Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Kaushal Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld medical disqualification of a candidate with Coronal Hypospadias for appointment through LDCE to CAPF, affirming that medical fitness criteria must be independently satisfied regardless of prior appointments.
7 Roppen Transportation Services Private Limited v. Nipun Gupta & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed rectification petitions to cancel the respondents' identical 'RAPIDO' trademark registrations due to prior adoption and use by the petitioner, finding a likelihood of confusion and dishonest registration.
Mandeep Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to constitute an Integrated Medical Board within four weeks to assess the petitioner's medical fitness following a disability injury, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Amit Kumar Yadav v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded a fitness determination back to the medical board for fresh expert examination where medical reports were inconclusive on disqualification under recruitment medical guidelines.
Sumit Sangwan v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful dismissal of a BSF officer under Section 10 of the BSF Act and Rule 20 of the BSF Rules after the Confirming Authority refused to confirm Security Force Court findings, rendering further trial impracticable.
Raju Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to provide reasons for applying the sealed cover procedure in the petitioner's promotion case, emphasizing adherence to the Supreme Court precedent in K. V. Janakiraman.
Arbind Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging termination from SSB service on the ground that it was not the appropriate forum under the doctrine of forum non conveniens.
Rajendera Prasad Verma v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to provide reasons for applying the sealed cover procedure in the petitioner's promotion case, emphasizing compliance with the Supreme Court precedent in K. V. Janakiraman.
Tapan Chetry v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to provide reasons for using the sealed cover procedure in the petitioner's promotion case, emphasizing adherence to Supreme Court guidelines and allowing the petitioner to challenge such reasons.
Delhi Administration v. Hari Chand
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against acquittal in a food adulteration case, holding that discrepancies in scientific reports and the double presumption of innocence warranted upholding the respondent's acquittal.
Mithlesh Kumar & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for causing grievous injuries under Section 308 IPC but modified their sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors.
Gaurav Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical unfitness in CRPF recruitment for lack of territorial jurisdiction, upholding the binding nature of jurisdiction clauses in recruitment advertisements.
Mohd Tahir Hussain v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court denied interim bail to a riot-accused petitioner to contest elections but granted custody parole with strict conditions to enable filing nomination papers.
Mohd. Sirajudeen v. State (EOW South-East) Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a forgery and cheating case after investigation completion, emphasizing that pre-trial detention must not be punitive and bail is the rule, not the exception.
Ex Const Crew Pramod Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the BSF dismissal order for lack of territorial jurisdiction, applying the doctrine of forum non conveniens and directing the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in Assam.
Anand Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging CISF dismissal on grounds of forum non conveniens, directing the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional High Court in Tamil Nadu.
Sunil Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a CRPF Pay Clerk for financial misconduct and denied compassionate allowance, emphasizing limited judicial interference in departmental inquiries conducted per natural justice.
Rahul Jain v. M/S Yes Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court reduced the surety bond amount in a cheque dishonour case, emphasizing that bail conditions must be reasonable, individualized, and not excessive to ensure meaningful access to bail.
Ramesh Chandra v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner for mere unconscious possession of a single live cartridge, reaffirming that conscious possession is essential for criminal liability under the Arms Act.
Rajan Handa v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking FIR registration under Section 156(3) CrPC in a family dispute involving alleged forgery and breach of trust, holding that the matter was essentially civil and police investigation was not warranted at this stage.