Delhi High Court

48,408 judgments

Year:

J Duncan Healthcare Pvt Ltd v. Central Medical Services Society

14 Aug 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:6053-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the blacklisting of a bidder for submitting forged bank guarantees, emphasizing the bidder's responsibility for document authenticity and proper adherence to natural justice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Performance Bank Guarantee forgery blacklisting tender process

Mukteshwer Marbles and Ors. v. The Commissioner (LD) and Ors.

14 Aug 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6098

The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners to ply trades other than marble trade from their allotted plots in Dwarka, holding that DDA's refusal violated their fundamental right under Article 19(1)(g) and lease deed provisions permitting change of user subject to Master Plan norms.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant change of user lease deed Article 19(1)(g) Master Plan for Delhi 2001

Sahil v. The State NCT of Delhi

14 Aug 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:6100

Delhi High Court granted bail to a young accused in a POCSO case involving a minor girl after noting contradictions in her statements and recognizing the legal complexities of consensual relationships near the age of majority.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail POCSO Act minor consent contradictory statements

Nagma Parveen v. Babu Malik

14 Aug 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:6166

The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expeditiously decide the petitioner's interim custody application under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, without granting interim custody itself.

family other Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Section 12 Guardians and Wards Act Section 25 Guardians and Wards Act interim custody

Anurag Enterprises v. Footwear Design and Development Institute

14 Aug 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6293

The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension to the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, allowing it to continue adjudicating the dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitral Tribunal Extension of mandate Section 29A Arbitration and Conciliation Act Delhi High Court

KCC Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. v. Government of NCT of Delhi

13 Aug 2024 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5974

The Delhi High Court granted a one-year extension to the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon the petitioner's request and without objection from the respondents.

other petition_allowed Arbitral Tribunal Extension of mandate Section 29A(4) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Inspector TD Cyril Mimin Zou v. Union of India and Others

13 Aug 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:6134-DB

The Delhi High Court held that height relaxation granted to ST candidates at entry level in CAPFs must also apply at promotion stage through LDCE, allowing the petitioner to participate with relaxation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant height relaxation Scheduled Tribes Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Assistant Commandant

Ruchi Wadhawan v. Amit Wali

13 Aug 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:6007-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted divorce under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, holding that prolonged separation constitutes mental cruelty and irretrievable breakdown of marriage.

family appeal_allowed Significant mental cruelty Hindu Marriage Act 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) divorce

Manoj Prasad v. State & Anr.

13 Aug 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6880

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the petitioner failed to rebut statutory presumptions regarding cheque dishonour and that revisional jurisdiction does not permit reappreciation of evidence.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Presumption under Section 139 NI Act Rebuttal of presumption

Malvinder Kaur v. Director of Education & Ors

13 Aug 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:7072

The Delhi High Court held that an employee with an illegal and void-ab-initio appointment is not entitled to gratuity or pay revision arrears, and a writ of mandamus cannot compel payment of such benefits.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant illegal appointment void ab initio writ of mandamus payment of gratuity

Ramjeet Rathaur v. Bijender Singh & Ors.

13 Aug 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:6044

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation from Rs. 29 lakh to Rs. 50 lakh in a motor accident claim by correctly assessing 84% functional disability and awarding additional damages for future prospects, medical expenses, and non-pecuniary losses.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation functional disability loss of future income

Alufab Ores Private Limited v. Department of Trades and Taxes & Anr

13 Aug 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6260-DB

The Delhi High Court restored the petitioner's revocation application and granted an opportunity to prove existence and respond to the Show Cause Notice, emphasizing the requirement of personal hearing before GST registration cancellation.

administrative other Significant GST registration cancellation Show Cause Notice personal hearing Section 107 CGST Act

Shashi Aggarwal v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

13 Aug 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:6273

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail, holding that bail orders should not be disturbed absent strong reasons such as misuse of liberty or violation of bail conditions.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail cancellation of bail Section 439(2) CrPC Section 482 CrPC

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE v. SMT. OMBIRI & ORS

13 Aug 2024 · CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J · 2024:DHC:6048

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of compensation for fatal accident caused by rash and negligent driving, dismissing the insurer's appeal challenging liability and quantum.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Compensation Negligence

Kavita Arora v. Leptons Designtek Pvt Ltd. & Ors.

13 Aug 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:6286

The Delhi High Court held that the NCLT has jurisdiction to adjudicate allegations of forgery in company disputes and remanded the matter for forensic examination and proper adjudication.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Company Law Board National Company Law Tribunal forgery fabrication of documents

Nishant Tandon v. Commissioner, CGST, East Delhi

13 Aug 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6058-DB

The Delhi High Court directed tax authorities to provide GST documents physically or electronically to a petitioner denied portal access, allowing appellate remedies without prejudice due to delay.

tax petition_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation GST portal user ID access to GST documents Section 73 CGST Act

NUTECH APPLIANCES v. SUPERINTENDENT RANGE-35, CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX & ANR.

13 Aug 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:6074-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to a vague Show Cause Notice and violation of natural justice, directing restoration of registration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax GST registration cancellation Show Cause Notice natural justice

Amit Kumar & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

13 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6066
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Pawan Garg v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

13 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6067

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 498A IPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement

Saleem Khan & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

13 Aug 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:6068

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC