Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
Chandan Bhatia v. Satish Singhal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s order striking off the petitioner’s defense without a fresh show cause notice, as per prior directions, and dismissed the petition under Article 227.
Sombir v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition including additional challenges arising after the original filing.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG & Anr. v. Natco Pharma Limited
The Delhi High Court clarified the appearances of counsel for interveners in interlocutory applications related to a commercial suit without addressing substantive issues.
Bridgestone Corporation v. M/S. Merlin Rubber
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and compensatory damages to Bridgestone Corporation against Merlin Rubber for deliberate trademark infringement and passing off using the deceptively similar mark 'BRIMESTONE'.
Delco Infrastructure Projects Ltd & Ors. v. Intec Capital Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 467-day delay in filing an appeal against an arbitral award, emphasizing strict adherence to timelines and requiring genuine sufficient cause for delay in commercial arbitration matters.
Shushant Muttreja & Anr v. Ram Kumar Rathi & Anr
The High Court held that a suit against a company in liquidation cannot proceed without leave of the Company Court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, and directors are not personally liable absent guarantees or fraud, setting aside the Trial Court's order allowing the suit to continue against the directors.
Raj Kumar v. Darshan Chawla
The High Court dismissed the second appeal, upholding concurrent findings of fact that the plaintiff proved a loan transaction supported by an acknowledgment receipt and bank evidence, entitling recovery with interest.
Delhi Development Authority v. Kalu Ram @ Kalu & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the injunction protecting respondents' possession against forcible dispossession by DDA, emphasizing the necessity of due process and limiting adjudication of title in injunction suits.
Chetan Nagi v. Ashwani Kumar Chaddha and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant’s revision petition, holding that delay in filing leave to defend beyond the statutory period under the Delhi Rent Control Act was not condonable and upheld the eviction order on bona fide need grounds.
Ascot Hotel & Resorts Ltd and Anr v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition partially, directing the petitioners to pay outstanding dues with concessional interest during litigation but upheld the contractual interest rate and recovery certificate terms for enforcement upon default.
Pratistha Garg v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 25 Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment proceedings initiated under a second Section 148 notice beyond the limitation period are invalid and set aside such proceedings, emphasizing strict compliance with limitation and procedural requirements under the Income Tax Act.
M/S DELCO INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS PVT. LTD & Ors. v. INTEC CAPITAL LIMITED & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking condonation of a 468-day delay in challenging a dismissal order under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act, holding that the appellants failed to show sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal.
National Highways Authority of India v. M/S C.P. Rama Rao Proprietor
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal to remand the matter for reconsideration of the appellant's counter-claim which was rejected without reasons in the arbitral award and upheld by the Single Judge.
Valmik Thapar v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 18
Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment under Section 148 does not survive if the reasons recorded for reopening are not sustained and no additions are made on those grounds.
Gurdeep Singh v. Jitender Pal Singh Narang & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of leave to defend in an eviction petition based on bona fide requirement, holding that a prima facie triable issue was raised regarding alternate accommodation and landlord's need.
Moonwalk Infra Projects Pvt Ltd v. S.R Constructions & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration clause specifying Delhi as the venue constitutes the seat of arbitration, conferring jurisdiction on it despite a generic jurisdiction clause in the purchase order favoring Begusarai courts, and appointed an arbitrator accordingly.
Shushant Muttreja & Anr v. Vinod Yadav
The High Court held that suits against a company under winding up require leave of the Company Court and directors are not personally liable absent guarantees or fraud, setting aside the Trial Court's order allowing the suit to proceed against directors without such leave.
Shushant Muttreja & Anr v. Ram Kumar Rathi & Anr
The High Court held that suits against a company under winding up cannot proceed without leave of the Company Court, and directors are not personally liable absent guarantees or fraud, directing the trial court to re-examine the suit's maintainability accordingly.
Shushant Muttreja & Anr v. Ram Kumar Rathi & Anr
The High Court held that suits against a company under winding up cannot proceed without leave of the Company Court, and directors are personally liable only if guarantees or fraud are pleaded, setting aside the Trial Court's order and remanding for fresh consideration.
Shekhar Muttreja & Anr v. Peeyosh Aggarwal
The High Court held that suits against a company in liquidation cannot proceed without leave under Section 446 of the Companies Act and directors are not personally liable absent guarantees or fraud, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.