Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Sunil Gandhi v. State

06 Feb 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:754

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of a company director accused of financial fraud in real estate projects, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation to trace diverted funds and expedite investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail economic offences misappropriation of funds custodial interrogation

Mr. Shaunak Kashyap, Ms. Nistha Gupta, Ms. Muskan Yadav, Mr. Ahmar Shad and Mr. Anuj Panwar v. State

06 Feb 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:755

Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of petitioner accused of economic offences involving misappropriation of funds, emphasizing necessity of custodial interrogation for effective investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail economic offences misappropriation diversion of funds

Asma Bano Ansari v. State of NCT of Delhi

06 Feb 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:732

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case involving intermediate quantity of contraband, holding that co-accused disclosures and indirect evidence cannot solely deny bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail NDPS Act intermediate quantity disclosure statement

Rashmi Saluja v. Religare Enterprises Limited

06 Feb 2025 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:719-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking interim injunction against the retirement by rotation of an executive chairperson, holding that prior acquiescence and availability of monetary remedy preclude judicial interference in corporate governance decisions.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant interim injunction retirement by rotation corporate governance Reserve Bank of India Act

Rajesh @ Tinku v. State

06 Feb 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:702-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentences of appellants for murder based on credible eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence, and adverse inference from refusal to undergo TIP.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant ocular evidence injured eyewitness Test Identification Parade dock identification

Aadhar Khera v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

06 Feb 2025 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2025:DHC:714
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications of Aadhar Khera and Charu Khera in a multi-crore economic fraud case, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation given their active role and ongoing investigation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail economic offences financial fraud custodial interrogation

Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. M/S Globe Capital Market Limited

04 Feb 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:655

The Delhi High Court upheld the NCDRC's dismissal of the petitioner's revision petition for delay, emphasizing the necessity of a reasonable explanation for condonation of delay and limiting supervisory interference under Article 227.

consumer_protection petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay sufficient cause limitation period Consumer Protection Act, 2019

Uttam Saikia & Ors. v. Sashastra Seema Bal & Anr.

04 Feb 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:759-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to examine and grant Patient Care Allowance to the petitioners as per eligibility criteria, with arrears and interest payable if delayed.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Patient Care Allowance Hospital Patient Care Allowance PCA/HPCA allowance arrears

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Urban Land Management Pvt Ltd

04 Feb 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:725-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the ITAT order deleting Section 14A disallowance and upheld concurrent factual findings on project revenue recognition for AY 2016-17.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 14A disallowance Income Tax Act, 1961 Finance Act 2022 amendment concurrent findings

Chand Behari thr Lrs v. Union of India & Anr

04 Feb 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1433

The Delhi High Court allowed enhancement of compensation for acquired land by applying the final market value fixed in a prior landmark case, condoning delay and directing payment of arrears with interest and solatium.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 market value enhancement compensation interest

Krishan Lal Marwah v. Sharvan Kumar Marwah & Ors.

04 Feb 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1306

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, rejecting the tenant's plea of impermissible partial eviction and affirming the limited scope of revision jurisdiction.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide need partial eviction

Satya Narain Gupta v. Anil Kumar Bansal

04 Feb 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1273

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the ground of the landlord's bona fide requirement of ground floor premises for business, emphasizing the limited scope of revision and the tenant's inability to dictate the landlord's use of property.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement landlord-tenant relationship eviction petition revision jurisdiction

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd v. Shree Lakshmi Venkatesh Cargo Movers and Consultants

04 Feb 2025 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2025:DHC:1048
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The High Court reversed the acquittal in a cheque dishonour case, affirming that statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 NI Act apply once cheque issuance and signature are admitted, placing the burden on the accused to rebut the presumption of debt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 139 Section 118

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Mohit Garg

04 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:989

The Delhi High Court held that investigation into offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act can proceed against unknown public servants without prior approval under Section 17A, which is required only after their identity is established.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 17A PC Act investigation against unknown public servants Section 93 CrPC

Chando Devi & Ors. v. Uttam Chand & Ors.

04 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:992

The Delhi High Court held that the death of a co-owner during appeal does not abate the appeal if other co-owners represent the estate, upheld the executing court's jurisdiction and rejected attempts to delay execution by demarcation or superstructure claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant abatement of appeal co-owners execution of decree Order XXII CPC

COWI India Pvt Ltd v. Pinnacle Air Pvt Ltd

04 Feb 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:849

The Delhi High Court held that a winding-up petition pending before it without irreversible steps can be transferred suo motu to the NCLT under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, even without a formal application.

corporate other Significant winding-up petition transfer to NCLT Companies Act, 1956 Companies Act, 2013

The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dalvir Singh & Ors.

04 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:917

The Delhi High Court held that the notional income of a deceased homemaker for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must be at least the prevailing minimum wages, granted 40% future prospects, and upheld deductions for personal expenses, modifying the compensation award accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant notional income housewife compensation Motor Vehicles Act 1988 loss of dependency

Dhirendra Kumar Sinha v. Union of India and Anr

04 Feb 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:848-DB

The Delhi High Court held that recovery of Dearness Relief paid during re-employment is lawful where the pensioner misrepresented facts, denying him equitable relief under Rafiq Masih.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Dearness Relief Pension Re-employment Recovery of overpayment

Goodearth Bricks Pvt Ltd v. Movie Time Cinema Pvt Ltd

04 Feb 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:832

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to admit additional documents in a commercial suit due to the petitioner's failure to show sufficient cause for delay under Order 11 Rule 1 CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order 11 Rule 1 CPC Order 7 Rule 14(3) CPC Commercial Courts Act 2015 filing additional documents

Bharat Yatra Trust and Ors. v. H.N Sharma

04 Feb 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:815

The Delhi High Court held that leave to sue under Section 92 CPC must be expressly granted and cannot be presumed, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of maintainability where only one plaintiff survived.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 92 CPC leave to sue maintainability trust suit