Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
Kiranakart Technologies Private Limited v. Mohammad Arshad & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to remove the respondent's 'ZEPTO' trademark registration in class 35 for non-use, affirming that non-use for five years warrants removal under Section 47(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
M/S GCG TRANSGLOBAL HOUSING PROJECT PVT LTD v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition of land has lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as possession was not taken and compensation was not tendered to the petitioner who acquired title prior to Section 4 notification, affirming that subsequent purchasers after notification lack locus to challenge acquisition.
M/S ZHEJIANG BONLY ELEVATOR GUIDE RAIL MANUFACTURE CO. LTD. v. M/S JADE ELEVATOR COMPONENTS & ORS.
Delhi High Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain Section 9 petition as the seat of arbitration was not fixed at Delhi, and Gujarat courts have exclusive jurisdiction given the cause of action and contract connection.
Shri Chand v. Pritam Singh
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of user charges and filing an undertaking, staying eviction execution conditionally.
DS Drinks and Beverages Private Limited v. Hector Beverages Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining the appellant from using the mark 'SWING', holding that the dominant part of the respondent's composite trademark was infringed, likely causing consumer confusion.
Vishul Kapasia v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals seeking relaxation of attendance rules for LL.B. exams, holding that relief under Article 226 requires prior invocation of relaxation provisions before the competent authority.
Yashvardhan Chauhan v. University of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of an LLB student seeking relaxation of mandatory attendance rules due to medical reasons, emphasizing strict adherence to academic discipline and procedural requirements for relief.
Bharat Bhushan Bansal v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the petitioner accused of cheating and misappropriation of funds in a cooperative society, holding that prima facie evidence and absence of undue trial delay justified denial of bail.
Usha v. DSSSB & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition upholding the Tribunal’s refusal to condone a 620-day delay in filing an Original Application, holding that personal hardships without cogent explanation do not justify extension beyond prescribed limitation periods.
M/S Kashish Optics Ltd. v. The Commissioner, CGST Delhi West & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that extension of seizure of goods under the CGST Act beyond six months requires notice and opportunity to be heard, and without such procedural compliance, the extension is invalid and goods must be released.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. BDR Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's decision that the assessee discharged the onus under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act by proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of shareholders, dismissing the revenue's appeal.
Pawan Kumar Garg & Anr. v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court set aside Punjab National Bank's classification of loan accounts as 'fraud' for lack of reasoned order and directed the Bank to issue fresh Show Cause Notices before taking any decision.
Athlesis Eok & Anr. v. Manu Sawhney & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Video Conferencing Rules, 2021 apply to civil cases requiring appointment of a Coordinator for overseas witnesses and that the party requesting video conferencing must bear the expenses, setting aside the trial court's contrary order.
Deepak @ Deepak Singh v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a serious offence case after considering the completion of investigation, absence of criminal antecedents, and the need to uphold personal liberty under Article 21.
Rajesh v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a serious offence case after considering completed investigation, absence of criminal antecedents, and humanitarian grounds, emphasizing that bail is the rule and jail the exception.
Zhinet Banu Nazir Dadany v. Commissioner of Customs New Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld that Customs cannot dispose of non-perishable seized goods without notice and directed refund of value with interest, ordering market value compensation for delayed payment.
Devender Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted furlough to a prisoner who, despite prior failure to surrender, demonstrated good conduct and completed sentence in a subsequent case, emphasizing that prior misconduct alone cannot bar furlough.
Laxmi Dhar v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding property mutation within eight weeks without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Joydeb Das v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s belated claim for pension benefits for a period of court leave, holding that delay and laches barred the claim and that a court’s direction to consider a stale representation does not revive the cause of action.
Shazeb v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to prolonged pre-trial detention and delay in trial, dispensing with the stringent bail conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.