Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Devi Charan & Anr. v. Ranpat Singh & Ors.
The High Court held that the execution court cannot modify a decree by apportioning possession beyond the site plan boundaries and must execute the decree as per its terms without re-assessing property measurement.
Som Dutt Sharma v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to an accused found with commercial quantity of cocaine, holding that stringent conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not met and procedural lapses did not justify bail.
Shri Ruchit Bansal & Anr. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the exclusion of BSIV vehicles in a public tender as valid and dismissed the petitioners' claim for contract extension without mutual consent, emphasizing judicial restraint in tender matters and public interest in pollution control.
Prema Ram Ex BSF Constable v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court set aside BSF dismissal order due to non-compliance of procedural safeguards in recording plea of guilty, directing reinstatement with partial back wages.
Vishal Gupta and Ors. v. Rahul Bansal
The Delhi High Court set aside an injunction granted without proper examination of passing off elements, holding that trademark infringement claims require registration and passing off claims require proof of goodwill and misrepresentation.
Interglobe Aviation Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Customs ACC (Import) New Custom House New Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that customs duty under Section 3(7) of the Customs Tariff Act and IGST under Section 5(1) of the IGST Act can coexist on reimported goods, rejecting the petitioners' claim that supply of service classification exempts them from customs duty.
Karan Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging cancellation of candidature due to a mismatch in domicile district details in the application form, emphasizing adherence to recruitment notice conditions and distinguishing minor clerical errors from material discrepancies.
Yamini Mittal v. Delhi High Court through its Registrar General
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a rule limiting candidates admitted to the DHJS Main Examination to twenty times the vacancies, dismissed challenges to reservation seat diversion and additional vacancies, and refused to interfere in the recruitment process.
N v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the discharge of the accused from the rape charge under Section 376 IPC, holding that discrepancies between FIR and Section 164 CrPC statements cannot justify discharge at the charge framing stage and remanded the case for trial.
Vikram Phogat v. Suman
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging interim maintenance awarded under the DV Act, holding that in absence of credible income proof, courts may infer financial capacity and uphold maintenance orders.
Swagath Restaurants v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that additional license fee for increased seating capacity is payable only in the transition year and set aside the demand for further payments in subsequent years under the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010.
Radico Khaitan Limited v. Harish Chouhan
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause contained in invoices constitutes a valid arbitration agreement if parties intend to be governed by it, and referred the dispute to arbitration appointing a sole arbitrator.
X v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging acquittal in a POCSO and IPC sexual offence case, holding that the victim's testimony did not inspire confidence and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Indira Bahuguna and Ors. v. Lt Governor of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition under the 2013 Act does not lapse unless both possession is not taken and compensation is not paid, dismissing the petition claiming lapse of acquisition on non-payment of compensation alone.
Tacon Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. National Highways Authority of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that invocation of an unconditional bank guarantee cannot be restrained except in cases of egregious fraud or special equity causing irretrievable injustice, dismissing the petition seeking such restraint.
PIONEER CORPORATION v. MR. GAURAV KUMAR & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Pioneer Corporation against defendants selling counterfeit goods under its registered PIONEER trademark, decreeing the suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' failure to contest.
Mahipal Singh & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar Kaushik & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that only the Court, not the Registrar, can close the right to file replication under the High Court Rules, and set aside the Registrar's orders closing replication rights as jurisdictionally erroneous.
Kumari Gayatri Tripathi v. Trust Mandir Shri Ramchanderji
The Delhi High Court held that title disputes cannot be adjudicated in eviction proceedings under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, and upheld the eviction order dismissing the tenant's claim of ownership and plea of res judicata.
Eureka Forbes Limited v. Om Sai Enterprises and Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a suit for permanent injunction, damages, and costs against a defendant for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off due to non-contestation and use of counterfeit products.
EUREKA FORBES LIMITED v. MR. VINOD K. AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against a defendant for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off, decreeing the suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendant's non-appearance.