Delhi High Court

29,282 judgments

Year:

ITC Limited & Anr. v. Adyar Gate Hotels Limited

04 Dec 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:10842
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court refused interim injunction in trademark infringement suit due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, emphasizing the need for purposeful targeting and tangible apprehension of future infringement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction interim injunction trademark infringement passing off

Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt Ltd v. M/S G S Berar and Co Pvt Ltd & Anr.

04 Dec 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:10841

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s dismissal of belated amendment applications to written statements after trial commencement, emphasizing the requirement of due diligence under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of pleadings due diligence trial commencement

Shantanu Saha v. Union of India and Ors.

04 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025: DHC:6812-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the GSFC conviction and sentence of a BSF constable for sexual harassment due to procedural irregularity in failing to produce available CCTV evidence, holding it violated the right to a fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant GSFC trial Border Security Force Act, 1968 Article 226 Constitution of India fair trial

Mapsa Tapes Private Limited v. Shiv Naresh Sports Private Limited

04 Dec 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:10835

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff for Rs. 16.77 crores based on clear admissions of liability by defendant no.1, rejecting the defense of contingent payment under an escrow agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC Order XII Rule 6 CPC admission of liability

Naeem Ahmed v. Sheeba Mehfooz

04 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10800

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging refusal of interim injunction in a suit involving a disputed gift deed, holding that relief must be sought in the pending appeal against the dismissal of the original suit.

civil appeal_dismissed interim injunction gift deed possession mutation

Sunil Kant v. Samrat Chander & Ors.

04 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10813

The Delhi High Court upheld probate of a Will excluding one son, holding that the Will was validly executed and the appellant failed to prove prior sale or vitiating circumstances.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 validity of Will burden of proof

Stanlee (India) Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of CGST, Delhi North

03 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10978-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Refund claims cannot be rejected on grounds of alleged excess Input Tax Credit without issuance of a Show Cause Notice under Sections 73 or 74 of the CGST Act, and withholding refunds without following due process is illegal.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit Refund rejection Show Cause Notice Section 73 CGST Act

Dhruv Mittal v. Commissioner of Customs

03 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:10844-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Customs Department to comply with its order releasing detained goods without delay, emphasizing that unfiled appeals cannot justify non-compliance and imposing costs for delay.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Department detained goods release of goods court order compliance

Brij Lal v. Union of India

03 Dec 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:10879-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a land acquisition award on grounds of res judicata, holding that compensation under the 2013 Act is not available after possession was taken post-dismissal of earlier writ petitions.

property petition_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Res Judicata Constructive Res Judicata Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013

Dr Neha Parashar v. National Board of Examination and Anr

03 Dec 2025 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2025:DHC:11326

The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a medical trainee's registration for prolonged unauthorized absence, emphasizing strict adherence to Leave Rules and deference to academic authorities in training matters.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant DNB Leave Rules Unauthorized absence Cancellation of registration Natural justice

Manisha Sharma and Anr v. M/S Olive Exim Pvt. Ltd.

03 Dec 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:11280

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming the landlord’s title and bona fide requirement, and held that prior permission under the Slum Areas Act was not necessary.

property appeal_dismissed Significant eviction petition Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 bona fide requirement adverse possession

Rajesh Kumar Sen v. Union of India and Ors

03 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:11210-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a BSF constable who sustained permanent disability during government duty is entitled to disability pension and ex-gratia compensation under applicable rules and directed prompt payment.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disability pension ex-gratia compensation Central Civil Services (Extraordinary Pension) Rules, 2023 Ministry of Home Affairs Office Memorandum

Kuldeep Singh & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

03 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11050

The Delhi High Court quashed a noncompoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Sections 498A/406 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC inherent powers Section 528 BNSS

Mohd Shuaib & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

03 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10822

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC inherent powers of High Court

Prabhash Mishra & Anr. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

03 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11049

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of amicable settlement and exercise of inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC inherent powers Section 528 BNSS

Union of India & Anr. v. Dr. Dhurjati Majumdar & Anr.

03 Dec 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:11008-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of disciplinary proceedings against a government scientist due to violation of natural justice in ICC inquiry, affirming that ICC reports must be treated as final inquiry reports conducted fairly under Rule 14 CCS (CCA) Rules.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Internal Complaint Committee principles of natural justice disciplinary inquiry Rule 14 CCS (CCA) Rules 1965

Ritu Bhatia v. The State of NCT of Delhi

03 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10994

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 174-A IPC following compounding of the parent Section 138 NI Act offence, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process of court.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 174-A IPC Section 138 NI Act quashing of FIR proclaimed person

Divya Sharma & Anr. v. Shivam Sharma

03 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:11042

The Delhi High Court enhanced the interim maintenance awarded to the wife and minor daughter after prima facie assessing the respondent's income as higher than previously determined by the Family Court.

family appeal_allowed Significant interim maintenance income assessment income tax returns affidavit

Aryan Bajpai v. State of NCT of Delhi; Om Prakash v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Dec 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:11026

The Delhi High Court modified the charge against Aryan Bajpai from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC and discharged co-accused Om Prakash for lack of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant framing of charge Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC prima facie case

Mohar Singh v. Ram Devi

03 Dec 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:11027

The Delhi High Court upheld the Sessions Court's order directing the husband to pay maintenance and provide residential relief to his wife, holding that his sale of the shared household without arrangements for her constituted economic abuse under the PWDV Act.

family petition_dismissed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 economic abuse maintenance shared household