a speedy trial over stringent statutory bail conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant MCOCA bail speedy trial Article 21

Bakliwal Holdings Private Limited v. Union of India

28 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for assessment years 2011-12 to 2016-17 as barred by the six-year limitation period under the old regime, relying on the proviso to Section 149(1)(b).

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(b) Section 148A(d)

Dineet v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

28 Nov 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:10597

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail application in a murder case, holding that credibility of witnesses and contradictions in evidence cannot be examined at the bail stage, especially in serious offences under Section 302 IPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail Section 302 IPC hostile witness prima facie case

Govt. of NCTD v. Devender Singh

28 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10553-DB

The Delhi High Court held that termination of a probationary police constable under Rule 5(1) CCS (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965, on grounds of unsuitability without departmental inquiry is a termination simpliciter and not punitive, thus not attracting Article 311(2) protections.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant termination simpliciter probationer termination Rule 5(1) CCS Temporary Service Rules 1965 Article 311(2) Constitution of India

Sandeep Kumar v. Kaptain Singh Rathi

28 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:10600

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court’s closure of defendant’s evidence after repeated adjournments and false settlement claims, emphasizing limited scope of interference under Article 227 and the need to maintain judicial decorum.

civil petition_dismissed Section 151 CPC Article 227 Constitution of India closure of evidence reopening evidence

Ex. Const/CISF Sushil Kumar v. UOI & Ors.

28 Nov 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:10675-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging removal from CISF service, holding that disciplinary proceedings were fair, evidence-based, and judicial review does not permit reappreciation of evidence.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings CISF Rules 2001 Article 226 Constitution of India natural justice

Robin v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

28 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10627

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and criminal proceedings under BNS based on a voluntary amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC in the interest of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences