Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Managing Committee Masjid Syed Faiz Elahi v. Delhi Waqf Board
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim order requiring the Managing Committee of Masjid Syed Faiz Elahi to deposit disputed Waqf contributions pending final adjudication, affirming that statutory authorities cannot demand fees beyond legislative authorization but parties may agree to higher payments.
Jaswant Singh Juneja v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-63(1), Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court's Ashish Agarwal judgment does not permit reopening of concluded income tax assessments, quashing reassessment notices issued after an order on merits.
Chris Austin Godin v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the applicant's pre-arrest bail plea in a grievous injury case under the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, emphasizing the severity of injuries and the necessity of custodial interrogation at the investigation's early stage.
M/S PCC Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Airport Authority of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by six months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.
Girdhari Lal Constructions Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court extended the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by six months under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to enable completion of arbitration proceedings.
Deepak Chaturvedi v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that withdrawal of NFFU benefits granted based on draft Recruitment Rules after an inordinate delay in notification is illegal and directed restoration of benefits to the BSF officer.
Satish Chand Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 52(1), Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court’s Ashish Agarwal judgment does not permit reopening of completed income tax assessments on the same grounds, quashing reassessment notices issued post-finality.
Neeraj Kumar Pandey v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that an FIR alone does not justify withholding promotion under the sealed cover procedure unless a chargesheet is filed, and directed promotion consideration of a CRPF officer whose name was kept in sealed cover without chargesheet.
Sikandar Kumar Verma v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte departmental dismissal of a CRPF constable due to violation of natural justice for non-service of inquiry documents and remanded for a fresh inquiry.
Rajeev Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The High Court held that issuance of a cheque revives a time-barred debt under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, making it legally enforceable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and set aside the trial court's acquittal on limitation grounds.
Ram Kishan v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused in an NDPS case due to procedural lapses in sample drawing under Section 52A and prolonged pre-trial detention violating the right to speedy trial under Article 21.
Badakulu Ladu @ Sushant v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner charged under Section 29 of the NDPS Act, holding that reliance solely on co-accused disclosures, CDRs, and monetary transactions without direct recovery is insufficient to deny bail, and procedural defects in sampling must be examined at trial.
Rupi Babbar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside charges against a mother under Section 21 POCSO for alleged failure to report child sexual abuse by her husband, holding that delay due to abuse and threats does not constitute failure to report.
Shankar Hirachand Kadam v. The State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for a step-father accused of repeatedly raping his minor step-daughter, emphasizing the gravity of the offence, prima facie evidence, and the protective mandate of the POCSO Act.
Geeta Gupta v. M/S Nivedan Fin Invest Lease Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that Magistrates must conduct a mandatory inquiry under Section 202 CrPC before issuing summons in Section 138 NI Act complaints against accused residing outside their jurisdiction, and set aside summons issued without such inquiry.
Daihril David Hrailu v. Joint Recruitment Cell Lok Sabha Secretariat Parliament of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that a PwD reserved vacancy cannot be filled by a non-PwD ST candidate and must be carried forward if unfilled, upholding the recruitment rules and reservation principles.
Umesh v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that GST registration cannot be cancelled solely on unsubstantiated oral statements and directed restoration of registration pending proper adjudication.
Antex Pharma Pvt Ltd v. Aadvik Pharma & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of interim injunction in a trademark and passing off suit, holding that prima facie evaluation of defence is essential and exclusive rights cannot be claimed over a commonly used mark.
Prakash Singh Bisht v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration due to non-communication of reasons, restoring the petitioner’s registration and emphasizing adherence to natural justice principles.
Sadhna Kohli v. Sales Tax Officer Class II, Avato Ward 80 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under the DGST Act due to non-receipt and inaccessibility of the Show Cause Notice, directing fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner a proper hearing.