Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Surinder Kumar v. Karamvir Tyagi
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of user charges and filing an undertaking, staying the eviction order until 30.04.2025.
Mr. Abdul Sattar v. Hameeda Shahzad
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to increased user charges and an undertaking, staying eviction execution until 30.09.2025.
Jasvinder Singh v. The Chairman DDA and Ors
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking demolition of unauthorized construction, directing the petitioner to pursue complaints before the Supreme Court constituted Special Task Force and urging cooperation between DDA and MCD.
HIMALAYA GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD. v. RAJASTHAN AUSHDHALAYA PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants infringed the plaintiffs' 'Liv.52' trademark by using the deceptively similar 'Liv-333' mark, allowed the suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' failure to file written statement, and awarded injunction, costs, and damages.
Discovery Drilling Pte Limited v. Parmod Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Singapore International Commercial Court is a superior Court under Section 44A CPC, allowing enforcement of its judgment in India despite respondents' jurisdictional and procedural objections.
Ashok Kumar Jha v. Vijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging dismissal of a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act for unlawful dispossession, holding that the petitioner failed to prove possession or forcible dispossession after a final eviction order.
MRP (Identity Withheld) v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld charges under Section 354 IPC for outraging modesty of a minor but set aside charges under Section 10 POCSO Act due to absence of sexual intent and emphasized the necessity of reasoned orders at the charge framing stage.
Om Gupta v. State of Delhi NCT
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging discharge of accused due to absence of fresh evidence in supplementary chargesheet and lack of application of mind in summoning order.
Sumit Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a CRPF constable accused of serious offences after considering the stage of trial, lack of substantiated threat, and the accused's societal ties.
Mahesh@Vikram v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed parole to a long-incarcerated prisoner, holding that stale misconduct cannot bar parole when recent conduct is satisfactory and humanitarian grounds exist.
Jitendra v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to prolonged trial delay and incarceration, dispensing with Section 37 restrictions in light of Article 21 protections.
Chander Prakash Alias Pappu v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that unwillingness of a convict’s family to furnish surety is not sufficient to dispense with surety conditions for furlough, emphasizing the need to balance individual rights with public interest and risk of absconding.
Sarfraz Ahmed v. UCO Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed UCO Bank to release amounts under two Fixed Deposit Receipts to the petitioner holding a Succession Certificate, emphasizing the bank's obligation despite claims of missing records.
Rajesh Kumar v. Union of India
The High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition as the petitioner intended to approach the Tribunal, disposing of the petition accordingly.
Arcturus Therapeutics Inc v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against refusal of a patent application based solely on procedural delay, remanding the matter for fresh consideration on merits.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Court held that the CBI must produce the Final Report Part-I in a sealed cover for judicial perusal at the cognizance stage under exceptional circumstances, balancing confidentiality with the Court's duty to scrutinize the investigation.
Fasttrack Tieup Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that secured creditors' rights under a hypothecation agreement prevail over Income Tax Department's prohibitory orders, allowing the release of auctioned helicopters to the petitioner.
Bihar Olympic Association v. President Indian Olympic Association & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the IOA President cannot unilaterally appoint an Ad-Hoc Committee to manage a State Olympic Association without due process and ratification, setting aside the impugned orders for violation of natural justice and IOA Constitution.
M/S Rajasthan Patrika Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that absence of prior NOC does not bar conducting an aeronautical study for height clearance of a building near an airport and directed such study to be conducted, setting aside the rejection orders.
Roadwings International Private Limited v. Container Corporation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a settlement agreement under the Vivad Se Vishwas-II Scheme, having the status of an arbitral award, is final and binding, and cannot be re-opened in writ proceedings absent credible evidence of coercion.