Delhi High Court

Through: Mr. Mayank Rajpal & Mr. Naman Gujral, Advocates v. HIPPOSTORES TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED

Through: Mr. Nachiketa Suri, Mr. Rajkumar Dahiya, Mr. Kashish Aggarwal, Ms. Shubhangi Singh and Mr. Bharat, Advocates v. DEVENDER AND ANR

Ansari, Advocates v. THERMAL ENGINEERS AND INSULATORS PVT LTD

MD SAHID v. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)

RPG CABLES LIMITED v. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD

RAMJUS v. B.S.E.S RAJDHANI POWER LTD

Through: Mr. Vijay Kaundal, Mr. Nitish Kant Sharma, Ms. Mehak Khurana and Mr. Shashank Mishra, Advocates v. INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LTD

Through: Dr. Kapil Goel, Adv v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 43(1)

Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Mr. Sanjeet Kumar, Ms. Shweta Singh and Mr. Shiv Chopra, Advocates v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Through: Mr. Anirudh Tanwar, Advocate v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Through: Mr. Munindra Dvivedi, Mr. Shivam Shuvam, Mr. Naman Sharma, Mr. Ruchir Batra and Mr. Devesh Mishra, Advocates v. THE STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI

Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State with SI Ekta v. SANJEEV @ BABLI S/o Sh. Jawala Singh R/o H.No.385/328, Near Purani Chaupal, Village Rithala, Delhi

W.P.(C) 9509/2021 & CM APPL.29494/2021 v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Ranjan and Mr.Gunjan Kumar, Advs v. C.J. ARORA

Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima and Ms.Megha Sood Advocate v. UNION OF INDIA

F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG & Anr. v. Natco Pharma Limited

The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a clerical error in the name of Senior Counsel in its earlier order, issuing a corrigendum accordingly.

INFO EDGE (INDIA) LIMITED v. PRADEEP NAMDEO & ANR.

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and quashed the registration of the mark "NAUKRIYAN" holding it deceptively similar to the well-known trademark "NAUKRI" and likely to cause confusion among the public.

NVENIA LLC v. Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks

The Delhi High Court set aside the Registrar's order rejecting the trademark application as abandoned for non-appearance without prior notice of objections, emphasizing the requirement of natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

HEINEKEN ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LTD v. VIJAY KESHAV WAGH

Delhi High Court expunged respondent’s copyright registration for an artistic work copying petitioner’s TIGER logo due to procedural lapses and deceptive similarity under the Copyright Act, 1957.

9312275287) v. VIKAS CO OP GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ANR

The Delhi High Court quashed orders ceasing the petitioner's cooperative society membership based on her brother's disqualification, restoring her rights after nearly 20 years of possession and allotment.