Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Mir Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that co-owners of jointly acquired land are entitled to equal enhanced compensation awarded to any co-owner, directing payment of enhanced compensation to the petitioners at par with other co-owners.
Anuraag Jasraaj Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the opening of the sealed cover and restoration of the petitioner's seniority for promotion after quashing of disciplinary penalty, restraining further promotions until compliance.
Gayatri Jain v. Sahil
The Delhi High Court held that major married children can be considered dependents for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, reducing the personal expenses deduction to one-third and enhancing the awarded compensation.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Naveen Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the award of compensation for a motor accident victim despite delay in FIR registration and confirming the negligence of the driver and the disability assessment.
Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd v. Interio International P Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunction against defendants using a deceptively similar trademark 'OMRA' on pharmaceutical products, affirming trademark infringement and passing off with costs awarded to the plaintiff.
Union of India & Ors. v. Amar Rana
The High Court quashed a Tribunal order for failing to consider individual facts and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication applying established legal principles.
Staff Selection Commission v. Gaurav
The Delhi High Court quashed a Tribunal order for failing to apply relevant legal principles to individual facts and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Staff Selection Commission v. Nitin Singh
The Delhi High Court quashed a Tribunal order for failing to consider individual facts and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication applying established principles from prior SSC judgments.
Staff Selection Commission v. Ankit Kumar
The Delhi High Court quashed a Tribunal order for failing to consider individual facts and remanded the case for fresh adjudication following established precedents.
Staff Selection Commission and Anr v. Vishal
The Delhi High Court quashed the Tribunal's order for failing to apply established principles and remanded the case for fresh adjudication considering individual facts.
National Thermal Power Corporation Limited v. Gammon India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for execution of an arbitral award is twelve years from the date the award attains finality, and mere filing of a challenge under Section 34 does not automatically stay execution post the 2015 amendment to Section 36.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Tripta Khanna
The Delhi High Court held that in a motor accident involving two vehicles with no contributory negligence by the victim, liability is joint and several under composite negligence, enhanced compensation including future prospects and multiplier was awarded, and the insurer is liable to pay full compensation with rights of recovery.
The Chairman, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Sanjay Mathur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, upholding negligence of its bus in a motor accident and confirming the compensation awarded to the injured passenger.
SMT. SONIA v. SATISH KUMAR & THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held the bus driver liable for a fatal accident caused by negligently parking the bus without warning indicators, allowing the claimants' appeal for compensation.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. SHALIBHADRA TRADERS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SMT REENA RAVINDRA KHONA AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and refused to examine limitation issues, directing constitution of an arbitral tribunal to decide all objections including limitation.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Rukmini Satish Kumar and Anr.
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan default disputes where parties failed to agree on arbitrator appointment.
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. v. Deepak and Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan agreement disputes where parties failed to agree on the arbitral tribunal.
Sheoji Kumar Pathak v. Ajay Suri
The Delhi High Court held DAV College & Management Society to be a public authority under the RTI Act, dismissed its review petition against contempt for non-compliance, and disposed of the contempt application after the information was supplied.
Ajay Kumar Gulati v. State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur (Now State Bank of India)
The Delhi High Court quashed a flawed departmental inquiry and penalty of discharge against a bank employee for denial of defence documents and procedural unfairness, directing reinstatement with pension benefits.
Karnail Singh Cheema v. State
The High Court held that discharged accused cannot be summoned directly under Section 319 CrPC without prior inquiry under Section 398 CrPC, setting aside the trial court's order summoning petitioners without such inquiry.