Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Staff Selection Commission v. Gaurav
The Delhi High Court quashed a Tribunal order for failing to apply relevant legal principles to individual facts and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Staff Selection Commission v. Nitin Singh
The Delhi High Court quashed a Tribunal order for failing to consider individual facts and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication applying established principles from prior SSC judgments.
Staff Selection Commission v. Ankit Kumar
The Delhi High Court quashed a Tribunal order for failing to consider individual facts and remanded the case for fresh adjudication following established precedents.
Staff Selection Commission and Anr v. Vishal
The Delhi High Court quashed the Tribunal's order for failing to apply established principles and remanded the case for fresh adjudication considering individual facts.
National Thermal Power Corporation Limited v. Gammon India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for execution of an arbitral award is twelve years from the date the award attains finality, and mere filing of a challenge under Section 34 does not automatically stay execution post the 2015 amendment to Section 36.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Tripta Khanna
The Delhi High Court held that in a motor accident involving two vehicles with no contributory negligence by the victim, liability is joint and several under composite negligence, enhanced compensation including future prospects and multiplier was awarded, and the insurer is liable to pay full compensation with rights of recovery.
The Chairman, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Sanjay Mathur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, upholding negligence of its bus in a motor accident and confirming the compensation awarded to the injured passenger.
SMT. SONIA v. SATISH KUMAR & THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held the bus driver liable for a fatal accident caused by negligently parking the bus without warning indicators, allowing the claimants' appeal for compensation.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. SHALIBHADRA TRADERS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SMT REENA RAVINDRA KHONA AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and refused to examine limitation issues, directing constitution of an arbitral tribunal to decide all objections including limitation.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Rukmini Satish Kumar and Anr.
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan default disputes where parties failed to agree on arbitrator appointment.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Deepak and Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan agreement disputes where parties failed to agree on the arbitral tribunal.
Sheoji Kumar Pathak v. Ajay Suri
The Delhi High Court held DAV College & Management Society to be a public authority under the RTI Act, dismissed its review petition against contempt for non-compliance, and disposed of the contempt application after the information was supplied.
Ajay Kumar Gulati v. State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur (Now State Bank of India)
The Delhi High Court quashed a flawed departmental inquiry and penalty of discharge against a bank employee for denial of defence documents and procedural unfairness, directing reinstatement with pension benefits.
Karnail Singh Cheema v. State
The High Court held that discharged accused cannot be summoned directly under Section 319 CrPC without prior inquiry under Section 398 CrPC, setting aside the trial court's order summoning petitioners without such inquiry.
C.J. Arora v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court quashed a dismissal order and disciplinary proceedings due to the Disciplinary Authority’s arbitrary and unjustified order directing a re-inquiry without furnishing the first inquiry report or valid reasons, violating principles of natural justice.
Vatsal Sareen v. Chander Prakash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a young accident victim by recognizing higher functional disability, awarding future prospects, and increasing non-pecuniary damages in a motor accident claim appeal.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Aarti Gupta and Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement, permitting service by publication and allowing jurisdictional objections before the arbitrator.
M/S ATC FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate pending disputes arising from a terminated rice supply contract, allowing the petition and directing arbitration under DIAC rules.
M/S ATC FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Sections 11(6) and 43(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate pending disputes arising from a tender contract after setting aside a prior arbitral award.
Rajiya Begum v. Rekha & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of the petitioner tenant, holding that the landlord's better title suffices under the Rent Control Act and eviction proceedings are not for resolving ownership disputes.