Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Center of Applied Politics v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging cancellation of a lease agreement for institutional land due to the appellant's prolonged non-compliance with construction and sanction conditions.
Seema Tripathi v. PCIT -7, New Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition challenging rejection of an application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme for waiver of interest caused by departmental delay in refunding advance tax, directing reconsideration on merits.
Neelima Sharma @ Bhakti Sharma v. Shri Satyavrat Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition and granted a preliminary decree of partition, holding that an oral will was invalid and the suit for partition was within limitation with fixed court fees applicable due to joint possession.
M/S. JANKI MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. v. M/S. SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227 challenging the Arbitral Tribunal’s order closing the petitioner’s right to file Statement of Defence, holding that judicial interference in arbitration is permissible only in exceptional cases of perversity.
Ravi Prakash Yadav v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner was entitled to pay protection despite joining after the IDA notification, and recovery of excess pay after long duration without misrepresentation is impermissible.
Sh. Vijay Bansal v. Smt. Beena Tripathi
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal based on the appellant's binding undertaking to vacate the property within six months and pay rent and user charges during this period.
Om Parkash Dang v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide the regularization of land allotment within twelve weeks, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Rakesh Tokas v. Ms Shilpa Shinde
The Delhi High Court disposed of a contempt petition against Delhi Jal Board for non-compliance with pipeline laying directions, accepting assurances of prompt action and granting liberty to revive if default occurs.
Tarkeshwar Singh @ Rakesh Singh v. State Through SHO PS Naraina
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to prolonged trial delay and lack of independent witnesses, emphasizing the primacy of Article 21 rights over statutory bail restrictions.
Abdul Rashid Sheikh v. NIA
A sitting MP under lawful detention has no enforceable right to attend Parliament sessions, but limited custody parole may be granted to protect fundamental rights when bail applications are delayed due to jurisdictional issues.
Chander Bahadur v. Bishamber Sahai and Sons
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Labour Court's refusal to restore a withdrawn industrial dispute claim, holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to inquire into the withdrawal made by the petitioner's authorized representative without timely challenge.
S.K. Singhal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the disciplinary dismissal of a postal employee, affirming the Appellate Authority's power to enhance punishment under CCS (CCA) Rules and validating procedural fairness and evidence relied upon.
Neeraj Gupta @ Neeraj Dengre v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case, holding that bail is appropriate where custodial interrogation is unnecessary and the accused has joined investigation.
Santosh Kumar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an SC/ST Act case, emphasizing the necessity of public humiliation for caste-based offences and noting discrepancies in the prosecution’s case.
Abhijeet Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Victim M
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a rape case arising from a broken consensual relationship, emphasizing the distinction between consensual sex and rape and the need to prevent misuse of criminal law.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Anju Gupta
Delhi High Court modified motor accident compensation award by recalculating deceased's income, affirming dependency despite independent incomes, adjusting compensation heads, and reducing interest rate to 9% per annum.
Svamaan Financial Services Private Limited v. Sammaan Capital Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants' adoption of deceptively similar 'SAMMAAN' marks infringed the plaintiff's prior registered 'SVAMAAN' trademarks in identical financial services, granting interim injunction against the defendants.
Sammaan Finserv Limited v. Svamaan Financial Services Private Limited
The Delhi High Court admitted appeals challenging an injunction restraining use of the mark "SAMMAAN" for financial services, held that the question of deceptive similarity and likelihood of confusion requires detailed consideration, and directed continuation of the status quo pending final hearing.
Subhash Wadhwa v. Kuldeep Singh
The Delhi High Court held that a suit filed after a 20-year delay is barred by limitation and not saved by Section 14 of the Limitation Act when the prior suit was dismissed on merits, ordering rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Puneet Kumar Vohra v. Director General, Border Security Force & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal to grant further extension or revive a lapsed appointment offer to the BSF, holding that revival requires exceptional circumstances and Ministry approval.