Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Sachin Hans v. Satya Prakash Goyal & Ors.

04 Dec 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:10943

The High Court upheld the denial of disability compensation due to pre-existing injury but enhanced the award for pain, suffering, and attendant charges in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim permanent disability compensation enhancement pain and suffering

Arvind Singh v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

04 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10989

Delhi High Court directed BSES Yamuna Power Limited to grant a fresh electricity connection to the petitioner without insisting on an NOC from other occupants, subject to compliance with formalities and verification of residence.

administrative petition_allowed electricity connection No Objection Certificate lawful resident utility company

M/S Globe Coal Company v. Commissioner of DGST, Delhi and Others

04 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10955-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without explicit notice and reasoned order is unsustainable and restored the petitioner's registration.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration retrospective cancellation Input Tax Credit Section 29(2) Delhi Goods and Services Act, 2017

Ramesh Kumar Jangir v. Commissioner of Customs

04 Dec 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10954-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed the Customs Department to release seized gold items in accordance with the Order-in-Original, exempting the gold chain as personal effect and allowing release of gold pieces on payment of customs duty without penalty.

administrative petition_allowed Customs duty Personal effects Gold seizure Red channel declaration

M/S Ashutosh Infra Private Limited v. M/S Pebble Downtown India (P.) Ltd.

04 Dec 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:10843
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of a valid arbitration agreement and appointed a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a Settlement Agreement and Consent Award, rejecting objections of res judicata and non-arbitrability.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 7 Consent Award

MR KONDRA PRAVEEN v. INDIAN COAST GUARD THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL & ORS.

04 Dec 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:10914-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Mr. Kondra Praveen against the Indian Coast Guard, following the precedent established in Deepak v Indian Coast Guard.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition Indian Coast Guard precedent judicial review

CT GD Ramesh Chand v. Union of India

04 Dec 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10913-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh challenge against termination on medical grounds.

administrative other writ petition withdrawal liberty to file fresh petition termination on medical grounds

Sansar Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)

04 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10945

The Delhi High Court granted pre-arrest bail in a sexual assault case considering delay in FIR, lack of corroboration, and applicant’s cooperation, imposing stringent conditions to safeguard investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant pre-arrest bail sexual assault POCSO Act delay in FIR

Deshraj v. The State of NCT of Delhi

04 Dec 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10876
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a gang rape case due to material contradictions in the prosecution's evidence and improbabilities in the victim's conduct, emphasizing that custodial interrogation was not justified.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail gang rape material contradictions medical examination

Nitin @ Chota v. State of NCT of Delhi

04 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10898

Pre-arrest bail was denied to the accused in a serious conspiracy and death case due to sufficient prima facie evidence and the necessity of custodial interrogation for investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant pre-arrest bail Section 438 BNSS custodial interrogation CCTV identification

MS Pooja Arora & Anr. v. Meenakshi Gupta

04 Dec 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:10900

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order directing maintenance of status quo over disputed property pending final adjudication, where both parties claimed title through registered sale deeds and possession was contested.

civil appeal_dismissed status quo sale deed possession dispute Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Sh Rahul Gautam and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

04 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10850

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of court process in matrimonial disputes.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Gautam Anand & Anr. v. State of NCT Delhi & Ors.

04 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10887

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354(A), 509, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Valani Prateek Bhikhabhai & Anr. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

04 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10886

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 420 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 420 IPC Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement

Rajnish Kumar v. State of NCT Delhi

04 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10884

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 323, 341, 506, and 509 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Tarun Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi

04 Dec 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:10883

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary and amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

M/S KARYAN GLOBAL LLP v. VIVEK KUMAR MISHRA AND ORS

04 Dec 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10855
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order rejecting the petitioner's plea to dismiss a suit alleging forgery of corporate documents, holding that civil courts retain jurisdiction over forgery claims notwithstanding pending NCLT proceedings under Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 430 Companies Act, 2013 NCLT jurisdiction Forgery of documents

BITOO SINGH v. THE STATE

04 Dec 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10899

The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from Section 397 IPC to Section 392 IPC due to lack of evidence of use of deadly weapon, upholding the conviction under Section 394 IPC and partially allowing the appeal.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 397 IPC robbery deadly weapon grievous hurt

Udupi Kasargode Transmission Limited v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors.

04 Dec 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:10897
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court granted limited interim protection to the petitioner against coercive action pending fresh hearing by CERC after remand by APTEL.

administrative petition_allowed interim protection Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Appellate Tribunal for Electricity coercive action

R P Parashar v. MCD and Ors.

04 Dec 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10834-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking retrospective promotion under pre-amendment recruitment rules, holding that acceptance of a consent order for prospective appointment estops such claims and that promotion rights are governed by rules in force at the time of consideration.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant promotion recruitment regulations retrospective promotion direct recruitment