Delhi High Court
46,774 judgments
Kumar Karan v. Usha Rani Sharma
A revision petition challenging an eviction order becomes infructuous and is liable to be dismissed once possession of the premises is legally restored to the landlord through execution proceedings.
Sudershan Kumar v. Suresh Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the bona fide requirement for possession to establish a modern dental clinic was proved and the trial court's dismissal was perverse.
Balram @ Ballu v. Sanjay & Anr
The High Court held that the offending vehicle was driven rashly and negligently despite the injured's suicidal attempt, setting aside the Tribunal's award and remanding for compensation determination.
M/S B.E. BILLIMORIA AND COMPANY LIMITED v. ASHOK KHANNA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking condonation of a 330-day delay in filing a revision petition due to unsatisfactory explanations and inconsistent reasons for the delay.
Divya Bhaskar and Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that B.Ed. is not an essential qualification for Assistant Teacher posts under applicable Recruitment Rules and validated appointments made pursuant to a corrigendum excluding B.Ed. candidates, quashing the DoE's order declaring such appointments null and void.
KAD HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 6 DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that reopening a tax assessment for AY 2015-16 beyond the ten-year limitation period prescribed under pre-amendment law is invalid, quashing the notice issued under Section 148.
The Commissioner of Income Tax v. Zebra Technologies Asia Pacific Pet. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the assessee must be given an opportunity to rebut treaty shopping allegations before invoking Section 263 to revise an assessment order.
ACROPOLIS REALTY PVT. LTD v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1-1, DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act is deemed issued only upon dispatch, and reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the three-year limitation period without valid extension are invalid.
Saddeekan Begum v. Bharati Axa General Insurance Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that rash and negligent driving was proved by credible eyewitness and medical evidence, setting aside the Tribunal's conversion of the claim to Section 163A and remanding for fresh compensation determination under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
Ram Babu Mahto v. Bank of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Bank of India's policy denying subsidised accommodation to officers transferred on their own request, holding that acceptance of transfer conditions precludes entitlement to such benefits.
Ashok Kumar Yadav and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Delhi High Court directs autonomous MAIDS to grant contractual nursing staff pay fixation and allowances from November 2012 as per departmental order, affirming equal pay and rejecting unjustified delay.
Krishan Yad Gaur v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with murder and arms offences, holding that prima facie serious allegations and the gravity of the offence preclude bail at this stage.
Sh Anmol Mehta and Anr v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354, 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, affirming the discretionary power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in minor offence cases.
Pawan Kumar and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and resumption of cohabitation between the married parties.
Ishwer Singh & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354, 506, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.
Devaki Nandan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's claim for increment in light of the Supreme Court's decision within eight weeks, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Rit Ram Sharma v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim for increment in light of a Supreme Court ruling and decide it within eight weeks by passing a reasoned order.
Nishant Kumar Sinha & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order denying continuation of temporary nursing personnel's services beyond contract period, holding that protective directions given were adequate relief.
Ram Niwas v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside retrospective cancellation of GST registration for lack of reasons and violation of natural justice, restoring the petitioner's registration while allowing recovery proceedings to continue with due process.
SMC Nova Estate Private Limited v. Surya Marketing Company
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's closure of the defendant's right to cross-examine and lead evidence due to repeated unjustified adjournments, emphasizing the need for expeditious disposal in commercial litigation.