Delhi High Court

47,108 judgments

Year:

Kunal Food Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority

13 Sep 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:7542-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the denial of pre-reference and pendente lite interest in an arbitration award, holding that the arbitrator's decision was neither perverse nor patently illegal.

civil appeal_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 pre-reference interest pendente lite interest

Surender Gupta and Anr v. Rajat Wadhwa

13 Sep 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:7362-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the execution order related to transfer charges, emphasizing the pendency of a Section 34 arbitration petition and directing parties to pursue remedies as per law.

civil appeal_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 petition execution petition transfer charges

Satish Gupta v. Rachna Gupta and Anr

13 Sep 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:7099

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for injunction over disputed property ownership and possession, emphasizing the necessity of a declaratory suit when title is under cloud and denying relief due to concealment of material facts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant injunction title dispute possession will and probate

Hari Ram v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

13 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7266

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case holding that separate quantities of contraband cannot be aggregated to invoke the bar on bail under Section 37 and that mere traveling together does not establish abetment under Section 29.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 29 Section 37 bail

M/S. BRAINZTORM TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE v. M/S. V-CONNECT SYSTEMS AND SERVICES PVT. LTD.

13 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7122

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of defendants' application challenging pre-institution mediation jurisdiction, holding that non-participation despite notice does not invalidate the mediation or suit.

civil petition_dismissed Significant pre-institution mediation Commercial Courts Rules 2018 Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC jurisdiction

Parkwood Developers Private Limited v. Hardesh Mehta

13 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7121

Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction to challenge NCDRC orders lies with the High Court of the territorial jurisdiction where the cause of action arose and allowed withdrawal of petition with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.

civil petition_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission territorial jurisdiction

Baby Aayat (Minor) v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi

13 Sep 2024 · ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA · 2024:DHC:7100-DB

The Delhi High Court held that EWS/DG admission eligibility is restricted to parents/legal guardians and rejected admission claims based on grandparents’ documents, dismissing the appeal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant EWS/DG admission policy Food Security Card grandparents eligibility Right to Education Act

Kailash Harijan v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

13 Sep 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:7088-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition for production of missing persons after they were traced and directed medical treatment for the mentally disturbed daughter.

criminal petition_allowed writ petition missing persons production of missing persons medical examination

Master Arnesh Shaw v. Union of India

13 Sep 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:7086

The Delhi High Court directed pharmaceutical companies and the government to ensure transparent pricing, adequate distribution, and timely funding for medicines treating rare diseases, upholding patients' right to health.

constitutional other Significant rare diseases Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy patent pharmaceutical pricing

Harish Singla v. Ministry of External Affairs

13 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7085

The Delhi High Court quashed the Look-Out Circular against a former company director, holding that issuance of LOCs must comply with procedural safeguards and cannot be imposed mechanically without evidence of evasion or non-cooperation.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Look-Out Circular LOC Right to travel abroad Fundamental rights

M/S AUSIL CORPORATION PVT. LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

13 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:7040-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the detention of imported platinum alloy sheets and the imposition of security without recorded reasons or proper verification under Section 28DA of the Customs Act, CAROTAR, and CEPA Rules, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned administrative action.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Country of Origin certificate preferential tariff treatment Section 28DA Customs Act CAROTAR

Aditya Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

13 Sep 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J · 2024:DHC:7076-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Municipal Corporation's permission to install a mobile tower near residential and sensitive areas, holding no proven health hazards or legal violations.

administrative petition_dismissed Ground-Based Monopole Municipal Corporation of Delhi mobile tower installation health hazards

Good Year Security Services R. v. Union of India

13 Sep 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:7075-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Sports Authority of India to decide the petitioner's representation challenging excessive tender eligibility criteria by a reasoned order within two days and stayed awarding the contract for one week.

administrative other tender challenge average annual turnover eligibility criteria Central Vigilance Commission guidelines

AXCESS LIMITED v. CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS

13 Sep 2024 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:7041

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against the Controller's refusal of a patent application, holding that the amended claims were within the original scope and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Patent Amendment Section 59(1) Patent Act Scope of Claims New Matter

VIP Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd v. Rhydburg Pharmaceuticals Limited

13 Sep 2024 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:7042

The Delhi High Court rejected the plaintiff's suit as barred by law under CPC provisions for instituting a fresh suit on the same cause of action after withdrawing the earlier counter claim without liberty to sue afresh.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXIII Rule 1(4) CPC Section 12 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC Order II Rule 2 CPC

Yashika Malik v. University of Delhi Faculty of Medical Sciences & Ors.

13 Sep 2024 · The Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:7051-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to allot a supernumerary medical admission seat to a meritorious candidate wrongly excluded due to administrative errors in verifying her Armed Forces reservation certificate.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Education Concession Certificate Children/Widows of Armed Forces Personnel reservation University of Delhi admission Medical Counselling Committee

Raman Raheja v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors

13 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7821

The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, ruling that disputed defenses and settlement validity must be examined at trial, not at the summoning stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Summoning order Settlement Agreement Director liability

Dr. Alka Aggarwal v. Nagma

13 Sep 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:8804-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an interim order of the Central Administrative Tribunal allowing respondents to continue employment until the next hearing, holding that such interlocutory orders should not be interfered with by the High Court.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Central Administrative Tribunal interim order writ petition interlocutory order

Devendra Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ravi Dutt Sharma

12 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7069

The Delhi High Court upheld the FIR registration against a police officer for obstructing a process server, ruling that prior sanction is not required at FIR stage when acts are beyond official duty and that the Magistrate has jurisdiction to direct such registration.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant FIR registration prior sanction public servant Section 195 Cr.P.C.

M/S KEYA FOODS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

12 Sep 2024 · MANMOHAN, ACJ; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J · 2024:DHC:7067-DB

The Delhi High Court granted a four-month extension to the appellant to vacate the stall, aligning with the Supreme Court's order in a related case, and disposed of the appeal accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Letters Patent Appeal extension of time vacate stall undertaking