Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Surender Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging service matters of an Army personnel, directing the petitioner to seek remedy before the Armed Forces Tribunal as per statutory provisions.
Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corp. Ltd. v. M/S Brandavan Food Products
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award for reimbursement of Welcome Drink costs but set aside the award for additional payment for Second Regular Meals, affirming the limited scope of judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration Act.
Allied Blenders and Distillers Limited v. Boutique Spirit Brands Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's trademark registrations for 'BSB MYRON' due to deceptive similarity with the petitioner's prior registered mark 'KYRON' in the alcoholic beverages sector.
Biswajit Ghosh & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioners' appointment applications within eight weeks, balancing expeditious decision-making with procedural fairness.
Sonu Sahani v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioner’s appointment suitability within eight weeks and to communicate reasons if found unsuitable, ensuring timely and transparent administrative action.
Amit Kumar Ram & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioners' appointment applications within eight weeks, emphasizing timely and reasoned administrative action.
Arvind Kushwah v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioner's application within eight weeks and mandated communication of reasons if found unsuitable, ensuring timely and transparent administrative action.
Parmar Dishantkumar Subhashbhai v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioner's application within eight weeks and provide reasons if found unsuitable, ensuring timely and transparent administrative action.
Ritesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioner’s application within eight weeks, emphasizing timely administrative action and reasoned communication if found unsuitable.
Sonia v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the medical board's finding of unfitness due to overweight, holding that medical fitness is determined at fixed examinations and subsequent reports cannot alter the decision.
Nilesh Girkar v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's rejection of a copyright infringement suit for lack of territorial cause of action, clarifying the distinction between plaint rejection and return under CPC and remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Alok Kumar Das v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR alleging dowry harassment and bigamy, holding that prima facie evidence of marriage exists and the criminal trial must proceed.
New Airways Travels Pvt. Ltd. v. S.K. Gupta & Anr.
The High Court held that revision under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act is maintainable only against eviction orders under specified sections, and dismissed the petition challenging an execution order not covered by those provisions.
Jayant Singh Raghav v. The Vice Chairman Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that existing private residential buildings are not mandatorily required to be retrofitted to comply with accessibility standards under the RPwD Act and Rules, dismissing the petition challenging the closure of a disability rights complaint.
Hitesh Kumar and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The High Court set aside a non-speaking summoning order lacking reasons and remanded the matter for reconsideration with directions to apply judicial mind and record reasons before issuing process.
Mohd. Bablu & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR involving serious allegations and contradictory complainant statements, holding that the matter requires trial to determine the truth.
M/S Legacy Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that an agreement or approval from government authorities is not a mandatory requirement for claiming deduction under Section 80IC, setting aside the ITAT's contrary order.
Ashish v. Satpal Singh @ Talwar
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to material contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing the need for confidence in sole testimony before conviction.
Jagvir Singh v. Delhi Medical Council & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Delhi Medical Council’s order prohibiting a vocational certificate holder from practising allopathic medicine without registration, allowing only limited community health activities.
The Motor & General Finance Ltd v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a delayed tax assessment order under the NDMC Act, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal remedies for disputed factual issues including delay.