Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
N. Vijaya Kumar v. Technology Development Board
A director not responsible for the company's affairs at the time of cheque dishonour cannot be held liable under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and personal guarantees create only civil liability.
Vineet Kumar Sharma v. Northern Railways and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking restoration of a surrendered railway milk stall and compensation, holding that expired licenses and disputed factual claims are not amenable to writ relief under Article 226.
Sonu Bhati & Anr. v. Archana Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld that sale deeds executed in violation of court-ordered status quo are void ab initio and confer no rights on the transferee.
Kanwaljeet Dhami v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside charges against the petitioner for alleged historical rape due to unexplained delay and lack of prima facie evidence, emphasizing cautious exercise of revisional jurisdiction at the charge framing stage.
KBS Industries Ltd v. The Customs Central Excise and Service Tax Settlement Commission Principal Bench New Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Settlement Commission's order imposing interest on delayed customs duty payment under a conditional exemption scheme, affirming the validity of Notification No. 18/2015-Cus and rejecting the petitioners' challenge.
Union of India v. Sh. Chandru Dec Thr. Lrs. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal challenging the compensation of Rs. 16,750 per bigha for land in village Mamurpur, affirming the Supreme Court's prior valuation as binding.
Dilip Puri v. State N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court restored bail to the petitioner, holding that bail cancellation was unjustified after chargesheet filing and emphasizing that custodial interrogation alone cannot warrant bail cancellation in a primarily civil dispute involving alleged forgery.
Sanjay v. State (GNCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence under Section 6 of the POCSO Act based on the reliable testimony of a five-year-old victim and her mother, dismissing the appellant's challenge on grounds of inconsistencies and lack of medical evidence.
Commissioner of Customs (Air) Chennai-VII Commissionerate v. M/s Redington (India) Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld that customs duty exemption applies to Wireless Access Points using solely MIMO technology, interpreting 'MIMO and LTE products' conjunctively in the exclusion clause.
Commissioner of Customs Air Chennai-VII Commissionerate v. M/S. Ingram Micro India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the phrase "MIMO and LTE products" in the customs exemption notification applies only to products combining both technologies, thereby allowing exemption for WAPs using solely MIMO technology.
DCIT, Circle-25(1), New Delhi v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act does not apply to electricity generation companies prior to its 2012 amendment, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-9 v. M/s Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld that Section 115JB MAT provisions did not apply to electricity companies for AY 2006-07 due to inapplicability of Companies Act accounting requirements prior to the 2012 amendment.
Commissioner of Customs (Import) v. Beetal Teletech Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the phrase "MIMO and LTE products" in the customs exemption notification applies only to products combining both technologies, thereby allowing exemption for WAPs using solely MIMO technology.
Qamar Jahan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CBIC to reconsider and update the Baggage Rules, 2016, to balance preventing gold smuggling with protecting bona fide travellers from harassment, while upholding Customs' authority to confiscate undeclared jewellery beyond prescribed limits.
Bhura Singh @ Kunal v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding that serious offences with sufficient evidence warrant denial of bail pending trial.
Shubham Jain v. Poonam Arora & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition as respondents complied by passing a speaking order refusing release of the sale deed with reasons, allowing the petitioner to challenge that order via a substantive petition.
Raj Rani v. Naresh Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition against DDA for alleged non-compliance with possession orders, holding the petitioner failed to comply with court directions and thus was not entitled to relief.
APTEC Advanced Protective Technologies AG v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal's decision dismissing discovery applications which conclusively decided a substantive issue qualifies as an interim arbitral award and is challengeable under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Taekwondo Federation of India v. Indian Olympic Association
The Delhi High Court directed the Taekwondo Federation of India to conduct limited fresh selection trials with wild card entries to ensure fair participation of excluded athletes in the upcoming National Games.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Vijender Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award, ruling that absence of a driving license alone does not establish contributory negligence and affirmed the sole negligence of the offending vehicle's driver.