Delhi High Court

46,774 judgments

Year:

Delhi Development Authority v. Jagdeep Bali

23 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8288

The Delhi High Court upheld consumer forum orders directing DDA to allot a MIG flat to the respondent due to improper communication of allotment and cancellation.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Development Authority MIG flat allotment Consumer Protection Act, 1986 service of communication

R. Kay Fabtex Pvt. Ltd. v. Vinod Agencies

23 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8289

The High Court directed the Trial Court to decide the territorial jurisdiction issue at final arguments, refusing to interfere with the interlocutory dismissal of the jurisdictional objection under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.

civil other territorial jurisdiction Order VII Rule 10 CPC return of plaint interlocutory order

Delhi Development Authority v. Bachhi Devi Through LRs

23 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8290

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a delayed revision petition by the NCDRC, holding that no sufficient cause was shown to condone the delay under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

civil petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay limitation Consumer Protection Act, 2019 revision petition

Harish Kumar Gupta & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

23 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:8228

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 509, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the scope of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of court process in minor offence cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement offences against women

Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board v. Zile Singh Thr Lrs

23 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8291
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court directed DUSIB to hand over possession of a shop to the decree-holder's widow by a specified date and allowed the executing court to issue procedural directions within the decree's scope.

civil petition_dismissed possession execution petition license allotment procedural formalities

Kela Devi v. Anil Kumar Jain & Ors.

23 Oct 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:8292

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for possession due to failure to properly identify the property and reliance on fabricated documents, directing perjury proceedings against the plaintiff and imposing costs.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 3 CPC description of immovable property relinquishment deed perjury

Mukeem Khan v. MIM Trading and Construction Company

23 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8310

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order closing the defendant's right to lead evidence for repeated non-appearance, affirming the trial court's discretion and the need for expeditious disposal in commercial suits.

civil petition_dismissed Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Article 227 Constitution of India closing right to lead evidence commercial suit

Rajesh Jain v. Jitender Jain & Ors.

23 Oct 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:8263
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff’s application seeking judgment on admissions of oral partition, holding that the plaintiff is bound by his original pleadings that the Veer Nagar property is undivided and cannot resile from that position to the prejudice of other parties.

civil petition_dismissed Significant partition suit oral partition Order XII Rule 6 CPC relinquishment deed

Runa Devi v. The State NCT of Delhi

23 Oct 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma

The Delhi High Court dismissed habeas corpus petitions after tracing all missing persons, directing interim custody of minor children with their father and permitting police action against parties who misled the investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant habeas corpus missing persons unlawful detention minor children custody

Court on Its Own Motion v. Zenith Mining Pvt Ltd & Anr

23 Oct 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:8286-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging its order directing filing of a complaint for alleged fabrication of documents under Section 193 IPC, holding that no separate show cause notice was required and the order is not amenable to review.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 193 IPC Section 195(1)(b) Cr.P.C. fabrication of documents false evidence

Subhash Garg v. S K Srivastava

23 Oct 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:8654

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the Rehabilitation Council of India, holding that no wilful disobedience occurred as the Council acted within its jurisdictional limits and appropriately corresponded with State authorities.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Rehabilitation Council of India Act, 1992 Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 wilful disobedience

Union of India and Ors. v. Deepak Kumar Rana

23 Oct 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8282-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CAT order passed on consent, directing completion of appointment formalities within eight weeks, and imposed costs to deter frivolous challenges.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal consent order writ petition appointment process

Navneet v. Union of India and Anr

23 Oct 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:8586

The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a candidate's appointment for failing to meet the mandatory educational qualification of studying Physics as prescribed in the recruitment advertisement for TGT (Maths).

administrative petition_dismissed Significant essential educational qualifications recruitment advertisement TGT (Mathematics) judicial review

Shaloo Gupta & Ors. v. Neeraj Khanna & Anr

23 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8341

The Delhi High Court disposed of a tenancy dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement whereby the tenants agreed to vacate the premises by a specified date and comply with payment and maintenance obligations.

property settled tenancy dispute amicable settlement vacation of premises user and occupation charges

Josh Media Vision Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Information Broadcasting & Anr.

23 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8358

The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to decide the petitioners' representation by a speaking order after personal hearing, keeping impugned orders in abeyance pending final decision.

administrative petition_allowed representation speaking order personal hearing government authority

Sachin Asthana v. Adnan Azam

23 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8359

The Delhi High Court dismissed a revision petition challenging an eviction order as infructuous after the landlord lawfully recovered possession through execution proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Significant eviction revision petition Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 execution proceedings

Suresh Chandra Gupta v. Union of India

23 Oct 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:8355
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition seeking release of seized goods, holding that factual disputes over seizure and custody require separate legal proceedings and contempt is not the appropriate remedy.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court seizure memo release of seized goods criminal trial

CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SURESH KASHYAP & ANR

23 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8239

Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment default disputes arising from a Credit Facility Agreement.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 12 sole arbitrator appointment

M/S ONCQUEST LABORATORIES LTD. v. M/S SDACC HEALTHCARE PVT LTD

23 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8371
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator upon finding a prima facie arbitration agreement and proper service, limiting its role to existence of the agreement without delving into merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator prima facie existence

Jagdish v. Union of India

23 Oct 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8427
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that limitation for filing a petition under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act begins only after apportionment of compensation under Sections 30 and 31, allowing the appeal and remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 18 Section 30 Section 31