Delhi High Court
37,406 judgments
Dr. Jairam & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR and charge-sheet alleging criminal breach of trust and cruelty under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC, holding that the allegations disclose prima facie offences and civil remedies do not bar criminal proceedings.
DELHI METRO WELFARE ORGANISATION v. OMBUDSMAN RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed the RBI Ombudsman to reconsider a complaint regarding non-extension of bank guarantees by passing a reasoned order addressing all submissions to ensure transparency and fairness.
Ram Lal Gambhir v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to reconsider the petitioner's request for change of floor based on a government hospital medical certificate, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders and compassionate consideration under its policy.
Gurdial Kaur; Sukhdev Singh; Amritpal Singh; Jinender Kumar; Sunil Kumar v. Charanjit Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's rejection of the Defendants' application to dismiss the Suit for possession, holding that the Suit was maintainable and not barred by limitation or res judicata given the final denial of sale permission under a conditional decree.
Anil Kumar v. The State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR No.249/2021, holding that the FIR discloses prima facie offences and the quashing power under Section 482 CrPC must be sparingly exercised.
Islam v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of culpable homicide charges due to contradictions in eyewitness testimony and inconclusive medical evidence, emphasizing the benefit of doubt in criminal trials.
Akhileshwar Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of conspiracy and robbery, holding that a prima facie case exists warranting custodial interrogation.
Yasin @ Gilli v. The State of NCT Delhi
Bail was denied to the accused in a murder case at the trial stage due to the grave nature of the offence, his criminal history, risk of witness tampering, and absence of undue trial delay.
Husky Injection Molding Systems Shanghai Ltd and Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court condoned a 19-minute delay in submission of questionnaire response in an anti-dumping investigation, allowing the petitioners to participate fully in the proceedings.
Shakti Rani Sharma & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful hospitalization of Mr. P.S. for treatment of Paranoid Schizophrenia and dismissed the habeas corpus petition seeking his production.
Sushil Aggarwal v. Principal Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that denial of cross-examination under Section 138B of the Customs Act of a witness whose statement is relied upon violates natural justice, directing fresh adjudication after granting such opportunity.
Dr. Rashmi Saluja v. Religare Enterprises Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's interim injunction application restraining the defendant company from proceeding with a resolution subjecting her to retirement by rotation, holding that she failed to establish the essential conditions for injunction and had acquiesced to the rotation process.
Deepak Gupta v. Dharmendra Kumar Gupta
The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the summary decree against the appellant for failure to seek leave to defend within the prescribed time under Order XXXVII CPC despite valid service of summons.
Ramesh Kumar Khatri v. Durgesh Pathak
The Delhi High Court dismissed an election petition for failure to disclose a cause of action, holding that mere non-maintenance of correct election expenditure accounts without exceeding prescribed limits does not constitute corrupt practice under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
Johnson & Johnson Pte. Ltd. v. Mr. Abbireddi Satish Kumar & Ors.
Delhi High Court holds that offering goods bearing an impugned trademark for sale through websites accessible in Delhi constitutes use within its jurisdiction, dismissing defendant's plea to reject plaint for lack of territorial jurisdiction.
Mohinder Singh v. Durgesh Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed an election petition for failure to disclose material facts constituting a cause of action, holding that mere vague allegations and non-substantial defects in nomination affidavits do not invalidate an election.
Kanwaljeet Kaur v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdictional Assessing Officers retain concurrent jurisdiction to initiate reassessment under Section 148 despite the faceless assessment scheme, validating reassessment notices issued by them.
Marfing Tamang @ Maaina Tamang v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court held that under section 50 Cr.P.C., grounds of arrest must be communicated immediately and simultaneously with arrest, and failure to do so renders the arrest and remand illegal.
Sunil Kumar Uppal v. The Commissioner, MCD
The Delhi High Court held that financial difficulties cannot justify denial of interest on delayed retiral benefits and directed payment of interest at the GPF rate, setting aside the Tribunal’s order denying interest.
Bimlesh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order awarding interest at GPF rates on delayed retiral benefits and remanded the matter for reconsideration to ensure consistency in interest rates awarded.