Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Gopinathan T K v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits cannot be directed in contempt proceedings absent an explicit order, but the petitioner may seek such relief afresh before the Tribunal.
Sharma v. Ex Sgt Anil Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Type II Diabetes Mellitus attributable to military service, limiting arrears to three years prior to the claim.
Amrit Lal Yadav & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider petitioners' claim for pay fixation and arrears in light of a prior judgment and decide within eight weeks, without expressing opinion on merits.
Yadav Exhibitors (P) Limited v. Karur Vysya Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone delays in filing and re-filing, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause or due diligence to overcome the limitation bar.
Sivankutty v. Harinder Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's second appeal challenging ownership and possession of a property, affirming that adverse possession and benami claims require clear evidence and that concurrent factual findings cannot be disturbed absent substantial questions of law.
Sh. Ramesh Kumar v. Sh. Balbir Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the 1984 partition of ancestral property was complete and the appellants failed to prove co-ownership or entitlement to partition of the disputed property.
Shanti Devi v. Prem Chand & Jai Bhagwan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the plaintiff failed to prove ownership or possession of the property, and thus was not entitled to possession or permanent injunction.
Bhoora Mohammad v. Khakasha Bano
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal challenging ownership and possession of property, holding that the appellant failed to prove forgery and no substantial question of law arose for interference.
Suncity Hi-Tech Infrastructures Private Limited v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging an FIR as infructuous after the same FIR was quashed in a connected writ petition.
Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate, Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Senior Advocate, Mr. Sumeer Sodhi & Mr. Gaurav Arora, Advocates v. STATE OF N.C.T OF DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR No. 13/2024 registered based on information shared by the ED under Section 66(2) PMLA, holding that the FIR disclosed prima facie cognizable offences and was lawfully registered.
Jackson Square Aviation Ireland Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle Int
The Delhi High Court set aside a Final Assessment Order passed without awaiting the Dispute Resolution Panel's decision on timely filed objections, affirming the mandatory procedure under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act.
Waterotor Energy Technologies Inc v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the deemed abandonment of a patent application due to nonreceipt of the First Examination Report, reviving the application in extraordinary cross-border circumstances.
Bhavya Chabbra & Anr. v. Badminton Association of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the DCBA's selection of mixed doubles players based on aggregate individual ranking points, dismissing the petition challenging the process as neither arbitrary nor unfair.
DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. v. AGHUM BAHL
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused condonation of 166-day delay, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause and affirming the allotment of an industrial plot to the respondent.
Mukesh Nagar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi Acting Through Its Land Acquisition Collector
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking enhanced compensation for land acquired and transferred between public agencies, holding that acquisition proceedings finalized with compensation paid cannot be reopened after 21 years.
Lechamps (SEA) PTE LTD v. Ashish Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held the director personally liable for wilful contempt for repeatedly breaching a Court-approved settlement and undertakings, despite the company undergoing insolvency proceedings.
ADO INDIA PVT. LTD. v. ATS HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED
Delhi High Court allowed correction of a typographical error in the Work Order number in arbitration proceedings under Sections 152 and 153 CPC, holding such rectification permissible despite the Arbitration Act's silence on the issue.
Yashpal v. Neelam Sethi
The Delhi High Court disposed of a tenancy dispute by recording a settlement for vacation of premises with stay of prior order subject to compliance, enforcing undertakings and penalty for delay.
M/S Thread and Needles v. Canara Bank
The Delhi High Court held that a bank cannot retain title deeds deposited as security for a fully repaid loan to recover dues from a different loan account absent an express contractual right, directing release of the documents to the petitioners.
Prof Ram Prakash v. Sheikh Nasim Ahmed
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 20(3) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, compensation can be awarded for delayed restoration of possession even after possession is restored, and rent revision must comply with Section 7(1) limits rather than market rates.