Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
Sunil Tyagi v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Sunil Tyagi in a land fraud case after chargesheet filing, emphasizing no custodial interrogation was needed and imposing conditions to safeguard the investigation.
Ajay Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of criminal charges against a property co-owner for unlawful entry and threats, emphasizing that possession must be recovered only through due legal process.
Kamlesh Khanna v. Geeta Sardana
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the tenant's leave to defend application, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement for eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, and held that alternate accommodations cited by the tenant were unsuitable or unavailable.
Dr. Ravinder Kumar Mehra v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be calculated from the date of retirement, not from a later date fixed by the Tribunal, and allowed the writ petitions accordingly.
Dr. Sushil Kumar Gupta v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be paid from the date of retirement, modifying the Tribunal's order to reflect this principle.
Staff Selection Commission v. Ankesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for a dermatological examination to verify the presence of a tattoo on a police constable aspirant's right forearm, affirming the validity of recruitment fitness criteria under Clause 13.[2].
Union of India v. Gurdeep Singh
The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary penalty orders passed before retirement remain valid and appealable before competent authorities, and Rule 9 of the CCS Pension Rules applies only to post-retirement proceedings.
Pravesh Sachdeva v. Sarita Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order on bona fide requirement grounds, holding that the tenant failed to show a triable issue regarding availability of suitable alternate accommodation and that the landlord is the best judge of premises needed for business.
Dr. Amitesh Khare and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition rendered academic by petitioners' retirement, reserving liberty to raise the legal question in future cases.
Raj Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition for production of a missing girl who had lawfully married, holding that non-disclosure of material facts rendered the petition not maintainable.
Bikash Kumar Jain v. Securities and Exchange Board of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Securities Appellate Tribunal's refusal to condone delay, holding that the petitioner must exhaust the statutory appeal remedy under Section 15Z of the SEBI Act.
Mr. Hem Kumar and Mr. Rajeev Kumar v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging DDA's cancellation of property transfer based on forged documents, directing reconsideration upon civil court's ownership decree.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. Raman Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld 50% contributory negligence on both the stationary truck driver and speeding car driver in a fatal accident, affirmed owner’s vicarious liability despite driver’s fake license, and set aside premature penal interest imposed on the insurer.
Bentwood Seating System (P) Ltd. v. Airport Authority of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that serious allegations of fraud involving fabricated foreign documents render the dispute non-arbitrable and must be adjudicated by civil courts.
Mohd. Munib v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Juvenile Justice Board's determination that the accused juvenile lacked capacity to be tried as an adult, affirmed bail granted under the JJ Act, and dismissed the revision petition challenging these orders.
Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court clarified that provisions for asset restoration costs may be deductible under Section 37 if meeting AS 29 criteria, and held that installation of new cell towers constitutes extension of existing business under Section 36(1)(iii), justifying proportionate interest disallowance.
Johnson & Johnson v. Pritamdas Arora T/A M/s Medserve & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded compensatory and exemplary damages against defendants for deliberate counterfeiting and trademark infringement of Johnson & Johnson's medical devices, emphasizing the grave public health risks involved.
State Bank of India v. M/s. P. P. Jewellers Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State Bank of India's writ petitions challenging adverse remarks made by the Magistrate under Section 14 SARFAESI Act, holding the remarks within jurisdiction and the petitions barred by delay.
Jangeer Singh Trading as Jangeer Singh Kabulshah Agriculture Works v. Yogesh Jangid Trading as Jangid Agro Engineering & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the defendant's bona fide use of his surname as a trademark protected under Section 35 of the Trade Marks Act precludes interim injunction for trademark infringement or passing off against the plaintiff's similar mark.
State v. Firasul Nabi
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a POCSO case, emphasizing that contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroboration warranted benefit of doubt and dismissal of the appeal.