Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. Tupperware India Pvt. Ltd.

05 Dec 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10917-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals challenging the ITAT's acceptance of comparables for benchmarking royalty payments under transfer pricing for AY 2015-16 and AY 2016-17, affirming the CUP method and comparability criteria.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant transfer pricing Comparable Uncontrolled Price method royalty payments comparability analysis

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Remfry & Sagar

05 Dec 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9183-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision allowing license fee payments for use of goodwill as legitimate business expenditure, rejecting Revenue's contention that such payments violated Bar Council Rules and were disallowable under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant license fee goodwill Section 37 Income Tax Act Bar Council of India Rules

National Bal Bhawan & Anr. v. Khazan Chand & Ors.

05 Dec 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:10950-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the dismissal of a Review Petition and held that the plea of Doctrine of Necessity cannot be entertained at the appellate stage when not raised earlier, emphasizing judicial discipline.

administrative appeal_dismissed Doctrine of Necessity Doctrine of Bias Review Petition Letters Patent Appeal

Union of India v. MWO(HFL) Shardendu Chatterjee

05 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10975-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II as covered by earlier judgments.

administrative appeal_dismissed disability pension Armed Forces Tribunal Diabetes Mellitus Type-II writ petition

Rajendra Prasad v. V. Srinivas

05 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10974-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court discharged the contempt notice and disposed of the contempt petition after the respondent filed a compliance affidavit.

other petition_dismissed contempt of court compliance affidavit discharge of contempt notice contempt petition

Union of India & Ors. v. 1433514 Ex Narain Singh

05 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10976-DB

The High Court dismissed the petition filed by Union of India as not pressed after the petitioners acknowledged the respondent was injured in the 1965 war.

other appeal_dismissed Procedural petition dismissed not pressed 1965 war injury Union of India

Loktantrik Adhyapak Manch v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

05 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna, J. · 2025:DHC:11001

The Delhi High Court quashed the Returning Officer's order rescinding GSTA elections, directing elections to proceed on the existing membership list with provisions for voluntary withdrawal and refund, balancing constitutional compliance and practical realities.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Government School Teachers Association GSTA elections Returning Officer membership list finalization

Abhishek Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi

05 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10939

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to the accused in a sexual offence case involving a minor, holding that serious allegations and the victim's minor status preclude bail at this stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail minor POCSO Act Section 376 IPC

Danish alias PK v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

05 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10937

The Delhi High Court dismissed the applicant's bail plea in a serious firearm assault case, emphasizing the gravity of the offences and the nascent stage of investigation as grounds to deny bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail regular bail Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Arms Act 1959

M/S Indraprastha Gas Limited v. Ambrish Kumar

05 Dec 2025 · Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10933

Delhi High Court set aside Labour Court award reinstating a workman, holding he was employed by a contractor and not the government undertaking petitioner, emphasizing the claimant's failure to prove employer-employee relationship with petitioner.

labor appeal_allowed Significant employer-employee relationship industrial dispute illegal termination contract labour

Suman & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

05 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10910

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

ARCH EN DESIGN v. M/S MUKESH AND ASSOCIATES & ANR.

05 Dec 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:10912-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the appointment of M/s Mukesh & Associates as PMC for AIIMS Madurai, holding that absence of incriminating evidence in the FIR and adherence to JICA guidelines rendered the appointment valid.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Public procurement Tender eligibility Expression of Interest Project Management Consultant

Rakesh v. The State

05 Dec 2025 · Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:10901

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 323 IPC but modified the sentence to the period already served, emphasizing rehabilitation and mitigating factors in sentencing.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 323 IPC Section 34 IPC sentence modification mitigating circumstances

Nirmal Bhatla & Ors. v. State & Ors.

05 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10881

The Delhi High Court upheld probate of a Will executed by an elderly, infirm testator, holding that testamentary capacity and due execution were proved and objections based on incapacity and suspicious circumstances failed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant probate Will testamentary capacity Indian Succession Act, 1952

Clyde Pumps Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:11116-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that an Input Service Distributor is entitled to transitional Input Tax Credit under Section 140(7) of the CGST Act despite procedural delays caused by GST portal glitches, directing the credit to be reflected and distributed accordingly.

tax petition_allowed Significant Input Service Distributor Input Tax Credit Section 140 CGST Act transitional credit

Phoenix Impex v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato & Anr.

04 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10983-DB

The Delhi High Court held that mandatory timelines under the CGST Act for refund claims must be complied with and directed payment of the refund amount along with statutory interest to the petitioner.

tax petition_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit refund claim Section 54 CGST Act statutory timelines

Suhel Khan v. Commissioner of Customs

04 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10982-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court ordered release of a detained gold bar upon payment of customs duty and penalty, holding that detention without issuance of Show Cause Notice within statutory period is untenable under the Customs Act.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs detention Show Cause Notice Section 110(2) Customs Act Section 110A Customs Act

HKX Logistics India Private Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II / AVATO, Ward 52, Zone-3

04 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10903-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication pending the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of related GST notifications.

tax remanded Significant Show Cause Notice Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act principles of natural justice

KRBL Limited v. Fair Food Overseas Pvt Ltd

04 Dec 2025 · Tejas Karia, J. · 2025:DHC:11705
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that it has inherent power under Section 24 CPC to transfer and consolidate related intellectual property suits pending before non-commercial courts with proceedings before its Intellectual Property Rights Division, notwithstanding Rule 26 of the IPD Rules.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24 CPC Rule 26 IPD Rules transfer of suit intellectual property rights

Surinder Kumar v. Rahul Khanna

04 Dec 2025 · Tejas Karia, J · 2025:DHC:11465
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that it has inherent power under Section 24 CPC to transfer and consolidate non-commercial IPR suits pending before subordinate courts with related proceedings before the IPD to avoid multiplicity and conflicting decisions.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24 CPC Rule 26 IPD Rules transfer of suit intellectual property rights