Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
Mahipal Singh & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar Kaushik & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that only the Court, not the Registrar, can close the right to file replication under the High Court Rules, and set aside the Registrar's orders closing replication rights as jurisdictionally erroneous.
Kumari Gayatri Tripathi v. Trust Mandir Shri Ramchanderji
The Delhi High Court held that title disputes cannot be adjudicated in eviction proceedings under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, and upheld the eviction order dismissing the tenant's claim of ownership and plea of res judicata.
Eureka Forbes Limited v. Om Sai Enterprises and Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a suit for permanent injunction, damages, and costs against a defendant for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off due to non-contestation and use of counterfeit products.
EUREKA FORBES LIMITED v. MR. VINOD K. AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against a defendant for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off, decreeing the suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendant's non-appearance.
Sanja Gupta v. Prachin Gaur
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate the premises subject to payment of monthly user charges and compliance with an undertaking, staying the eviction order till 31.12.2025.
RV Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Randhir Kumar
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate a contractual payment dispute after finding valid service and existence of an arbitration agreement.
Vadim Infrastructure Private Limited v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator to adjudicate contractual disputes between Vadim Infrastructure and BHEL, emphasizing the court's power to intervene when the designated authority is unable or unwilling to appoint an arbitrator.
Vasudev v. Roop Kumari Thr LRs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s decree granting possession and damages to the Plaintiff, holding that the Defendant failed to prove title or continuous possession through unregistered documents and that the probate order conclusively established the Plaintiff’s ownership.
Chasvinder Singh v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)
The High Court set aside the order summoning the petitioner under Section 319 Cr.P.C. due to lack of strong evidence and held that such power must be exercised sparingly and not on afterthought allegations.
V K Mishra v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal’s refusal to adjudicate a pay scale upgradation claim, remanding the matter for fresh consideration in line with Supreme Court directions.
Pramod Kumar Kaushik v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the legality of the promotion process for Deputy Commandant (Accounts Officer) in ITBPF, clarifying seniority rules under different Recruitment Rules and dismissing the petition challenging the promotion memorandum.
Lauv Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal’s order permitting a Court of Inquiry based on anonymous complaints to proceed subject to leave before any action, leaving substantive issues for the Tribunal’s adjudication.
Mohd Naim Ahmed v. Mohd Imran
Delhi High Court granted extension to vacate tenanted premises subject to payment of user charges and compliance with conditions, staying eviction order till 30.09.2025.
Suresh Kumar v. Sheela Goel
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of user charges and an undertaking, staying eviction execution until 31.12.2025.
Suraj @ Devender v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a murder and robbery case, holding that circumstantial evidence without corroboration and forensic support is insufficient to deny bail.
Kunal Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of the court's process.
Rahul Vattamparambil Remesh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that detention and penalty on personal gold jewellery without proper show cause notice and hearing under Section 124 of the Customs Act is illegal and ordered release of the jewellery.
Rakesh Sharma v. Ashok
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for the death of a child in a motor accident by applying minimum wages criteria, future prospects, and appropriate multiplier, overruling the outdated notional income method under the deleted Second Schedule.
Rakesh Kumar Bansal v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions directing petitioners to pay penal interest and balance amount within two weeks for allotment processing, emphasizing the order is not a precedent.
Pintu @ Bintu v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a warning for late surrender does not bar furlough eligibility under prison rules and granted furlough to a life convict with satisfactory conduct despite a five-day delay in surrender.