Delhi High Court
48,408 judgments
M/S RATNA INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PVT LTD v. M/S MEJA URJA NIGAM PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the arbitrator by one year under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing arbitration proceedings to continue.
M/S OM PRAKASH SURINDER MOHAN v. AIR FORCE NAVAL HOUSING BOARD
The Delhi High Court allowed the joint petition to extend the arbitrator's mandate by one year under Sections 29A(4) and 29A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Lacoste & Anr. v. Crocodile International Pte Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Lacoste owns the copyright and trademark rights in the standalone crocodile device in India, and the defendants' use of a similar device infringes those rights, rejecting defendants' claims under co-existence agreements and jurisdictional objections.
Man Kunwar v. Delhi Building and Other Construction Workers Board
The Delhi High Court held that registration under the BOCW Act can be restored despite delayed renewal caused by administrative hurdles, allowing pension benefits to the petitioner’s deceased husband.
The Commissioner of Police v. Om Prakash
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order setting aside the dismissal of a police officer for misconduct, holding that dismissal without departmental enquiry under Article 311(2)(b) requires valid, objective reasons and evidence.
Shree Bhavani Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 23(3)
The Delhi High Court held that failure to electronically file the audit report under Section 80-IA(7) prior to its 2020 amendment is a procedural lapse not justifying reassessment under Section 148 absent escapement of income.
Vinod Kumar Solanki v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle- 61-1, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a mechanical, blanket approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act without application of mind is invalid, quashing the reassessment notice issued under Section 148.
Ram Niwas v. Principal Chief Security Commissioner and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a substituted penalty must take effect from the original penalty date, directing pay scale reduction to run from the date of dismissal and restoration of pay after the penalty period.
Jai Pal v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the BSF dismissal order due to procedural lapses in recording plea of guilty under Rule 142 but declined reinstatement, directing pensionary benefits and partial back wages.
Daljeet Singh Bhatia v. M/S Karamsar Electronics Pvt. Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of leave to defend in a summary suit, holding that a defence based on a blank cheque as security is a sham and does not raise a triable issue.
Inspector Naveen Kumar v. Sachin Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the factory owner from negligence charges under Section 285 IPC, holding no prima facie case was made out for negligent storage of acid used in an acid attack.
St. George School v. Director of Education & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that unaided minority schools are bound by Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act to implement pay commission recommendations and pay salaries, bonus, and allowances at par with government schools, dismissing the school's challenge to the DoE circular.
Anuradha Kashyap v. Dr Sushil Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant’s delayed appeal challenging the Family Court’s refusal to allow cross-examination via video conferencing, holding that the request was a contrived attempt to delay proceedings.
Satish Babu Sana v. Directorate of Enforcement & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking recall of its judgment upholding the constitutional validity of Section 50 PMLA, correcting typographical errors and affirming reliance on the Supreme Court's ruling in Vijay Madanlal Choudhary.
Alaknanda Steel v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without proper notice and hearing violates natural justice and directed cancellation to operate prospectively.
Raj Kamal Gupta & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Kushal Bhalla & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Saurabh Gupta and Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Transys Consulting Pvt Ltd v. National Highway Authority of India
The Delhi High Court set aside NHAI's order debarring Transys Consulting Pvt Ltd for lack of reasoned consideration of the firm's response, emphasizing the necessity of natural justice in administrative punitive actions.
Dugong International Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Government E-Marketplace to revoke the petitioner's account suspension caused by technical errors, remove defamatory warnings, and consider the petitioner's representation after a personal hearing, upholding the right to due process under Article 19(1)(g).