Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
OZAR HOMES LLP v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court held that the highest bidder in a public auction has no vested right to acceptance of the bid and upheld the DDA's lawful rejection of the petitioner's highest bid based on reasoned market value considerations.
D. Arjun @ Devender Arjun v. State, NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a murder case, holding that mere presence at the crime scene without direct evidence of causing injury does not justify denial of bail, subject to conditions safeguarding the trial process.
Mushir Alam v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to prolonged trial delay and incarceration, dispensing with Section 37 conditions to uphold the accused's fundamental rights.
M/S Bihar Lal Manoj Kumar v. Deepak Sharma
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant an extension to vacate the premises until 31.05.2025 on payment of user charges and compliance with conditions, staying the eviction order subject to an undertaking.
Surinder Kumar v. Karamvir Tyagi
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of user charges and filing an undertaking, staying the eviction order until 30.04.2025.
Mr. Abdul Sattar v. Hameeda Shahzad
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to increased user charges and an undertaking, staying eviction execution until 30.09.2025.
Jasvinder Singh v. The Chairman DDA and Ors
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking demolition of unauthorized construction, directing the petitioner to pursue complaints before the Supreme Court constituted Special Task Force and urging cooperation between DDA and MCD.
HIMALAYA GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD. v. RAJASTHAN AUSHDHALAYA PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants infringed the plaintiffs' 'Liv.52' trademark by using the deceptively similar 'Liv-333' mark, allowed the suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' failure to file written statement, and awarded injunction, costs, and damages.
Discovery Drilling Pte Limited v. Parmod Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Singapore International Commercial Court is a superior Court under Section 44A CPC, allowing enforcement of its judgment in India despite respondents' jurisdictional and procedural objections.
Ashok Kumar Jha v. Vijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging dismissal of a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act for unlawful dispossession, holding that the petitioner failed to prove possession or forcible dispossession after a final eviction order.
MRP (Identity Withheld) v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld charges under Section 354 IPC for outraging modesty of a minor but set aside charges under Section 10 POCSO Act due to absence of sexual intent and emphasized the necessity of reasoned orders at the charge framing stage.
Om Gupta v. State of Delhi NCT
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging discharge of accused due to absence of fresh evidence in supplementary chargesheet and lack of application of mind in summoning order.
Sumit Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a CRPF constable accused of serious offences after considering the stage of trial, lack of substantiated threat, and the accused's societal ties.
Mahesh@Vikram v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed parole to a long-incarcerated prisoner, holding that stale misconduct cannot bar parole when recent conduct is satisfactory and humanitarian grounds exist.
Jitendra v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to prolonged trial delay and incarceration, dispensing with Section 37 restrictions in light of Article 21 protections.
Chander Prakash Alias Pappu v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that unwillingness of a convict’s family to furnish surety is not sufficient to dispense with surety conditions for furlough, emphasizing the need to balance individual rights with public interest and risk of absconding.
Sarfraz Ahmed v. UCO Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed UCO Bank to release amounts under two Fixed Deposit Receipts to the petitioner holding a Succession Certificate, emphasizing the bank's obligation despite claims of missing records.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition as the petitioner intended to approach the Tribunal, disposing of the petition accordingly.
Arcturus Therapeutics Inc v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against refusal of a patent application based solely on procedural delay, remanding the matter for fresh consideration on merits.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Court held that the CBI must produce the Final Report Part-I in a sealed cover for judicial perusal at the cognizance stage under exceptional circumstances, balancing confidentiality with the Court's duty to scrutinize the investigation.