Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Asitav Mohanty v. Union of India & Anr.

25 Feb 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:1234-DB

The Delhi High Court held that below-benchmark gradings in ACRs affecting promotion benefits must be communicated to employees to enable representation, and non-communication violates Article 14, directing grant of NFSG to the petitioner.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Annual Confidential Report Non-Functional Selection Grade below-benchmark grading communication of ACR entries

Sudesh & Anr v. Jitender Kumar Bhardwaj & Ors

25 Feb 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1741

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenants' revision petition upholding the Rent Controller's eviction order, affirming jurisdiction, bona fide landlord requirement, and directing payment of user charges.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 jurisdiction landlord-tenant relationship bona fide requirement

Mohd Iqbal v. State NCT of Delhi

25 Feb 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:1584

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for sexual assault under the POCSO Act and sexual harassment under IPC based on the prosecutrix's credible testimony corroborated by CCTV footage and the appellant's admissions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act sexual assault sole testimony CCTV evidence

Babban Giri & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi

25 Feb 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:1482

The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's framing of charges against accused persons, holding that at the charge stage only a prima facie case is required and discrepancies or defence evidence cannot be considered.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant charge framing prima facie case Section 164 Cr.P.C. discrepancies in FIR

Shanti Upadhyay v. Sr. Divisional Manager of New India Assurance Company Ltd. & Anr.

25 Feb 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1279
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court directed the Insurance Ombudsman to adjudicate the petitioner's medical insurance claim afresh under statutory rules after the insurer's repeated rejection of a same-day hospitalization claim.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Insurance Ombudsman Rules, 2017 hospitalization benefit medical insurance claim same-day treatment

Sandeep Kapoor v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) & Anr.

25 Feb 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1296

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287, 337, and 338 IPC following an amicable settlement and compensation paid to the injured party, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482/528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 528 BNSS compromise

Devesh Bhardwaj v. State & Anr.

25 Feb 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:1215

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the chargesheet under Section 376 IPC, holding that factual disputes about consent and false promises of marriage must be decided by the trial court.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 482 CrPC Section 376 IPC quashing of chargesheet false promise of marriage

Sodan Singh Rawat v. Vipinta

25 Feb 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:1218

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s maintenance award, ruling that only mandatory statutory deductions can reduce a husband's income for maintenance calculation, rejecting loan EMIs as deductions and affirming the wife's entitlement to maintenance.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance Section 125 CrPC mandatory deductions loan EMIs

Sh. Satya Prakash & Anr. v. State & Anr.

25 Feb 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:1216

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR No. 96/2017 alleging assault and outraging modesty, holding that quashing is not warranted at the investigation stage amid cross-FIRs with conflicting allegations.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR cross-FIR outraging modesty

Tribhuvan; Ishaan Malhotra; Vikash Kumar v. Ram Swaroop Dagar

25 Feb 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1281-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Staff Selection Commission to comply with the CAT order within three weeks while clarifying that the order shall not be treated as a precedent.

administrative petition_allowed Procedural Central Administrative Tribunal compliance precedent writ petition

Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Rohanpal Singh

25 Feb 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 379

The Delhi High Court upheld the requirement that blood pressure must be measured over three days before declaring a candidate medically unfit for Delhi Police recruitment, following established guidelines applicable to paramilitary forces.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant medical examination recruitment hypertension blood pressure

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Manish Kumar

25 Feb 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1287-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for a dermatologist to examine the candidate for a tattoo on the right forearm, affirming the recruitment criteria and declining to interfere.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal tattoo dermatologist examination Delhi Police recruitment

Yashvardhan v. Union of India & Anr.

25 Feb 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:1310

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking compassionate appointment, holding that the family's substantial financial resources preclude eligibility under the Scheme for Compassionate Appointment.

administrative petition_dismissed compassionate appointment Scheme for Compassionate Appointment financial destitution government servant death

Ms. Ranjana Roy Gawai v. Union of India

25 Feb 2025 · Manoj Jain

The Delhi High Court held that pledged shares must be released upon full loan repayment despite delay, allowing writ petitions against IFCI Limited for unlawful retention of shares.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pledge of shares loan repayment release of pledged shares writ petition maintainability

State v. Shivji

25 Feb 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:1217
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a minor's sexual assault case, emphasizing that appellate interference in acquittals requires perversity or illegality in the trial court's findings.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant sexual assault minor victim acquittal appeal against acquittal

Central Board of Secondary Education v. Ravindra Singh

25 Feb 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1285-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a Tribunal order that merely recorded submissions on territorial jurisdiction, holding such a petition not maintainable.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition territorial jurisdiction Tribunal Original Application

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. WGF Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.

25 Feb 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:1228-DB

The Delhi High Court held that bad debts written off on guarantees given outside the ordinary course of business are not allowable deductions under Section 36(2)(i) of the Income Tax Act, setting aside the ITAT's deletion of disallowance.

tax appeal_allowed Significant bad debts Section 36(2)(i) Income Tax Act, 1961 guarantee commission

Saurabh Pruthi v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd

25 Feb 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:1398-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that an unchallenged test report showing a slow electricity meter entitles the licensee to recover charges for up to six months under Regulation 38(f) of the DERC Supply Code, dismissing the consumer's appeal against the billing.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant electricity meter defect DERC Supply Code 2007 Regulation 38(f) meter running slow

Vikram Dwivedi and Paramhans Sahani v. Power Finance Corporation Ltd

25 Feb 2025 · Vibhu BakhrU; Tejas Karia · 2025:DHC:1222-DB

The Delhi High Court held that electronic filing date governs limitation for written statements under the RDB Act and condoned delay based on special circumstances, setting aside the DRT's rejection of the petitioner's condonation application.

civil petition_allowed Significant condonation of delay written statement electronic filing Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993

Virender Kumar and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi

25 Feb 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:1219

The High Court acquitted the petitioners of offences under Sections 186, 332, 353, and 506 IPC due to failure of the prosecution to prove that the complainant police officer was on duty and other critical lapses, setting aside the convictions and sentences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 186 IPC Section 332 IPC Section 353 IPC public servant on duty