Delhi High Court
46,774 judgments
M S Bishambhar Exports Pvt Ltd v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court directed the DRT to expeditiously decide the appeal against the setting aside of an auction sale of property, leaving the parties’ rights open and refusing to interfere at the writ petition stage.
Bhelave Arvind Malchandra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's claim for Disability Pension within twelve weeks in accordance with law, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
EX HC GD BANSHI DHAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court held that a retired CRPF employee not informed about submitting an option form for Fixed Medical Allowance and who did not avail CGHS facilities is entitled to receive FMA for the disputed period, subject to verification.
Anil Kumar Jain & Anr. v. Naresh Jain
In a partition suit, the plaintiff must begin evidence unless the defendant admits the facts and contests entitlement to relief on legal or additional factual grounds, as per Order XVIII Rule 1 CPC.
Babli Pandey v. Mukut Lal Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff one final opportunity to summon an MCD official to prove communications in a decade-old civil suit, directing the Trial Court to facilitate this without causing undue delay.
Gautam Sehgal v. Well Trans Logistics Private Limited
The High Court held that territorial jurisdiction is a factual issue to be decided on evidence at trial and dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of the Order VII Rule 10 CPC application.
Manish Gupta v. National Insurance Company Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional High Court where the cause of action arose.
Dexter Capital Advisors Pvt Ltd v. Serosoft Solutions Pvt Ltd
Delhi High Court allowed limited further cross-examination in arbitration proceedings, emphasizing minimal judicial interference under Article 227 except in exceptional circumstances.
Nitin Jaiswal & Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld pre-arrest bail granted to accused in a disputed share transfer case, emphasizing that bail cancellation requires strong grounds and criminal courts should not act as recovery agents in civil disputes.
Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Mr Jagdish Kumar Sole Proprietor of Hari Ram Dharam Pal
The Delhi High Court held that pre-arbitral dispute resolution steps in an arbitration agreement are directory, allowing appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 despite non-compliance with such steps.
Aurionpro Solutions Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi Transport Department
The Delhi High Court held that pre-arbitral dispute resolution steps are directory, appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, and directed the arbitrator to decide preliminary objections before merits.
Sudarshan v. Sumitra Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree restoring possession to plaintiffs in a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, holding that the defendants failed to prove their claim disputing the identity of the suit property.
The Aryan Educational Society v. Aaryan International School
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to the plaintiff school against a defendant using a deceptively similar mark, holding it to be trademark infringement and passing off in an ex parte suit.
Rashida Bano v. Yasmeen Begum
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the landlord established bona fide need and ownership status more than tenant, and rejected new factual defenses raised for the first time in revision.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 7 v. M/S Paramount Residency Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order deleting addition of ₹7.86 crore disallowed as bogus purchases, holding that sufficient evidence established the genuineness of the expenditure.
CLEAVE CONSULTING NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED v. ROZANA SUPERMART
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve lease-related disputes between parties, directing settlement efforts and compliance with procedural safeguards.
Abhishek and Purnima Vashishtha v. Bureau of Indian Standards
The Delhi High Court held that BIS cannot enforce Service Bonds against employees resigning to join another government-owned enterprise and directed refund of Bond amounts and withheld salaries.
Raj Kumar Raghav v. The District and Sessions Judge, Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court recalled its earlier order, restored the writ petition, and allowed the petitioner to approach the Additional District Magistrate for adjudication while granting interim protection against coercive action.
Satpal Kalra & Anr v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging cheating and dishonoured cheques, holding that registration of FIR is not barred by withdrawal of a similar complaint and that the FIR discloses cognizable offences warranting trial.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Sachin Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination by a Medical Board including a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for Delhi Police Constable recruitment in light of tattoo-related disqualification criteria.