Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

United Indian Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sourav Banerjee

10 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:10206

The Delhi High Court recalculated compensation for a motor accident victim by reasonably adjusting variable incentives, affirming 50% functional disability, granting future prospects addition, and denying prosthetic limb costs due to lack of evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation functional disability variable incentive

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. SURAJ PAL

10 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:10173

The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of compensation for 100% permanent disability, affirming the assessment of non-pecuniary damages, loss of income based on minimum wages of Uttar Pradesh, and reasonable attendant charges in absence of documentary proof.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation permanent disability non-pecuniary damages

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Aarti Gautam & Ors.

10 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:10169

The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award granting 50% future prospects, holding that a standard termination clause does not negate permanent employment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 future prospects permanent employment termination clause

Samta v. Sudeepak Kumar Rajan

10 Dec 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:10087

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for partition of property as HUF property due to lack of proof of joint family funds or existence of an HUF, holding the property to be separate property of the deceased and rejecting the plaint for want of cause of action.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Hindu Undivided Family coparcenary property Hindu Succession Act 1956 Section 6 Hindu Succession Act

The New India Assurance Company Ltd v. Karu Yadav

10 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:10081

The Delhi High Court held that a driving licence validly renewed by the competent authority is presumed valid despite allegations of the original licence being fake, dismissing the insurer's appeal for recovery against the driver-owner.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Significant driving licence validity renewal of driving licence motor vehicles act insurance company recovery

Sh. Anil Kumar v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

10 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:10045

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the Insurance Company's recovery rights, holding that the driver was not intoxicated beyond permissible limits and there was no breach of the insurance policy.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 Section 185 MVA Intoxication Insurance policy breach

Sri Ganesh Engineering Works v. Northern Railway & Anr.

10 Dec 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:9520
Cites 2 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that pre-arbitral conciliation is directory and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a terminated railway contract, despite procedural provisions in the contract being outdated.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement conciliation arbitral tribunal appointment of arbitrator

Amarjit Singh Chhabra v. Food Corporation of India

10 Dec 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:9920

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging recoveries for overstay in FCI Guest Houses and related deductions, holding that valid circulars barred HRA entitlement during such overstay and no discrimination occurred.

administrative petition_dismissed House Rent Allowance Guest House stay Food Corporation of India audit objection

S.V. v. State

10 Dec 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:9821-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld conviction for penetrative sexual assault and issued comprehensive directions mandating free medical treatment and rehabilitation for sexual offence survivors under BNSS, CrPC, and POCSO Act.

criminal other Significant free medical treatment sexual offences POCSO Act Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sangita Mishra & Ors.

10 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9884

The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award to the deceased's parents, affirming that a one-third deduction for personal expenses is appropriate when parents are dependent and no independent income evidence exists.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant loss of dependency personal expenses deduction motor accident claim dependency of parents

Jagdish v. Om Pal Singh

10 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9806
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident death claim by applying skilled worker wages, reducing personal expense deductions, recognizing all children as dependents, and applying a 10% increase per Supreme Court precedent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation enhancement loss of dependency loss of consortium

Giriraj Maheswari v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board

10 Dec 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:9550

The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from failure to provide peaceful possession of an allotted parking site.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Sole Arbitrator appointment Arbitration agreement

EXXONMOBIL LUBRICANTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASHA AUTOMINE PRIVATE LIMITED

10 Dec 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:9549
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes arising from a commercial agreement where the respondent failed to consent or appear.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of sole arbitrator Service of notice

M/S GRANDSLAM DEVELOPERS PVT LTD v. AKSHAY GANDHI PROPRIETOR OF PRAXIS DESIGN SOLUTIONS

10 Dec 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru, ACJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:9539-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court held that a valid arbitration agreement mandates referral of parties to arbitration under Section 8 of the A&C Act, even if liability is admitted, and set aside the Commercial Court's order rejecting such referral.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 8 application arbitration agreement admission of liability

SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S A v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS

10 Dec 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:9690

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and restored the trademark application for a device mark by holding that a descriptive word in the application description does not bar registration of the device mark itself under Section 9(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 9(1)(b) device mark descriptive mark

Sunil Kumar Jain v. Anita Gupta

10 Dec 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9718

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order setting aside an ex parte decree due to improper service despite partial payment by the judgment debtor.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 9 Rule 13 CPC ex parte decree service of summons service by publication

M/S. Weddingpark Hospitalities Pvt. Ltd v. Balesh Devi Bhadana & Anr.

10 Dec 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:9582
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court constituted a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate lease disputes under an undisputed Arbitration Agreement, allowing arbitration to proceed under DIAC rules.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration Agreement Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Lease Deed dispute Arbitral Tribunal constitution

Rajesh Garg v. Somnath Aggarwal

10 Dec 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:9609

Delhi High Court granted extension of time under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for completion of arbitral proceedings despite respondents' refusal to consent, holding no undue delay attributable to the arbitrator.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A extension of time arbitral proceedings

M/S Mega Overseas Pvt Ltd v. Rahul Goel

10 Dec 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:9692

The Delhi High Court fixed interim user and occupation charges for a commercial property based on comparable lease deeds and continued interim protection subject to payment of these charges during eviction proceedings.

property other user and occupation charges lease deed interim protection eviction petition

Sh. Gian Chand & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

10 Dec 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:9676

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR for cheating under Section 420 IPC involving disputed property sale, holding that investigation and trial are necessary to determine the petitioners' knowledge and intent.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 420 IPC quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC cheating