Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Akhileshwar Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of conspiracy and robbery, holding that a prima facie case exists warranting custodial interrogation.
Yasin @ Gilli v. The State of NCT Delhi
Bail was denied to the accused in a murder case at the trial stage due to the grave nature of the offence, his criminal history, risk of witness tampering, and absence of undue trial delay.
Husky Injection Molding Systems Shanghai Ltd and Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court condoned a 19-minute delay in submission of questionnaire response in an anti-dumping investigation, allowing the petitioners to participate fully in the proceedings.
Shakti Rani Sharma & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful hospitalization of Mr. P.S. for treatment of Paranoid Schizophrenia and dismissed the habeas corpus petition seeking his production.
Sushil Aggarwal v. Principal Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that denial of cross-examination under Section 138B of the Customs Act of a witness whose statement is relied upon violates natural justice, directing fresh adjudication after granting such opportunity.
Dr. Rashmi Saluja v. Religare Enterprises Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's interim injunction application restraining the defendant company from proceeding with a resolution subjecting her to retirement by rotation, holding that she failed to establish the essential conditions for injunction and had acquiesced to the rotation process.
Deepak Gupta v. Dharmendra Kumar Gupta
The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the summary decree against the appellant for failure to seek leave to defend within the prescribed time under Order XXXVII CPC despite valid service of summons.
Ramesh Kumar Khatri v. Durgesh Pathak
The Delhi High Court dismissed an election petition for failure to disclose a cause of action, holding that mere non-maintenance of correct election expenditure accounts without exceeding prescribed limits does not constitute corrupt practice under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
Johnson & Johnson Pte. Ltd. v. Mr. Abbireddi Satish Kumar & Ors.
Delhi High Court holds that offering goods bearing an impugned trademark for sale through websites accessible in Delhi constitutes use within its jurisdiction, dismissing defendant's plea to reject plaint for lack of territorial jurisdiction.
Mohinder Singh v. Durgesh Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an election petition for failure to disclose material facts constituting a cause of action, holding that mere vague allegations and non-substantial defects in nomination affidavits do not invalidate an election.
Kanwaljeet Kaur v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdictional Assessing Officers retain concurrent jurisdiction to initiate reassessment under Section 148 despite the faceless assessment scheme, validating reassessment notices issued by them.
Marfing Tamang @ Maaina Tamang v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court held that under section 50 Cr.P.C., grounds of arrest must be communicated immediately and simultaneously with arrest, and failure to do so renders the arrest and remand illegal.
Sunil Kumar Uppal v. The Commissioner, MCD
The Delhi High Court held that financial difficulties cannot justify denial of interest on delayed retiral benefits and directed payment of interest at the GPF rate, setting aside the Tribunal’s order denying interest.
Bimlesh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order awarding interest at GPF rates on delayed retiral benefits and remanded the matter for reconsideration to ensure consistency in interest rates awarded.
Jagbir Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for pay parity and pension re-fixation by passing a speaking order within twelve weeks, granting relief if merited with arrears limited to three years.
Anish Muralidhar v. EK NK Bhupal Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an Armed Forces Tribunal order due to an unexplained delay of nearly five years, applying the doctrine of delay and laches.
Rajnish v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Medical Board's decision declaring the petitioner medically unfit due to convergent squint, emphasizing limited judicial interference in medical fitness assessments for disciplined forces.
Amit Sharma v. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful termination of a probationary employee without confirmation, rejecting claims of mala fide or punitive dismissal in absence of specific confirmation order or constitutional violation.
State Through RPF v. Farooq and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a railway property theft case due to lack of independent witnesses and procedural irregularities affecting the reliability of confessional statements made to RPF officials.
Creative Travels Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that extended limitation under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994 cannot be invoked without clear proof of wilful suppression of facts when the same facts were already disclosed in earlier proceedings, quashing the impugned Show Cause Notice against Creative Travels Pvt Ltd.