Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Pradeep Bhardwaj and Chirag Rathi v. Sandeep S. Meshram & Anr.

03 Feb 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:703

The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition alleging delay in empanelment decision, directing cooperation and granting liberty to revive if non-compliance persists.

administrative petition_dismissed empanelment CGHS contempt of court court directions

Nitin Kumar v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

03 Feb 2025 · Jasmeet Singh, J · 2025:DHC:685

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of rape and extortion, holding that failure to provide written grounds of arrest violated constitutional rights, while emphasizing that consent and other allegations are to be decided at trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail grounds of arrest Article 22(1) rape

Sandeep Dhaka v. Union of India

03 Feb 2025 · Navin Chawla; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:623-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an inconsistent and unjustified APAR grading of a CRPF officer, emphasizing the need for objective, substantiated, and balanced performance assessments.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Annual Performance Appraisal Report APAR grading pen picture numerical grading

Ram Gopal Goswami v. State NCT of Delhi

03 Feb 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:670-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a habeas corpus petition for a missing juvenile directing continued police investigation and periodic reporting, noting the boy may have left voluntarily and attained majority.

criminal petition_dismissed habeas corpus missing juvenile Article 226 Constitution of India Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita

Rinku v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

03 Feb 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:667-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the production and custody of a missing minor girl to her parents with protective directions, emphasizing her welfare and parental responsibilities.

constitutional petition_allowed habeas corpus minor custody missing child illegal detention

Dr Pradeep Mishra v. Union of India and Ors

03 Feb 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:661

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking Sponsorship Certificate and study leave for a PG medical course outside the government’s restricted list of eligible disciplines, upholding the validity of the policy decision limiting permitted streams.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Sponsorship Certificate study leave PG medical courses policy decision

Isar Engineers Private Ltd. v. NTPC-SAIL Power Company Ltd.

03 Feb 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:658
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award due to invalid unilateral appointment of arbitrators who were dealing authorities, violating the arbitration clause and principles of impartiality.

civil petition_allowed Significant arbitration unilateral appointment justifiable apprehension of bias arbitrator independence

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Naresh Gupta & Ors.

03 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:653

The Delhi High Court held that major sons dependent on their deceased housewife mother for gratuitous services are entitled to compensation assessed at not less than minimum wages with appropriate deductions and awarded loss of consortium, while upholding 9% interest on the compensation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation housewife notional income loss of dependency

MS. NS v. The State; Deepika Seth

03 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:652

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a counter FIR alleging sexual assault and wrongful restraint, holding that cross FIRs and procedural irregularities are not sufficient grounds for quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 Cr.P.C. cross FIR malice and collusion

Asma Parveen v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

03 Feb 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:651

The Delhi High Court dismissed a review petition seeking to intervene in a disposed writ petition, holding that review jurisdiction is limited and cannot be used to re-argue settled issues or implead a non-party without sufficient cause.

civil petition_dismissed Significant review petition Order 47 Rule 1 CPC error apparent on face of record perjury

Novateur Electrical & Digital Systems Pvt Ltd v. V-Guard Industries Ltd

03 Feb 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:650

The Delhi High Court allowed the defendant to place additional documents on record discovered post-pleadings in a design infringement suit, holding that reasonable cause for non-disclosure is not required for subsequently discovered documents and their admissibility is to be decided at trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XI Rule 1(10) CPC additional documents reasonable cause for non-disclosure design infringement

Pappu Pathak v. M S Bansal Brothers Industries

03 Feb 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:620

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Labour Court awards that found petitioners had not completed 240 days of service and upheld dismissal of their claims of illegal termination.

labor appeal_dismissed illegal termination labour court 240 days service appointment letter

Vinod Chawla v. Delhi Development Authority

03 Feb 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:635
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside an exorbitant misuse charge demand by DDA, holding that such charges must be claimed within a reasonable time and allowed conversion of leasehold to freehold on payment of reasonable charges.

property appeal_allowed Significant misuse charges leasehold to freehold conversion Delhi Development Authority reasonable time limitation

Ram Singh Saini v. Delhi Development Authority

03 Feb 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:632
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions by occupants of land leased to cooperative societies, holding they have no legal title and are unauthorized occupants subject to eviction under the Public Premises Act, with no entitlement to alternative allotment or compensation.

property petition_dismissed Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 Delhi Development Authority cooperative societies unauthorized occupation

Mehruddin Ansari & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.

03 Feb 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:633

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging demolition of properties in an unauthorised colony, holding that properties in Yamuna floodplains (Zone 'O') are excluded from regularization and the demolition was lawful and justified.

property petition_dismissed Significant unauthorised colonies PM-UDAY Scheme Zone O Yamuna floodplains

Shri Ram Kishan v. Delhi Development Authority

03 Feb 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:641

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging DDA's possession over acquired land, holding that revenue records do not confer title and cultivation in Yamuna flood plains is prohibited.

property petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 Constitution land acquisition revenue records jamabandi

Delhi State Legal Services Authority v. Smt. Durgawanti & Ors.

03 Feb 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:642
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that motor accident compensation claims are excluded from the Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme, quashing the MACT's order directing DSLSA to pay compensation under the Scheme.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Victim Compensation Scheme, 2018 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 357A Cr.P.C. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal

Udaiveer & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Feb 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:638
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' claim of ownership over acquired government land, holding that revenue records do not confer title against the State and that physical possession by the State vests absolute ownership, permitting dispossession without prior suit.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition revenue records jamabandi possession

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd v. Voestalpine Schienen GMBH, Austria

03 Feb 2025 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2025:DHC:640

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, upholding the tribunal's contract interpretation and limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Performance Bank Guarantee Liquidated Damages

Belvedere Resources DMCC v. OCL Iron and Steel Ltd.

03 Feb 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1602-DB

The Delhi High Court remitted the petition for interim reliefs under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act to the Single Judge for fresh consideration, emphasizing jurisdictional issues in international arbitration with a foreign seat.

civil other Significant International Arbitration Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Interim Relief Singapore International Arbitration Centre