Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Meenu Saluja v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi) & Amandeep Singh

06 Mar 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1513

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging interim bail granted to an accused in a murder case on compassionate grounds related to his child's Board Examination, emphasizing the balance between accused's rights and public interest.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant interim bail compassionate grounds Board Examination Article 21

Mohd Shoeb Ali v. The Banking Ombudsman & Ors.

06 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1507

The Delhi High Court directed the Banking Ombudsman to decide the petitioner's cyber fraud complaint within eight weeks, treating the writ petition as a representation, without adjudicating on the merits.

administrative petition_allowed Banking Ombudsman cyber fraud time-bound decision writ petition

Abhishek Gupta v. State Bank of India

06 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1505

The Delhi High Court set aside a bank's fraud classification order for non-supply of the forensic audit report to the account holder, directing fresh consideration after affording an opportunity to respond.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant fraud classification forensic audit report natural justice show-cause notice

Nakul Manuja v. Delhi Development Authority

06 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1504

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning an erroneous deposit by treating it as a representation and directed the respondent authority to decide the matter expeditiously with procedural fairness.

administrative petition_dismissed erroneous deposit writ petition representation administrative decision

Kundan Kumar @ Gore v. Central Bureau of Investigation

06 Mar 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:1465

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, holding that no mandatory Section 41A CrPC notice was issued before arrest and that disclosure statements of co-accused without corroboration are insufficient to deny bail during ongoing investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 41A CrPC Section 160 CrPC disclosure statement

Rattan India Power Ltd v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd

06 Mar 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:1464

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim arbitral award based on admissions in minutes of meetings and issuance of C-forms, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(6) Section 34 Order XII Rule 6 CPC

Rajesh Breja v. The State

06 Mar 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1489

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a criminal conspiracy case, holding that mere apprehensions without concrete evidence cannot justify denial of bail once investigation is complete and charge sheet filed.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail conspiracy Section 120B IPC Section 115 IPC

C Sharma v. Navdeep Singh & Ors.

06 Mar 2025 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2025:DHC:1462

The High Court upheld the dismissal of a criminal complaint and revision petition due to inherently improbable allegations and lack of sufficient grounds to summon the accused.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 203 Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C. Article 227 Constitution of India dismissal of complaint

Sanjay Sushil Bhosale v. Yogesh Gupta

06 Mar 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:1565

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's refusal to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that summons were duly served and no sufficient cause was shown for non-appearance.

civil appeal_dismissed ex-parte judgment Order IX Rule 13 CPC sufficient cause service of summons

Psychotropic India Limited v. Meridian Medicare Ltd. and Anr.

06 Mar 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:2161

The Delhi High Court cancelled respondent's trademark 'TROMA' for pharmaceutical goods, holding it deceptively similar and dishonestly adopted, affirming petitioner's prior rights.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement prior user deceptive similarity dishonest adoption

Under Armour Inc. v. Ashwani & Anr.

06 Mar 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:2156
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's deceptively similar 'AU' trademark registration in favour of Under Armour Inc., affirming the petitioner's prior rights and ordering rectification of the trademark register.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement deceptive similarity passing off rectification of trademark register

Chintala Rama Mohan Rao v. State of NCT of Delhi

05 Mar 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:2200

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust in a business dispute involving stone crushing units, holding that prima facie offences were made out and the criminal case could proceed.

criminal petition_dismissed quashing of FIR Section 420 IPC Section 406 IPC Section 120-B IPC

Greesh Verma Jairath v. The State NCT of Delhi

05 Mar 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1762

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of FIRs alleging molestation and intimidation in a family property dispute, holding that the allegations prima facie disclose offences and are not malicious or frivolous.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR family dispute malicious prosecution

Anwar Shekh v. State of Haryana & Ors.

05 Mar 2025 · Sachin Datta, J. · 2025:DHC:1681
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for compensation for malicious prosecution under Article 226, holding that such claims require detailed factual adjudication in appropriate forums and cannot be decided in writ proceedings without incontrovertible evidence of fundamental rights violations.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant malicious prosecution compensation wrongful arrest Article 226

Dr. Smita Naram v. Registrar of Trademarks

05 Mar 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:1616

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a trademark opposition for non-prosecution due to non-receipt of hearing notices and restored the opposition for fresh hearing.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark opposition Rule 56(4) Trademark Rules 2002 Non-prosecution dismissal Hearing notice service

Puneet Solanki v. Nidhi Solanki

05 Mar 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1582

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging interim maintenance granted under the Domestic Violence Act, holding that detailed financial contentions are to be considered at the final stage and not at the interim maintenance stage.

criminal petition_dismissed interim maintenance Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 482 Cr.P.C. income assessment

Dr. Jatinder Bali v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

05 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1481-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to file a review petition before the Central Administrative Tribunal, without expressing any opinion on the merits.

administrative appeal_dismissed writ petition withdrawal review petition Central Administrative Tribunal

Commissioner of Police v. Pratap Singh

05 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1471-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order quashing departmental proceedings against police officers discharged in criminal cases due to lack of valid sanction, dismissing the police's writ petition.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant departmental enquiry discharge in criminal case non-obtaining of sanction Prevention of Corruption Act

Bhupender Singh v. M/S Olive Exim

05 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1460

The Delhi High Court disposed of a tenancy dispute petition following an amicable settlement with the petitioner undertaking to vacate and hand over possession of the premises by a specified date.

civil petition_allowed amicable settlement tenancy dispute vacant possession undertaking

SI Anil v. Danish

05 Mar 2025 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2025:DHC:1294
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the acquittal of accused persons in a robbery and assault case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt amid inconsistencies and investigative lapses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant acquittal appellate interference reasonable doubt appreciation of evidence