Delhi High Court

48,408 judgments

Year:

Anthony Watts v. Union of India & Anr.

16 Aug 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:6196

The Delhi High Court held that the Indian High Commission in London’s refusal to issue a No Objection Certificate for repatriation of mortal remains of a person of Indian origin without an OCI card was arbitrary and directed issuance of the NOC, emphasizing uniformity and humanitarian considerations under Article 14.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant No Objection Certificate Repatriation of mortal remains Article 14 Indian origin

Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba v. Tosiba Appliances Co.

16 Aug 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:6178
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba’s trademark rights against Tosiba Appliances Co., finding infringement by the deceptively similar mark “TOSIBA” and granting relief despite partial rectification of Plaintiff’s registrations.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Prior honest user Trademark rectification

Mohan Murti Shandilya v. Bank of Baroda

16 Aug 2024 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:6247

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit for recovery of Rs. 2 crore from their NRE account, holding the transfer was authorized and not illegal under FERA or banking regulations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant NRE Account Unauthorized transfer Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Specimen Signature Card

Om Pal Singh v. Staff Selection Commission & Anr

16 Aug 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:6233-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the disqualification of a CAPF candidate on medical grounds due to LASIK surgery, affirming that medical fitness must comply with Ministry of Home Affairs guidelines prohibiting any visual correction.

administrative petition_dismissed LASIK surgery medical fitness CAPF recruitment visual correction

Ankur Kumar & Others v. Ginni Verma & Another

16 Aug 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:6274

The Delhi High Court allowed tenants leave to defend an eviction petition on bona fide requirement grounds, holding that concealment of material facts and triable issues necessitate a trial.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) Section 25B(5) bona fide requirement

Padamshree Creation Pvt Ltd v. Sheetal Sarees and Anr

16 Aug 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:6472-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the dismissal of a suit due to a procedural defect in the company's authorization, applying the doctrine of ratification to uphold substantive rights.

civil appeal_allowed Significant doctrine of ratification company suit authorization Board of Directors resolution procedural defect

State (NCT of Delhi) v. Rajinder Singh @ Rajinder Singh Madan

16 Aug 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:8451

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal in a bribery case due to inadmissibility of electronic evidence and lack of direct proof of demand and acceptance of bribe.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act bribery electronic evidence Information Technology Act

Anish Dewan; Garima Verma; Ayush Dawar; Rushant Malhotra v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

16 Aug 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7380

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discharge of the accused in a rape case, holding that the material on record did not raise grave suspicion to frame charges despite the prosecutrix's statement.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant charge framing Section 376 IPC rape prosecutrix statement

Narendra Prasad Rai v. Vice-Chairman, Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board and Anr.

16 Aug 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:7065

The Delhi High Court set aside the disciplinary penalty imposed on the petitioner, holding that parity in punishment among co-delinquents must be maintained when conspiracy charges fail due to acquittal of co-conspirators.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings parity in punishment conspiracy charge co-conspirators acquittal

Surender Kumar Sharma v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board

16 Aug 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:6921
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

An officer assigned current duty charge of a higher post without fulfilling eligibility criteria is not entitled to the higher Grade Pay or pay fixation benefits under Recruitment Rules.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Grade Pay Current Duty Charge Recruitment Rules Eligibility Criteria

Gangmei and Surbhi Bagra v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr

16 Aug 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:6197

The Delhi High Court held that the employer cannot alter the service conditions of workmen to their prejudice during the pendency of industrial dispute proceedings under Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, and directed maintenance of status quo.

labor petition_allowed Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 status quo service conditions

Nikita Awasthi v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

16 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6308

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging lawful police enquiry into allegations of forgery, holding that lawful investigation does not violate Article 21 rights.

criminal petition_dismissed Article 21 Section 482 CrPC lawful investigation sexual harassment complaint

Baldev Singh & Ors v. Neha Bansal & Anr

16 Aug 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:6259

The Delhi High Court held that the Deputy Commissioner, not the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, is the competent authority to correct revenue records and mutate land ownership after lapse of acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 mutation Deputy Commissioner

Darshan Dabas v. State (NCT of Delhi)

16 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6300

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding that long incarceration and hostile witnesses do not justify bail when material evidence and witnesses remain to be examined.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 439 CrPC murder Section 302 IPC

Devender Aggarwal v. The State NCT of Delhi

16 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6302

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonour of cheques issued against a cash loan, holding that mere unproven repayment does not discharge the presumption of debt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Presumption under Section 139 Loan repayment

Union of India v. Pradeep Kumar

16 Aug 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:6176-DB

The High Court upheld the CAT’s quashing of a dismissal order passed without holding a departmental inquiry or recording reasons, affirming mandatory procedural safeguards under Rule 14(ii) and Article 311(2)(b).

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Rule 14(ii) Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1968 Article 311(2)(b) Constitution of India Departmental inquiry Commissioner of Railway Safety

Jawahar Lal Deka v. Union of India

16 Aug 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:6189-DB

The Delhi High Court held that recovery of excess payments made over 18 years to a BSF Sub Inspector under the ACP scheme was impermissible due to grave hardship, setting aside the recovery order while allowing pay and pension refixation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant recovery of excess payment ACP scheme financial upgradation superannuation

Sultan Ansari v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence & Anr.

16 Aug 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:6262

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case due to prolonged trial delay and partial recording of evidence, overriding the statutory bail embargo under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS prolonged trial delay

Bajrang Punia and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

16 Aug 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6164

The Delhi High Court restored the ad-hoc committee managing the Wrestling Federation of India, emphasizing mandatory compliance with the National Sports Development Code and rejecting dissolution without proper authority despite international federation concerns.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Wrestling Federation of India National Sports Development Code 2011 ad-hoc committee governance in sports federations

Deepak Dabas v. Central Bureau of Investigation

16 Aug 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:6175
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court granted interim bail to accused Deepak Dabas in a custodial death case due to trial delay from Supreme Court stay, balancing liberty rights with witness protection.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant interim bail right to speedy trial Article 21 witness tampering