Delhi High Court
102,337 judgments
Through: Mr. Akshay Ringe, Ms. Megha Mukerjee, Mr. Suyash Darade, Mr. Ravi Sharma Advocates v. JUDO FEDERATION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court directed the Judo Federation of India to conduct elections and amend its constitution in compliance with the National Sports Governance Act, 2025, ensuring orderly transition to a democratically elected governing body.
Through: Mr. Atul Kumar, Mr. Ashutosh Kumar & Mr. Aatrayi Das, Advs v. JASWINDER SINGH & ORS
The Delhi High Court permitted a lessee to surrender leased premises and be discharged from further rent liability due to the Managing Partner's severe medical incapacity, subject to conditions including peaceful possession and clearance of dues.
Mob: 9810149006 Email: sehgalbhuvanesh@gmail.com v. LATE SH RAMESH CHAND SHARMA AND ORS. .....Judgement Debtors
The Delhi High Court clarified that a valid relinquishment deed by a co-owner effectively transfers their share, modifying the distribution of sale proceeds in execution of a final property decree.
Through: v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
The court held that third parties dispossessed in execution of Rent Controller decrees have a statutory remedy under Order XXI Rule 99 CPC to challenge such dispossession before the Executing Court.
Through: Ms. Ritika Mitra, Adv v. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that summons served via email and WhatsApp constitute valid service, and dismissed the appellant's delayed appeal against an ex parte decree in a commercial suit for want of condonation of delay.
Through: Mr. Vikas Sethi, Mr. Chitresh Mittal and Ms. Vaishali Chaudhary, Advocates v. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment of arbitrator due to an inordinate delay of over two years in re-filing without credible justification, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines and the necessity of bona fide explanations for condonation of delay.
Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal, Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Ms. Shruti Manchanda, Mr. Vibhor Sethi and Mr. Mankaran Singh, Advs v. CHACHA CLOTH HOUSE
Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted interim injunction restraining respondent from using the mark "CHACHA CLOTH HOUSE," holding that the dominant feature "CHACHA" in both marks creates a prima facie case of trademark infringement.
Through: Mr. Shivanshu Bhardwaj, Adv v. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a constable and refusal of compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of the CCS Rules, emphasizing that such allowance is discretionary and cannot be granted absent special consideration.
M/S RCC INFRAVENTURES LTD. & ORS v. M/S. DMI FINANCE PVT. LTD. & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that a substitute arbitrator can be appointed under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration Act after recusal, rejected contempt proceedings against the petitioners, and imposed costs for conduct causing delay.
Through: Mr. K.S. Rana with Mr. Pradeep Kumar and Mr. S.S. Rawat, Advocates with v. STATE GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Agrawal and Mr. Abhisek Singhvi, Advs v. ACIT CIRCLE 60(1) NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of deduction for duty drawback under Section 80-IC but remanded the matter to allow deduction of excise and customs duties paid on raw materials from duty drawback, ensuring consistent tax treatment.
Through: Mr. Hariom, Ms. Preeti, Mr. Ashu Gupta, Ms. Ruby, Advs v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (THROUGH SHO)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused involved in a cheating and impersonation case, holding that prima facie evidence and the serious nature of the offence precluded bail at the initial trial stage.
Through: Ms. Saumya Tandon and Mr. Gaurav Singh Sengar, Advs v. GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS
The Delhi High Court directed completion of the street vendor survey within three months, allowed the petitioner to vend as a mobile vendor pending issuance of Certificate of Vending, and held that demolition was not established to have been done by MCD.
Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, SSC with Mr. Shivendra Singh, JSC, Mr. Yojit Pareek JSC & Mr. Surya Jindal, Adv v. JINDAL SAW LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld that excise duty subsidy received under a government incentive scheme is a capital receipt not taxable under the Income Tax Act and need not be reduced from the block of assets for depreciation.
Through: Mr. Vijay Kaundal, Mr. Nitish Kant Sharma, Ms. Mehak Khurana and Mr. Shashank Mishra, Advocates v. INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court held that interim relief petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act concerning disputes already pending arbitration must be treated as Section 17 applications and referred to the learned Sole Arbitrator for adjudication.
Sharma, Ms. Mehak Khurana, Mr. Shashank Mishra and Ms. Radhika, Advocates v. INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court directed that interim relief petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act relating to disputes pending arbitration be treated as Section 17 applications and referred to the same arbitrator for adjudication.
Through: Mr. L.K. Passi & Ms. Ruby, Advs v. RAM DHARI SINGH
The Delhi High Court held that a Labour Court cannot modify a penalty of removal for habitual unauthorized absence solely based on length of service without finding the punishment shockingly disproportionate under Section 11-A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
PARK, SAKET, NEW DELHI-110017 v. JUDGMENT
The Delhi High Court quashed a GST demand order against a corporate debtor on the ground that proceedings post moratorium under the IBC must be stayed and the authority failed to consider this statutory protection.
Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC with Mr. Syed Abdur Rahman, Adv v. B SRINIVASA RAO & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's interim order restraining postings, holding that transfer and posting decisions are administrative matters not ordinarily subject to judicial interference at interlocutory stages absent mala fide or illegality.
Through: Ms. Zubeda Begum and Mohd. Anis Ur Rehman, Advocates v. MIRZA AZIZ BEG (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's refusal to recall its order and reopen evidence, dismissing the petition for delay caused despite sufficient opportunities to lead evidence.