Kamal Jeet Suman & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

Delhi High Court · 18 Oct 2024 · 2024:DHC:8049
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
CRL.M.C. 8202/2024
2024:DHC:8049
criminal petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.

Full Text
Translation output
CRL.M.C. 8202/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 18.10.2024
CRL.M.C. 8202/2024
KAMAL JEET SUMAN & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr.Arun Kr.Shukla, Mr. R. K. Dubey, Mr.Naman Shukla and Mr.Yashasth
Shukla, Advocates.
VERSUS
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP
WITH
SI Anoop Singh, PS: Begumpur.
Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate for R-2
WITH
Respondent No. 2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
JUDGMENT
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J (ORAL)
CRL.M.A. 31330/2024
Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.

1. Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No. 0589/2021, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at PS: Begumpur and proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No. 2 along with respondent No. 2 appear on advance notice and accept notice.

3. In brief, as per the case of petitioners, marriage between petitioner No.1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized according to Hindu rites and ceremonies on 23.01.2007. Two children were born out of the wedlock, who are presently in custody of petitioner No. 1. Due to matrimonial differences, petitioner and respondent No. 2 started living separately. On complaint of respondent No. 2, present FIR was registered on 17.12.2021.

4. The disputes are stated to have been amicably settled between the parties in terms of the MoU dated 04.05.2024. The marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 has been dissolved by decree of divorce by way of mutual consent under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act vide judgment dated 08.08.2024.

5. Learned APP for the State submits that in view of amicable settlement between the parties, he has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

6. Petitioners and respondent No. 2 in person have been identified by SI Anoop Singh, PS: Begumpur. I have interacted with the parties and they confirm that the matter has been amicably settled between them without any threat, pressure or coercion. Respondent No. 2 also states that nothing remains to be further adjudicated upon between the parties and she has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties, no useful purpose shall be served by keeping the case pending. It would be nothing but an abuse of the process of Court. The chances of conviction are bleak in view of amicable settlement between the parties. Consequently, FIR No. 0589/2021, under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, registered at PS: Begumpur and proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed. Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information.

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J. OCTOBER 18, 2024