Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Vijay Singh Malik v. Naresh Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation awarded for permanent disability and related damages in a motor accident claim, holding that future loss of income requires evidence of actual diminution.
Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Pradeep Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the award of 50% future prospects in compensation to an injured claimant selected for permanent employment but unable to join due to accident injuries.
State v. Ramesh @ Bengali
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a robbery case, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence, the necessity of moving property for robbery, and justifying refusal to participate in TIP when the accused was pre-exposed to the witness.
M/S ATC FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a terminated rice supply contract, directing arbitration under DIAC rules and preserving parties' rights to raise jurisdictional objections.
M/S ATC FOOD PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a terminated tender contract, allowing the parties to raise jurisdictional objections before the arbitrator.
Vandana Kapoor v. Rajesh Kumar Agarwal
The Delhi High Court held that courts must prima facie evaluate both the complainant's case and accused's defence before granting interim compensation under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
State v. Mohd Rashid
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, emphasizing limited scope of appellate interference in acquittals and the necessity of proving foundational facts beyond reasonable doubt before triggering statutory presumptions.
JUST CLICK TRAVELS PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court allowed partial waiver of mandatory pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act for incentive income service tax demand, relying on a Larger Bench CESTAT precedent and exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226 in a rare and exceptional case.
Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd v. Berkley Beauty Brands Private Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a car finance agreement, affirming the court's jurisdiction and the validity of the arbitration clause.
M/S COMBITIC GLOBAL CAPLET PVT LTD v. M/S AMBIKA REALCON DEVELOPERS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under an arbitration agreement and disposed of the Section 9 petition without expressing opinion on merits.
M/S COMBITIC GLOBAL CAPLET PVT LTD v. M/S AMBIKA REALCON PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator and referred the dispute over entitlement under a commercial agreement to arbitration, dismissing the petition for interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. Lt. Col. Manvir Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis and other disabilities aggravated by military service, dismissing the Union of India's challenge.
Anil Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking retrospective seniority and pay fixation benefits, directing the petitioner to approach the Rajasthan High Court for relief.
Pranav Kumar v. Union of India through Ministry of Railways
The Delhi High Court directed the disciplinary authority to decide the pending inquiry within six weeks, refusing to quash the proceedings solely on account of delay.
Gopinathan T K v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits cannot be directed in contempt proceedings absent an explicit order, but the petitioner may seek such relief afresh before the Tribunal.
Sharma v. Ex Sgt Anil Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Type II Diabetes Mellitus attributable to military service, limiting arrears to three years prior to the claim.
Amrit Lal Yadav & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to consider petitioners' claim for pay fixation and arrears in light of a prior judgment and decide within eight weeks, without expressing opinion on merits.
Yadav Exhibitors (P) Limited v. Karur Vysya Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone delays in filing and re-filing, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause or due diligence to overcome the limitation bar.
Sivankutty v. Harinder Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's second appeal challenging ownership and possession of a property, affirming that adverse possession and benami claims require clear evidence and that concurrent factual findings cannot be disturbed absent substantial questions of law.
Sh. Ramesh Kumar v. Sh. Balbir Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the 1984 partition of ancestral property was complete and the appellants failed to prove co-ownership or entitlement to partition of the disputed property.