Delhi High Court
99,506 judgments
Shivashish Shubham v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension and arrears with interest to petitioners similarly placed as in earlier judgments, subject to verification.
Shivashish Shubham v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to verify and grant pro rata pension benefits with arrears to petitioners similarly placed as in earlier judgments, subject to verification and procedural safeguards.
Nidhi Malik v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to decide the petitioner’s fresh transfer application within eight weeks, uninfluenced by earlier dismissal on limitation grounds.
Anjali Bhargava and Anr. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that directors disqualified prior to 7th May 2018 retain directorships in other companies and may have their DIN and DSC reactivated under the Companies Fresh Start Scheme, 2020 to enable compliance and fresh start.
Anant Narain & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed reactivation of DIN and DSC for directors disqualified due to struck off companies under the CFSS-2020 scheme to enable fresh business activities.
EX CPL LALIT KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the Indian Air Force to grant pro rata pension and arrears to petitioners similarly placed as in earlier judgments, subject to verification, with interest payable on delayed payments.
Sandeep alias Bhopali v. The State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the conviction and sentence under Sections 354 and 451 IPC for outraging the modesty of a woman and trespass, finding the prosecution evidence credible and intoxication no defense.
Savita Gupta v. India Post Payments Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court held that an employee remains a probationer until formally confirmed, set aside her stigmatic termination for lack of inquiry, and granted back wages for the termination period while upholding the employer's right to verify eligibility post-appointment.
Kalicharan @ Kalka Prasad v. The State (G.N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act based on credible complainant testimony despite absence of medical or forensic evidence.
Francis Joseph v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that demolition orders must be preceded by giving the affected party an opportunity of hearing, modifying the impugned order accordingly.
Union of India v. S P Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition, holding that excess transport allowance paid due to non-functional upgrades without employee fraud should not be recovered.
Abhimanyu Mor v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that while a Review Medical Board is discretionary, conflicting medical opinions warrant directing an RMB to reassess the petitioner’s fitness for service.
Mohammed Isham v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that government employees not provided family accommodation are entitled to full HRA as per rules, directing payment of arrears with interest despite absence of outliving permission.
GEO GPT JV v. POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD
The Delhi High Court granted an extension of time until 31st March 2021 to the Arbitral Tribunal to complete arbitration proceedings under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, on consent of the parties.
ICICI Bank Ltd v. Manish Goel & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that respondents wilfully disobeyed an injunction restraining them from sending emails against the petitioner bank, issued notice of contempt, and directed their personal appearance for further proceedings.
Pushpa Jhanji & Anr v. Pawan Chopra & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition alleging violation of a consent order related to housing society membership and upheld the legality of eviction and sealing actions taken after due process.
Danish Khan @ Saahil v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court held that anticipatory bail under section 438 Cr.P.C. is maintainable and granted to the accused as no prima facie case under section 3(2)(v) of the SCST Act was made out, and the bar under section 18 of the Act did not apply.
Rajan Bhandari & Anr v. Shriniwas Verma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the eviction decree passed under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC based on admitted tenancy and rent arrears, affirming the trial court's possession order.
Vinay v. The State; Raj Tilak v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellants' convictions for robbery and assault but reduced their sentence under Section 394 IPC to the period already served, ordering their immediate release.
Vinay v. The State; Raj Tilak v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellants' convictions for robbery and assault but reduced their sentences under Section 394 IPC to the period already served, considering mitigating factors.