M/S PCC Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. Airport Authority of India

Delhi High Court · 11 Sep 2024 · 2024:DHC:6833
C. Hari Shankar
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 676/2024
2024:DHC:6833
arbitration petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by six months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, with no objection from the respondent.

Full Text
Translation output
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 676/202 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 676/2024
M/S PCC INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vivekanand, Adv.
WITH
Mr. Abhishek Semwal, Adv.
VERSUS
AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent
Through: Mr. Udit Gupta and Ms. Nishtha Goel, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
ORDER (ORAL)
04.09.2024
JUDGMENT

1. This is a petition under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996[1] seeking extension of mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal who is in seisin of the disputes between the parties by a period of six months.

2. It is stated that the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal is going to expire on 11 September 2024.

3. Learned Counsel for the respondent has no objection to the extension of mandate.

4. Accordingly, the mandate of the learned Arbitral Tribunal shall stand extended by a period of six months from 11 September 2024. “the 1996 Act”, hereinafter O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 676/202

5. The petition stands allowed in the aforesaid terms.