Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Mukesh Singh Rajput v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court held that ACP/MACP benefits must be granted reckoning service from initial appointment date ignoring re-mustering, directing respondents to grant benefits accordingly.
Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Limited v. Friends Inc & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Aditya Birla Fashion and Retail Ltd., declaring "PETER ENGLAND" a well-known trademark and restraining defendants from infringing its use.
Sandeep Gupta v. Union Public Service Commission and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide the petitioner's interim relief application by a specified date, emphasizing timely adjudication and appointed counsel to assist the petitioner.
MS L R SHARMA AND CO. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition to correct the recorded appearance of counsel in a prior judgment through a corrigendum, as the error was inadvertent and unopposed.
Synergies Casting Ltd v. National Research Development Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that appeals against orders directing deposit of arbitral award amounts pending Section 34 petitions are not maintainable except as expressly provided under Sections 37 or 50 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, dismissing the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Ravi Prakash Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that experience for promotion must be assessed by nature of work, not pay scale, and directed reassessment of the petitioner's eligibility for promotion to Logistics Officer in BSF.
Ex Const Crew Sher Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a BSF dismissal order passed in Assam, holding that it lacked territorial jurisdiction and applying the doctrine of forum non conveniens.
Parmar Naran Bhai Rupa Bhai & Anr. v. Sh Govind Mohan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition after respondents tendered an unconditional apology and agreed to refund amounts recovered in violation of an interim stay order.
Kew Precision Parts Pvt Ltd v. State of NCT of Delhi & Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the declaration of the petitioners as proclaimed offenders under Section 82 Cr.P.C. after due process was followed, dismissing their challenge to the order and FIR under Section 174A IPC.
Singh, ACB, GNCTD v. S.K. Kohli
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition to cancel anticipatory bail of a DJB Executive Engineer accused of corruption, holding that custodial interrogation was not justified given the documentary nature of evidence and absence of risk of tampering or fleeing.
Shivani Madan v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-01 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that income from house property is taxable only in the hands of the person entitled to receive it, and mere joint ownership without defined shares does not automatically impose equal tax liability.
Prem Bhalla v. Subhasish Panda
The Delhi High Court directed DDA to refund amounts paid under forged allotment letters to petitioners, subject to conditions, holding that refund does not impede criminal investigations and mere suspicion of complicity is insufficient to withhold refund.
Saurabh Chadha v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR alleging assault and molestation, holding that prima facie cognizable offences were made out and the FIR could not be quashed at the threshold.
Divine Infracon Pvt Ltd v. PR Commissioner of Income Tax 3
The Delhi High Court held that the ITAT erred in deciding the addition under Section 68 without the CIT(A) adjudicating it and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, while upholding the applicability of Section 153A only if incriminating material is found during search.
Ved Vir Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed a re-examination of a candidate whose tattoo removal scar was unhealed at the medical test, emphasizing the need to allow healing time before disqualification in CAPF recruitment.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd v. Micro and Small Enterprise Facilitation Council and Others
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdictional objections to arbitral awards under the MSMED Act must be challenged under the Arbitration Act and dismissed a writ petition challenging an award for exceeding the scope of reference.
Gurmit Singh v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted without arrest, holding that bail cannot be cancelled without cogent supervening circumstances and no notice to complainant is required when chargesheet is filed without arrest.
Neelam Gaur v. The Government of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of a fair price shop license for lack of hearing and directed a fresh de novo hearing with opportunity to be heard.
SHARMA SALES CORPORATION AND ORS. v. DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEV. CORP. LTD.
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioners to produce a reconstituted partnership deed to establish entitlement to possession of an industrial plot, ordering the respondent to consider the documents and pass an appropriate order after hearing the petitioners.
Syngenta Limited and Anr. v. GSP Crop Science Private Limited
The Delhi High Court directed the defendant to comply with agreed Terms of Reference by providing access to certain confidential documents to the plaintiffs’ Tier-II Confidentiality Club member, holding such disclosure lawful and necessary for the patent infringement suit.