Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Ramesh Kumar Yadav & Ors. v. Manan Yadav
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioners' application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint discloses a cause of action and the issues raised require trial.
Union of India & Ors. v. Raman Kumar Mehta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the Union of India, holding that the issue was conclusively settled against them by binding Division Bench precedents.
A. S. Ismail v. National Investigation Agency
The Delhi High Court modified the custody parole granted to a senior PFI leader accused under UAPA, denying interim bail but extending parole duration with State-borne expenses to attend his daughter's wedding.
Farman v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case, holding that mere reliance on CDR without corroborative evidence is insufficient to deny bail under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act.
Rohit Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity ganja case due to prolonged custody and trial delay, holding that procedural lapses in sampling under the NDPS Act do not automatically vitiate the trial or entitle bail.
Pawan Gupta v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the pre-execution challenge to a COFEPOSA detention order against an absconding Nepalese citizen, holding that delay or non-service abroad does not vitiate the order and directing the petitioner to surrender for execution.
Achla Malhotra v. Delhi State NPEF CGHS Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a money recovery suit as barred by limitation, holding that the limitation period commenced from the date of partial refund and promise to pay the balance, and oral requests cannot extend limitation.
National Highways Authority of India v. Guruvayoor Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld its interim order enforcing arbitral directions requiring the respondent to maintain escrow funds and pay Negative Grant, dismissing modification applications despite the respondent's financial constraints and lenders' objections.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Mahesh Agarwalla & Akshaya Mohapatra
The Delhi High Court held that an accused cannot invoke Section 91 CrPC to seek production of documents at the pre-charge stage, setting aside orders directing CBI to supply interception request letters.
DR GEETANJALI AGGARWAL v. DR MANOJ AGGARWAL
The Delhi High Court Full Bench held that orders under Section 12 of the Guardians and Wards Act, though termed interlocutory, are appealable under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984, as they affect substantive rights and the welfare of the minor child.
Disruptive Health Solutions Pvt Ltd & Ors v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the bank's assignment of an overdraft facility to an ARC after the account was classified as stressed loan under RBI Master Directions, dismissing the appellants' challenge and directing them to seek remedy under the SARFAESI Act.
Okinawa Autotech International Private Limited & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that interference with a Show Cause Notice is rare and dismissed the appeal challenging the issuance of a blacklisting notice against a company already de-registered under the FAME-II Scheme.
Vinod Mengwal v. Sashastra Seema Bal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of the petitioner’s medical categorization affecting promotion eligibility, emphasizing the need for a reasoned order on representation.
Ashok Leyland Ltd v. The Commissioner Value Added Tax
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing refund of Rs. 3.5 crore with interest under the DVAT Act, holding the refund claim was not barred by limitation and the respondent acted arbitrarily in rejecting it.
Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. The Commissioner, Value Added Tax
The Delhi High Court held that delayed refund of excess tax under the DVAT Act mandates payment of interest at the statutory rate from the date refund became due, ordering the respondent to pay interest on the petitioner’s refund amount.
Devadarsini Umapathy v. Medical Counselling Committee
The Delhi High Court held that OCI Cardholders who obtained their cards prior to 04.03.2021 may be considered under both Indian National and Foreign National categories for MBBS admission at AIIMS, dismissing the petition challenging the eligibility criteria and upholding the respondents' clarificatory notification.
Mahesh Kumar Sharma & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioners' belated representation against recovery of training allowance and stayed recovery pending decision, without expressing opinion on merits.
The Director General All India Radio and Ors. v. Akashvani and Doordarshan Administrative Staff Association
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal of the petitioners' application and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of recovery of excess pay based on employee undertakings.
M/S. CWHEC-HCIL (JV) v. M/S. CALCUTTA HALDIA PORT ROAD COMPANY LIMITED
The Delhi High Court allowed the decree holder to withdraw execution petitions following settlement, with liberty to re-approach the court and ordered release of deposited documents.
All India Association of Central Excise Gazetted Executive Officers and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The High Court held that the tribunal must consider claims for extension of NFU benefits on merits and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication, rejecting dismissal solely on policy grounds.