Delhi High Court
37,243 judgments
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Anju Gupta
Delhi High Court modified motor accident compensation award by recalculating deceased's income, affirming dependency despite independent incomes, adjusting compensation heads, and reducing interest rate to 9% per annum.
Svamaan Financial Services Private Limited v. Sammaan Capital Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants' adoption of deceptively similar 'SAMMAAN' marks infringed the plaintiff's prior registered 'SVAMAAN' trademarks in identical financial services, granting interim injunction against the defendants.
Sammaan Finserv Limited v. Svamaan Financial Services Private Limited
The Delhi High Court admitted appeals challenging an injunction restraining use of the mark "SAMMAAN" for financial services, held that the question of deceptive similarity and likelihood of confusion requires detailed consideration, and directed continuation of the status quo pending final hearing.
Subhash Wadhwa v. Kuldeep Singh
The Delhi High Court held that a suit filed after a 20-year delay is barred by limitation and not saved by Section 14 of the Limitation Act when the prior suit was dismissed on merits, ordering rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Puneet Kumar Vohra v. Director General, Border Security Force & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging refusal to grant further extension or revive a lapsed appointment offer to the BSF, holding that revival requires exceptional circumstances and Ministry approval.
Surender Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging service matters of an Army personnel, directing the petitioner to seek remedy before the Armed Forces Tribunal as per statutory provisions.
Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corp. Ltd. v. M/S Brandavan Food Products
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award for reimbursement of Welcome Drink costs but set aside the award for additional payment for Second Regular Meals, affirming the limited scope of judicial interference under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration Act.
Allied Blenders and Distillers Limited v. Boutique Spirit Brands Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's trademark registrations for 'BSB MYRON' due to deceptive similarity with the petitioner's prior registered mark 'KYRON' in the alcoholic beverages sector.
Biswajit Ghosh & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioners' appointment applications within eight weeks, balancing expeditious decision-making with procedural fairness.
Sonu Sahani v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioner’s appointment suitability within eight weeks and to communicate reasons if found unsuitable, ensuring timely and transparent administrative action.
Amit Kumar Ram & Ors. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioners' appointment applications within eight weeks, emphasizing timely and reasoned administrative action.
Arvind Kushwah v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioner's application within eight weeks and mandated communication of reasons if found unsuitable, ensuring timely and transparent administrative action.
Parmar Dishantkumar Subhashbhai v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioner's application within eight weeks and provide reasons if found unsuitable, ensuring timely and transparent administrative action.
Ritesh Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF Standing Screening Committee to decide the petitioner’s application within eight weeks, emphasizing timely administrative action and reasoned communication if found unsuitable.
Sonia v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the medical board's finding of unfitness due to overweight, holding that medical fitness is determined at fixed examinations and subsequent reports cannot alter the decision.
Nilesh Girkar v. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's rejection of a copyright infringement suit for lack of territorial cause of action, clarifying the distinction between plaint rejection and return under CPC and remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Alok Kumar Das v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR alleging dowry harassment and bigamy, holding that prima facie evidence of marriage exists and the criminal trial must proceed.
New Airways Travels Pvt. Ltd. v. S.K. Gupta & Anr.
The High Court held that revision under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act is maintainable only against eviction orders under specified sections, and dismissed the petition challenging an execution order not covered by those provisions.
Jayant Singh Raghav v. The Vice Chairman Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that existing private residential buildings are not mandatorily required to be retrofitted to comply with accessibility standards under the RPwD Act and Rules, dismissing the petition challenging the closure of a disability rights complaint.
Hitesh Kumar and Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The High Court set aside a non-speaking summoning order lacking reasons and remanded the matter for reconsideration with directions to apply judicial mind and record reasons before issuing process.