Delhi High Court

46,774 judgments

Year:

Vivek Kumar Saxena v. M/S College Book Store

24 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8372

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s refusal to allow a delayed written statement and dismissed the petition challenging ex-parte proceedings in a commercial suit, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory timelines.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Order VIII Rule 1 CPC written statement ex-parte proceedings

Suman Kumari & Ors. v. National Ins Co Ltd & Ors.

24 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8524

The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claimants' appeal, holding that rash and negligent driving by the crane vehicle caused the fatal accident and remanded the matter for quantification of compensation.

motor_vehicles appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act Section 166 Section 140 rash and negligent driving

Randhir Singh and Others v. Union of India and Another

24 Oct 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8412

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation for agricultural land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act by treating it as semi-urban land with potentiality, relying on adjoining urbanized land rates and statutory principles.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value Indicative Price Policy

Council of Architecture v. AR Bela Agrawal & Ors.

24 Oct 2024 · Manmohan, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:8348-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of a suspension order against an architect consultant, emphasizing procedural fairness and limiting the regulatory body's jurisdiction in contractual disputes.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Council of Architecture professional misconduct Architects (Professional Conduct) Regulations, 1989 natural justice

Rahul Nath v. Registrar of Firms and Societies and Anr

24 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8432

The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable for disputes involving contested facts and pending civil suits, and declined interim relief against gate pass charges levied by a society.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant writ jurisdiction Article 226 disputed questions of fact alternative remedy

PROMOSHIRT SM. S.A. v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

24 Oct 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:8548
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of Trade Marks to renew and restore a trademark registration delayed due to the Registry's failure to issue the registration certificate and mandatory renewal notice within statutory timelines.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Trademark renewal Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 23(1) Section 25(3)

PROMOSHIRT SM. S.A. v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

24 Oct 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:8551
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a trademark proprietor cannot be penalized for the Registry's delay in issuing registration certificates and failure to issue mandatory renewal notices, directing restoration and renewal of the trademark registration.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark renewal O-3 notice Trade Marks Act 1999 Trademark Registry delay

PROMOSHIRT SM. S.A. v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

24 Oct 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:8550
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the Trademark Registry's failure to timely issue the registration certificate and renewal notice does not bar renewal, directing restoration of the trademark registration.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Trademark renewal Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 25(3) Form O-3 notice

PROMOSHIRT SM. PVT. LTD. v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

24 Oct 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:8549

The Delhi High Court held that the Trademark Registry's failure to issue timely renewal notices and delayed registration certificate issuance cannot prejudice the proprietor, directing restoration and renewal of the trademark registration.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Trademark renewal Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 25(3) Renewal notice

M/S. BANS INTERNATIONAL v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) & ANR

24 Oct 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8265-DB

The Delhi High Court held that appeals challenging customs classification affecting the rate of duty lie exclusively with the Supreme Court under Section 130E and dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

customs appeal_dismissed Significant customs classification rate of duty Section 130E Customs Act jurisdiction

DISHA ENTERPRISES v. J S S INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR PVT LTD AND ORS

24 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8415
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that invocation of arbitration is not barred by limitation until the cause of action arises, pending Section 138 NI Act proceedings do not preclude arbitration, and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition Limitation period Cause of action

IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd v. Poonam Sharma

24 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8885
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld driver’s negligence, accepted deceased’s income and age evidence, added future prospects, and enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim appeal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim negligence future prospects loss of dependency

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- 2, Delhi v. M/S. Burberry India Pvt. Ltd.

24 Oct 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:10240-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s decision that the Resale Price Method is the most appropriate method for benchmarking import of finished goods by a routine distributor without value addition, dismissing the Revenue’s appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Resale Price Method Transfer Pricing Arms Length Price International Transaction

Gopal Mohan Atri v. Union of India & Ors.

24 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8250-DB

The Delhi High Court partially allowed the writ petition challenging adverse Confidential Reports of an Army officer, holding that inconsistent partial expunctions were impermissible and directing reconsideration of promotion and course nomination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Confidential Reports Army Ordnance Corps Judicial Review Article 226

Vijay Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

24 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8316-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the ITBP transfer order, holding that judicial interference is unwarranted when the competent authority has duly considered and rejected the medical grounds representation.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer posting medical category ITBP judicial interference

Jagpal Singh Shekhawat v. Union of India

24 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8276-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for increments in light of relevant Supreme Court decisions and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks.

administrative petition_allowed increment service benefits Article 226 Supreme Court decision

Rajeshwar Tyagi v. Union of India & Anr.

24 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8274-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim for increments in light of relevant Supreme Court decisions within eight weeks and pass a reasoned order, allowing the petition.

administrative petition_allowed Article 226 increments Supreme Court decision time-bound consideration

M /S GE CAPITAL EUROPEAN TREASURY SERVICES LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 1 3 1, NEW DELHI & ORS.

23 Oct 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:8216-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act extinguishes claims for statutory interest under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act but directed payment of interest for delay in refund release.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 Section 244A Income Tax Act statutory interest tax refund delay

Union of India v. EX HFL Nathu Ram

23 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8279-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting enhanced disability pension to a discharged serviceman, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless disproved.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension military service Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982 Armed Forces Tribunal

Girish Chandra Joshi v. Union of India

23 Oct 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8226-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for increment in light of a Supreme Court judgment and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks.

administrative petition_allowed Article 226 increment service claim Supreme Court decision