Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Nrupalbhai Narendrabhai Shah v. State of NCT of Delhi

10 Dec 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:9677

The High Court upheld the trial court’s rejection of the petitioner’s discharge application under Section 227 Cr.P.C., holding that a prima facie case was made out and the matter must proceed to trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 227 CrPC discharge application prima facie case rape

Mishra and Gitika Dixit v. State of NCT of Delhi

10 Dec 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:9678

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR alleging rape and criminal intimidation, holding that a prima facie case exists and inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C must be exercised sparingly after charge-sheet filing.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR prima facie case rape

Rajeev Kumar v. Central Information Commission

10 Dec 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:9674

The Delhi High Court held that a PhD thesis is subject to disclosure under the RTI Act unless clear evidence shows its disclosure would harm commercial interests, and ordered Jamia Millia Islamia University to provide access to the thesis.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Right to Information Act Section 8(1)(d) PhD thesis academic document

Union of India v. Kanwaljit Deol

10 Dec 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9611-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting senior IPS officers parity in apex pay scale with juniors appointed to higher pay scale posts, emphasizing the primacy of seniority and equivalence of posts in pay determination.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant IPS pay scale Director General of Police empanelment seniority equivalence of posts

Amarjeet Singh Chatha v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

10 Dec 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:9649
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that proceedings under Section 340 Cr.P.C. for false evidence cannot be initiated based on unsworn complaints or applications before cognizance and evidence, dismissing the petition seeking such action.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 340 Cr.P.C. false evidence Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Section 200 Cr.P.C.

Angelina Hrang Than San v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

10 Dec 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:9647
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for the petitioner involved in smuggling commercial quantity of cocaine, holding that reasonable grounds existed to believe her guilty under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS bail commercial quantity

Piyush Dahiya v. Delhi Sports School

10 Dec 2024 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:9640
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that mid-process alteration of admission criteria by a State sports school was arbitrary and directed revision of the merit list based on original criteria, upholding principles of fairness and legitimate expectation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant admission process mid-process alteration selection criteria Article 14

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Bharat

10 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9630

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, holding that triple riding without helmets does not constitute contributory negligence and upheld the full compensation awarded for 100% permanent disability in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 contributory negligence permanent disability motor accident claim

Farida Aliyeva v. Commissioner of Customs

10 Dec 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:9533-DB

The Delhi High Court held that personal gold jewellery worn by a foreign tourist is exempt from seizure under the Baggage Rules, 2016 and quashed the Customs detention proceedings.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Baggage Rules, 2016 personal jewellery foreign tourist

Parvez Ahmed v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

10 Dec 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:9530

The Delhi High Court directed the Respondents to convene the Departmental Promotion Committee within three months to fill the long-vacant Vice Principal post, emphasizing the legal obligation to hold DPCs regularly as per DoPT instructions and Supreme Court precedent.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Departmental Promotion Committee DPC promotion vacancy

M S CIENA COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT LTD v. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS IMPORT & ORS.

10 Dec 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:9534-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Revenue Department cannot insist on provisional assessment of imported goods when a CESTAT order classifying the goods and granting exemption is not stayed, despite pendency of a Supreme Court appeal.

administrative petition_allowed Significant provisional assessment customs classification CESTAT order Customs Act 1962 Section 18

Santosh Jha & Anil Kumar Jha v. Salma Deshmukh & Ors

10 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9566

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree restoring possession to the Plaintiff under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, holding that possession, not title, is decisive in such suits filed within six months of dispossession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 6 Specific Relief Act Possession Dispossession Civil Revision Petition

M/S VOS TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD. v. THE PRINCIPAL ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL & ANR.

10 Dec 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:9493-DB

The Delhi High Court clarified the authority of officers initiating Customs adjudication and upheld statutory timelines mandating conclusion of proceedings within prescribed periods, holding that delay alone is not a ground for quashing without prejudice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 28 Proper Officer Adjudication Delay

Madan Pal Gupta & Anr. v. Maya Devi & Anr.

10 Dec 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:9465-DB

The Delhi High Court held that urbanization notifications under Section 507(a) of the 1957 Act render DLR Act proceedings non est only if the notification predates the rights and proceedings, setting aside the Single Judge's order and remanding for fresh adjudication.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 Section 507(a) urbanization notification

Mir Singh v. Union of India

10 Dec 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:9464-DB

The Delhi High Court held that co-owners of jointly acquired land are entitled to equal enhanced compensation awarded to any co-owner, directing payment of enhanced compensation to the petitioners at par with other co-owners.

property petition_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 enhanced compensation co-owners jointly held land

Anuraag Jasraaj Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

10 Dec 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9655-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the opening of the sealed cover and restoration of the petitioner's seniority for promotion after quashing of disciplinary penalty, restraining further promotions until compliance.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant sealed cover Departmental Promotion Committee promotion seniority disciplinary penalty quashing

Gayatri Jain v. Sahil

10 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9644
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that major married children can be considered dependents for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, reducing the personal expenses deduction to one-third and enhancing the awarded compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 loss of dependency personal expenses deduction major married children dependency

Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Naveen Kumar

10 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9643

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the award of compensation for a motor accident victim despite delay in FIR registration and confirming the negligence of the driver and the disability assessment.

motor_vehicles_accident_compensation appeal_dismissed delay in FIR registration negligence functional disability compensation quantum

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd v. Interio International P Ltd & Ors.

10 Dec 2024 · Mini Pushkarna, J · 2025:DHC:56

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunction against defendants using a deceptively similar trademark 'OMRA' on pharmaceutical products, affirming trademark infringement and passing off with costs awarded to the plaintiff.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off summary judgment permanent injunction

Union of India & Ors. v. Amar Rana

09 Dec 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9142-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The High Court quashed a Tribunal order for failing to consider individual facts and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication applying established legal principles.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Tribunal order remand de novo adjudication fact-specific adjudication