Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Rajendra Alexander & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

03 Feb 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:625

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective recovery of alleged excess pay from retired NHPCL employees is impermissible without prior notice and lawful authority, and directed restoration of their medical benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant pay fixation stagnation increments retired employees recovery of excess payments

Manohar Lal v. The State

03 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:872

The Delhi High Court held that contempt proceedings are not the proper remedy to enforce Settlements under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and directed enforcement through Sections 421 and 431 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Settlement enforcement Contempt proceedings Section 421 CrPC

Union of India v. Karan Sharma

03 Feb 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:630
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition seeking leave to appeal against the acquittal under the NDPS Act, holding that the accused's statement under Section 67 was inadmissible without corroboration and that procedural lapses and lack of evidence justified the acquittal.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 67 NDPS confessional statement chain of custody

Oracle America, Inc. v. Sandeep Khandelwal and Anr

03 Feb 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:838

The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent’s trademark registration for being deceptively similar and mala fide in violation of the petitioner’s prior JAVA trademark rights under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 47 Section 57 deceptive similarity

ASTELLAS PHARMA INC v. ASTELLAZ PHARMACEUTICALS

03 Feb 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:837
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Astellas Pharma Inc. against Astellaz Pharmaceuticals for trademark infringement and passing off of the deceptively similar mark 'ASTELLAZ' in an unopposed suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Permanent injunction Deceptively similar mark

Etawah Chakeri (Kanpur) Highway Private Limited v. National Highway Authority of India & Anr

03 Feb 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:811

The Delhi High Court held that pre-arbitration conciliation is directory and referred the dispute under a concession agreement to arbitration, continuing interim relief restraining recovery from escrow pending arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 pre-arbitration conciliation directory vs mandatory dispute resolution clause

State v. Lalit

03 Feb 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:629
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case, holding that the prosecutrix's testimony did not inspire confidence and that the trial court's appreciation of evidence was not perverse.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape sole testimony prosecutrix acquittal

Krishna Real Estate Enterprises Pvt Ltd v. Gurcharan Singh Syal & Ors.

03 Feb 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:778
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held it lacked territorial jurisdiction over a suit for recovery of funds allegedly siphoned by defendants, returning the plaint for filing in the competent court in Punjab.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Order VII Rule 10 CPC Section 20 CPC cause of action

Bharat Singh v. Karan Singh and Others

03 Feb 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:777

The Delhi High Court held that time spent in mediation is excluded from the limitation period for filing written statements under its Rules, allowing condonation of delay within the maximum 120-day period.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement condonation of delay mediation Section 89 CPC

J P Srivastava v. Hasan Akbar Kazmi & Anr

03 Feb 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:779

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application to include new defendants and facts based on forensic evidence, emphasizing a liberal approach to amendments necessary for effective adjudication without causing prejudice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint Order VI Rule 17 CPC confidential information forensic analysis

Airports Authority of India v. East India Construction Company Ltd.

03 Feb 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:775

Delhi High Court set aside part of an arbitral award for ignoring contractual forfeiture clauses on performance bank guarantee, remanding the matter for reconsideration under principles of patent illegality.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 performance bank guarantee forfeiture

Ashish Kapur & Anr. v. Deepak Seth & Ors.

03 Feb 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:774

The Delhi High Court held that at the referral stage under Section 11(6) Arbitration Act, the Court must appoint the agreed arbitrator and leave the question of non-signatory parties' inclusion to the arbitral tribunal, following the Supreme Court's guidance in Cox and Kings Limited.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration Agreement Section 11(6) Arbitration Act Non-signatories Group of Companies doctrine

GROSON ENGINEERS v. M/S RAJIV AGGARWAL & ANR.

03 Feb 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:712

The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference under Article 226 in interlocutory orders of an arbitral tribunal is permissible only in exceptional cases, and parties must await the final award to challenge it under the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Article 226 Constitution judicial intervention interlocutory orders

Jagdish Chandra v. State Trading Corporation of India Ltd

03 Feb 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:624
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that retired employees are entitled to full medical reimbursement for emergency hospitalization expenses despite circular-imposed ceilings, affirming the constitutional right to timely medical treatment under Article 21.

administrative petition_allowed Significant medical reimbursement emergency hospitalization Voluntary Retirement Scheme STC Medical Scheme

Sanjay Dhingra v. Woori Bank, Gurgaon Branch

03 Feb 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:627

The Delhi High Court quashed summons against a Managing Director under Section 138 NI Act, holding that liability lies only on the drawer of the cheque and not on a director of a different company who merely handed over the cheque.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonour of cheque Liability of directors

Jyotirmaya Nand v. State of NCT of Delhi

03 Feb 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:724

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner who unknowingly possessed live cartridges without a firearm and held a valid arms license.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 25 Arms Act conscious possession live cartridges arms license

Raseed Beg & Anr. v. Akbar Khan & Ors.

03 Feb 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:682

The Delhi High Court upheld the minimum wage-based income assessment in a motor accident claim but enhanced the interest rate on compensation to 9% per annum, directing higher interest for delayed payments.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant motor accident claim income assessment minimum wages interest on compensation

Puneet Singhal v. The Insurance Ombudsman, New Delhi & Anr.

03 Feb 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:711

The Delhi High Court held that the Insurance Ombudsman must register and decide fresh complaints when mediation fails and cannot treat a remand for reconsideration as settlement, directing the Ombudsman to decide the petitioner's claim afresh under the Insurance Ombudsman Rules, 2017.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Insurance Ombudsman Rules 2017 mediation award insurance claim rejection

All India Railway Accounts Staff Association v. Smt. Jaya Varma Sinha and Anr.

03 Feb 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:710

The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to extend arrears payments to all eligible members of the petitioner Association upon receipt of a verified list, disposing of the contempt petition with liberty to revive.

administrative petition_dismissed arrears payment clarificatory order contempt petition All India Railway Accounts Staff Association

Charu Jolly v. Rohit Kalra

03 Feb 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:704

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a petition seeking contempt proceedings for visitation order non-compliance, directing the petitioner to seek relief before the Family Court.

family petition_dismissed visitation rights contempt proceedings Family Court order wilful disobedience