Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Tribhuvan and Vikash Singh v. Geetanjali Mehta

10 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1630-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a belated writ petition challenging a Tribunal order and directed compliance with the order without affirming its correctness.

administrative appeal_dismissed writ petition belated filing Tribunal order compliance

Amirhossein Alizadeh v. The Commissioner of Customs & Ors.

10 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:1611-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the detention of gold ornaments by Customs due to non-issuance and non-service of statutory notices and ordered their release with waiver of storage charges.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs detention Show Cause Notice Order-in-Original natural justice

Sheikh Iqbal Ahmed & Ors. v. Ashwani Kumar Gupta & Ors.

10 Mar 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:1635

The Delhi High Court granted interim relief allowing defendants to use a common passage till 8:30 PM with security arrangements, holding that unilateral restriction of access by co-owners is impermissible and business losses justify injunction under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant common passage interim injunction Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC compromise decree

Ayush Shukla v. National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

10 Mar 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:1607

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking issuance of a call letter in a recruitment process due to the petitioner’s failure to provide the mandatory GATE registration number, emphasizing strict compliance with application requirements.

administrative petition_dismissed recruitment GATE examination application form error call letter

M/S GULSHAN CALENDER CO v. RITU MOONDHRA

10 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1599

The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of user charges and compliance with conditions, staying eviction execution until January 2026.

civil appeal_allowed eviction user charges vacant possession undertaking

Ram Kishor Arora and Ors. v. ICICI Bank Limited and Anr

10 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1596

The Delhi High Court set aside the classification of petitioners' bank accounts as fraud for failure to supply the forensic audit report, directing the bank to provide the report and allow the petitioners to respond before proceeding further.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Forensic Audit Report fraud classification natural justice bank accounts

Prabhash, P.S. DIU, North v. Trishla Jain

10 Mar 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1581

The Delhi High Court upheld directions for FIR registration and disciplinary action against police officials for dereliction of duty in failing to register FIR promptly despite cognizable offence disclosure, emphasizing mandatory FIR registration and judicial restraint in adverse remarks.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant FIR registration Section 156(3) CrPC Section 302 IPC dereliction of duty

Nitesh Yadav v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

10 Mar 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1580

The Delhi High Court set aside the discharge of accused in a cheque dishonour case, holding that minor discrepancies and overwritten dates do not invalidate the cheque or demand notice, and directed trial on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonour Discrepancy in cheque amount Overwritten date on cheque

Bluefire Infotax Consultancy Pvt Ltd & Ors. v. Ans Infratech Pvt Ltd

10 Mar 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:1571

The Delhi High Court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal's interim order restraining alienation of shares pending arbitration, emphasizing minimal judicial interference and rejecting the appellants' contention that the SPA was a determinable or contingent contract barring interim relief.

commercial_arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 interim relief Share Purchase Agreement Specific Relief Act, 1963

M/S. ARSS Infrastructure Projects Ltd v. National Highway and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd

10 Mar 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:1570
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a settlement reached through conciliation under the contract is enforceable as an arbitral award, barring arbitration and dismissing the petition for appointment of arbitral tribunal.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition conciliation agreement arbitral award

Sateesh Jain v. UCO Bank

10 Mar 2025 · Sanjeev Narula · 2025:DHC:1651
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a director who signed dishonoured cheques during his tenure remains liable under Section 138/141 NI Act despite resignation prior to cheque presentation, dismissing the petition to quash proceedings.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act director liability signatory cheque liability

Mayank Sharma v. Union of India

10 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1715-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the respondents accepted the petitioner's resignation during the pendency of proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition resignation acceptance of resignation service rules

Manash Lifestyle Private Limited v. Viraj Harjai & Anr.

10 Mar 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:2158

The Delhi High Court ordered cancellation of respondent's 'PURPLLE TREE' trademarks for dishonest adoption infringing petitioner's prior 'PURPLLE' marks, holding class distinctions immaterial in cases of deceptive similarity and unfair competition.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Trade Marks Act, 1999 Prior user rights

Lt. Col. Vikas Verma v. Union of India and Ors.

10 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2634-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a routine adjournment order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, reaffirming the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed certiorari jurisdiction Article 226 Armed Forces Tribunal interim adjournment order

Maj. Manohar Mishra v. Union of India and Ors.

10 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2632-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an adjournment order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, reaffirming the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed certiorari jurisdiction Armed Forces Tribunal Article 226 writ petition

Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Raj Belts & Ors.

10 Mar 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:2034

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and costs to Louis Vuitton against defendants selling counterfeit products, proceeding ex parte under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC relying on Local Commissioners' reports to establish trademark infringement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement well-known mark Order VIII Rule 10 CPC ex parte judgment

Sandeep Kumar and Others v. Union of India and Others

10 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:5302-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioners' statutory appeal against dismissal from service within four weeks, ensuring expeditious disposal and preserving the right to challenge any adverse decision.

administrative petition_allowed statutory appeal dismissal from service reasonable time writ petition

Bishan Narain Mehra v. M/s Fine Boot House & Ors.

07 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2076

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenants' petition challenging the dismissal of their leave to defend application, upholding the landlord's bona fide need for eviction and confirming the correction of typographical errors in the eviction order.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide requirement leave to defend eviction petition alternate accommodation

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited v. State of NCT of Delhi

07 Mar 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1803

The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order and charge-sheet filed after an inordinate delay beyond the limitation period under Section 139 Electricity Act and Section 336 IPC, holding that the delay was not satisfactorily explained nor in the interest of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay limitation period Section 139 Electricity Act Section 336 IPC

State v. Sachin

07 Mar 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:1501
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal in a child sexual offence case due to material contradictions in the sole eye witness's testimony and lack of corroboration, upholding the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant acquittal leave to appeal Section 378 CrPC Section 354B IPC