Brij Kishor and Ors v. Union of India & Ors

Delhi High Court · 10 Jan 2025 · 2025:DHC:134-DB
Navin Chawla; Ravinder Dudeja
W.P.(C) 245/2025
2025:DHC:134-DB
administrative other Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and decide the petitioners' claims for retrospective pay scale benefits within twelve weeks, referencing a recent precedent, without expressing opinion on merits.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 245/2025
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 10.01.2025
W.P.(C) 245/2025 & CM APPL. 1164/2025, CM APPL.
1165/2025 BRIJ KISHOR AND ORS .....Petitioners
Through: Mr.Sahil Chandra, Mr.Jai Singh Saharan, Mr.Abhinav Singh, Ms.Ananya Singh, Mr.Parth
Tiwari, Advs.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr.Varun Chugh, SPC
WITH
Mr.Shagun S.Chugh, Ms.Saumya Kapoor, GP
WITH
Ms.Meera Singh, Mr.Utsav A.Magotra, Ms.Nandita Mishra, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)
JUDGMENT

1. By the present petition, the petitioners pray for the grant of the Notional Monetary Benefits in replacement pay scale to the Petitioners w.e.f. 01.01.1996 to 10.10.1997, as per the ranks held by the petitioners as on 01.01.1996.

2. In support of their claims, the petitioners place reliance on the Judgment dated 14.08.2024 of this Court in a batch of petitions, W.P.(C) 245/2025 including W.P.(C). No. 1022/2023, titled Ajit Singh & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

3. Issue Notice.

4. Notice is accepted by Mr.Varun Chugh, the learned counsel for the respondents.

5. Having considered the contents of the petition, we are of the opinion that the respondents should consider the same as a representation of the petitioners and decide upon the same within a period of twelve weeks from today, especially keeping in view the Judgment of this Court in Ajit Singh (supra).

6. In case the petitioners are held entitled to the reliefs as claimed, the same shall be released to the petitioners, however, restricted to the period of three years prior to the date of filing of the present writ petition. In case the claims of the petitioners are rejected for any reason, the reasoned order thereof shall be communicated to the petitioners, and it shall be open to the petitioners to challenge the same in accordance with law. We make it clear that we have not expressed any opinion on the merit of the present petition.

7. The petition is disposed of with the above directions.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J JANUARY 10, 2025 RN/DG Click here to check corrigendum, if any