Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Suman Devi v. State of N.C.T.

07 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:916

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking FIR registration for alleged forgery and cheating in a land sale, holding that no prima facie case was made out to warrant police investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 Cr.P.C. FIR registration Forgery Cheating

State (NCT of Delhi) v. Nilesh Mishra

07 Feb 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:749
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court expunged disparaging remarks made by the Trial Court against police officials during bail proceedings, emphasizing judicial restraint and limiting court's jurisdiction to bail decisions without prejudging investigations.

criminal petition_allowed Significant judicial restraint police discretion arrest bail proceedings

Ajay v. State

07 Feb 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:746
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed a delayed and vague FIR under Section 498A IPC in a matrimonial dispute, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC quashing of FIR inherent jurisdiction Section 482 CrPC

Vaneeta Gupta & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

07 Feb 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:750
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and proceedings against distant relatives in a dowry harassment case, holding that vague allegations without evidence of cruelty do not warrant criminal prosecution under Section 498A IPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC dowry harassment quashing of FIR inherent jurisdiction

Charanjit Kaur v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

07 Feb 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:835-DB

The High Court held that disciplinary proceedings instituted by an authority lacking jurisdiction due to reclassification of the post and designation of competent authority are null and void, setting aside the Tribunal's order.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings jurisdiction Group B post Department of Personnel & Training

Colonel Ajay Yadav & Anr v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.

07 Feb 2025 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:825-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that individual members of an association cannot file separate writ petitions on the same subject when the association's petition is pending, emphasizing the principles of locus standi, clean hands, and prohibition of forum shopping.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant locus standi forum shopping Article 226 writ petition

Mangla Shree Properties Pvt Ltd v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd

07 Feb 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2025:DHC:824-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the lawful levy of development charges by Tata Power for laying an LT network, rejecting the claim for refund based on prior electrification payments.

civil appeal_dismissed development charges electricity connection consumer grievance redressal forum low tension connection

The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Adobe Systems Software Ireland Ltd

07 Feb 2025 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela; Devendra Kumar Upadhya... · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 411
Cites 0 · Cited by 14

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal against the ITAT order on profit attribution to Adobe India's PE, affirming reliance on the Supreme Court's Morgan Stanley precedent and rejecting further additions.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Permanent Establishment Profit Attribution Transfer Pricing Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Adobe Systems Software Ireland Ltd

07 Feb 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:822-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal against the ITAT order denying existence of a PE and profit attribution for Adobe Systems Ireland for AY 2020-21, relying on settled law from earlier batch matters.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Permanent Establishment Transfer Pricing Income Tax Act 1961 Section 260A

Bhawana Sharma v. Director Welfare Department and Anr

07 Feb 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:831

The Delhi High Court directed NDMC to issue a fresh medical card without validity limitation and reconsider the petitioner's medical bill, disposing of the contempt petition subject to compliance.

administrative petition_allowed medical card court order compliance emergency certificate medical expenditure bill

HDFC ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. Rajni & Ors.

07 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:808

Delhi High Court held the truck driver solely negligent in a fatal road accident, modified compensation to Rs.55.45 lakhs with 9% interest, and clarified principles on income assessment and future prospects in motor accident claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim negligence compensation future prospects

M S Radhey Shyam Rishi Pal Factory v. Principal Commissioner of Customs Import ICD Tughlakabad & Anr

07 Feb 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:783-DB

The Delhi High Court directed de-freezing of the petitioner's bank accounts pending appeal against a customs duty demand order, leaving the question of condonation of delay to the appellate authority.

administrative petition_allowed bank attachment notice Order-in-Original show cause notice appeal before CESTAT

Sir Ratan Tata Trust & Anr. v. Dr. Rajat Shrivastava & Ors.

07 Feb 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:793

Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction protecting the registered trademarks and well-known personal name of late Mr. Ratan Tata against defendants' unauthorized use and fraudulent events.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off well-known mark personal name protection

Pramjeet@Sanni v. State NCT of Delhi

07 Feb 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:747
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act, affirming that reliable victim testimony alone can sustain conviction and that the presumption under Section 29 applies unless rebutted.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act Section 6 POCSO child sexual abuse victim testimony

Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP v. Union of India

07 Feb 2025 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:716-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity and retrospective application of Section 132 of the Companies Act, 2013 and NFRA Rules, affirming NFRA's disciplinary powers and procedural safeguards against Chartered Accountants and firms.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Section 132 Companies Act NFRA Rules retrospective operation disciplinary proceedings

Pragati Construction Consultants v. Union of India & Anr.

07 Feb 2025 · Rekha Palli; Navin Chawla; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:717-FB
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court Full Bench clarified that non-filing of the arbitral award or a fundamental defect such as absence of a valid Statement of Truth renders an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act non-est, thus invalid for limitation purposes, while procedural defects like non-filing of vakalatnama are curable.

arbitration significant Significant Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Statement of Truth non-est filing limitation period

M/S Addichem Speciality LLP v. Special Commissioner I, Department of Trade and Taxes and Anr.

07 Feb 2025 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2024 SCC OnLine All 2396

The Delhi High Court held that the statutory limitation period under Section 107 of the CGST Act for filing appeals is mandatory and cannot be extended beyond the prescribed condonable period, dismissing writ petitions seeking condonation of delay and restoration of GST registrations.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 107 CGST Act limitation period condonation of delay GST registration cancellation

Anshul Vaish v. Hari Om and Co. and Anr.

07 Feb 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:733

Delhi High Court allowed rectification petition cancelling respondent's trademark registration for deceptive similarity and bad faith use of petitioner's prior 'ROHIT' mark in PVC pipes.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant trademark infringement prior user deceptive similarity trade mark registration

RAIN CII CARBON VIZAG LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

07 Feb 2025 · HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA · 2025:DHC:1498-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction and held that the doctrine of forum conveniens precluded it from entertaining the petition challenging DGFT orders primarily connected to Hyderabad.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 Constitution of India territorial jurisdiction doctrine of forum conveniens cause of action

Nishant v. Union of India

06 Feb 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:956-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a medical disqualification based on Syndactyly for police recruitment, directing a fresh examination with specialist input as per medical guidelines.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Syndactyly Medical Examination Recruitment Guidelines Orthopaedic Specialist