Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

ST ENGINEERING AEROSPACE ENGINES PTE LTD v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR

12 Mar 2025 · DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA · 2025:DHC:1726-DB

Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notices issued without valid service to a Singapore-based assessee and remitted the matter for fresh consideration, emphasizing the requirement of proper notice and opportunity under the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Reassessment proceedings

Bale Ram Kashyap v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Mar 2025 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2025:DHC:1750

The High Court dismissed the second appeal for lack of any substantial question of law, upholding the concurrent factual findings of the lower courts regarding the appellant's claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Section 100 CPC Regular Second Appeal substantial question of law concurrent findings of fact

Ram Kumar v. CBI

12 Mar 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:1619

The Delhi High Court acquitted police officers convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to unreliable video evidence and failure to prove demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act demand and acceptance of bribe video evidence admissibility Section 65B Indian Evidence Act

Sushil Kumar Alias Raju v. State

12 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:1612-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable dying declaration, incomplete circumstantial evidence, and insufficient proof that burn injuries caused death.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC circumstantial evidence septicaemia

Meghraj Singh v. CBI

12 Mar 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:1618

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a corruption case due to failure of prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt and unreliability of video evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7 PC Act Section 13(1)(d) PC Act video evidence

Satish Kumar v. C.B.I

12 Mar 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:1623

The Delhi High Court acquitted a police constable in a corruption case due to failure of prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt, highlighting the necessity of authentic video evidence and examination of key witnesses.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7 Section 13(1)(d) Section 13(2)

Vijay Pal v. C.B.I

12 Mar 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:1625

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a corruption case due to insufficient proof of demand and acceptance of bribe and inadmissibility of video evidence lacking proper certification.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 PC Act Section 13(1)(d) PC Act video evidence admissibility

United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Vinod Kumar Sinha & Ors

12 Mar 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:1699

Delhi High Court upheld ₹15,000 monthly notional income for deceased engineering student but reduced future prospects addition from 50% to 40% in motor accident compensation, aligning with Supreme Court precedent.

civil appeal_allowed Significant notional income future prospects motor accident compensation deceased student

ZYNC GLOBAL PRIVATE LIMITED v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

12 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1705

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the 'fraud' classification of a loan account as not pressed, granted liberty to file a fresh petition, and restrained the Bank from taking precipitative action for four weeks.

civil petition_dismissed loan account classification fraud classification writ petition Punjab National Bank

Dr. Raman Preet Grover v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

12 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1646-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be calculated from the date of retirement, modifying the Tribunal's order accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant retiral benefits interest on delayed payment superannuation Central Administrative Tribunal

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & Ors. v. Banarsi Dass

12 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · (2008) 154 DLT 463 (DB)
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's non-speaking order allowing medical reimbursement claims without addressing limitation and entitlement, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical reimbursement limitation Central Administrative Tribunal de novo consideration

Sarvinder Kumar Saini v. Om Prakash

12 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1679

The Delhi High Court granted the tenant an extension to vacate premises subject to an affidavit undertaking and payment of user charges, staying eviction until 31.03.2025.

property appeal_allowed eviction user and occupation charges extension of time undertaking

M/S B BRAUN MEDICAL INDIA PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

12 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:1656-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed Input Tax Credit to a petitioner despite clerical errors in GST numbers on invoices, holding that such minor errors do not disentitle the credit if the transaction is genuine.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Input Tax Credit GST clerical error incorrect GST number

Court on Its Own Motion v. Shivashish Gunwal

12 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:1657-DB

The Delhi High Court accepted an advocate's unconditional apology for courtroom misconduct amounting to contempt and discharged him subject to rendering pro bono legal services.

criminal petition_dismissed contempt of court courtroom decorum advocate misconduct unconditional apology

Rahul Kumar Verma v. Badminton Association of India

12 Mar 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:1668

The Delhi High Court held that the Badminton Association of India's selection criteria discriminated against female para-athletes and directed augmentation of female participation slots to ensure gender parity and inclusivity in the Khelo India Para Games.

administrative petition_allowed Significant gender discrimination para-athletes national sports development code Khelo India Scheme

Shish Ram & Anr v. Govind Vashish

12 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:1663

The Delhi High Court stayed the execution of an eviction order until 30.09.2025 on the basis of an amicable settlement, subject to the petitioners' undertaking to pay user charges and vacate the premises by the stipulated date.

civil appeal_allowed eviction order stay of execution user and occupation charges vacant possession

Prashant Kumar v. Union of India

12 Mar 2025 · Navin Chawla; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:1634-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition challenging a marginally deficient height measurement in a police recruitment PST, directing remeasurement and permitting the petitioner to participate in the next examination batch if standards are met.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Physical Standard Test height measurement Sub-Inspector recruitment Delhi Police

M/S PC JAIN TEXTILE PVT LTD v. SH. SHYAM SUNDER SURI AND ANR

12 Mar 2025 · Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:1649

The Delhi High Court allowed defendants leave to defend a summary suit for rent recovery, conditioning it on deposit of admitted outstanding rent, holding that unregistered lease deeds may be used for collateral purposes and limitation is a triable issue.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend summary suit unregistered lease deed

Rahul Gulati v. Jyotsna Gulati

12 Mar 2025 · Navin Chawla; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:1644-DB

The Delhi High Court modified a Family Court order granting overnight visitation to restrict the respondent's access to daytime visitation only, prioritizing the children's welfare after a prolonged absence of overnight stays.

family appeal_dismissed custody visitation rights overnight visitation child welfare

Mercedes-Benz Group AG v. Minda Corporation Limited

12 Mar 2025 · Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:1631

The Delhi High Court enforced a foreign arbitral consent award against Minda Corporation, rejecting objections of double recovery and FEMA violations, emphasizing narrow interpretation of public policy exceptions under Section 48 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Arbitral Award Enforcement Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 48