Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Warm Forgings Pvt Ltd v. Reckon Industries Ltd

25 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1992

The High Court allowed the petitioner to lead one defense witness after closure of evidence subject to affidavit filing and costs, directing the Trial Court to record evidence and dispose of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed right to lead evidence closure of evidence commercial suit affidavit

The Oriental Ins. Co. Ltd. v. Kamla Devi & Ors.

25 Mar 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:1986

The Delhi High Court held that an insurer is liable to pay penalty under Section 4A(3)(b) of the Employees’ Compensation Act if an additional premium for employee liability is paid under the insurance policy.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4A penalty insurance liability additional premium

M/S SHELLZ INDIA PVT. LTD. v. M/S HBD PACKAGING PVT LTD

25 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1996

The Delhi High Court allowed the defendant's petition to take on record a delayed written statement filed within 120 days, imposed costs for delay, and directed the trial court to avoid unnecessary adjournments.

civil petition_allowed written statement condonation of delay commercial suit striking off defense

Sh Rajesh Kumar Sharma v. Rajesh Gupta and Anr

25 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2001
Cites 3 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the NCDRC's discretionary condonation of delay in filing a consumer appeal, dismissing the petition challenging the order under Article 227 for lack of illegality or perversity.

civil petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay consumer protection Article 227 discretionary power

Chandra Shekhar Bhardwaj v. Maj. (Retd.) K.R. Suri

25 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2002

The Delhi High Court held that an interim stay order passed during an appeal merges with the final appellate order, and once the appeal is dismissed on merits, the appropriate remedy is to challenge the final order, not the interim order under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India interim order stay order merger of interim order

Delhi Technological University v. Rahul Bansal

25 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2004

The Delhi High Court allowed the defendant-University to file a delayed written statement within 120 days, restored its struck-off defence, and imposed costs for the delay.

civil appeal_allowed Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 151 CPC written statement condonation of delay

Dr. Subhash Vijayran v. Dr. Sreenivas Madireddy & Anr.

25 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2005

The High Court requested the First Appellate Court to expedite disposal of a pending appeal involving only legal issues, without issuing a formal time-bound direction.

civil other expeditious disposal appeal suo moto rejection trial court

Tilak Raj Chitkara v. Manisha Jain

25 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2006
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, restored the appeal, and imposed costs, allowing adjudication on merits.

civil appeal_allowed condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act 1963 appeal restoration possession of tenanted premises

Rachit Jain v. Neha Jain

25 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2012

The High Court dismissed as premature a petition challenging the Family Court's procedural notice on the respondent's application to reopen cross-examination in a divorce proceeding.

family petition_dismissed divorce cruelty cross-examination Section 151 CPC

Nampal Singh & Anr. v. Sh Ramesh Chand

25 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2013

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing a written statement in a regular suit, emphasizing adjudication on merits over procedural technicalities, while imposing costs for the delay.

civil appeal_allowed Significant written statement condonation of delay Order VIII Rule 1 CPC regular suit

Ram Babu Gautam v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

25 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:1987-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the removal of street vendors without prior notice, holding that mobile vendors with temporary certificates have no permanent rights and vendors without certificates have no protection under the Street Vendors Act.

administrative petition_dismissed Street Vendors Act 2014 temporary vending certificate mobile vendor prior notice

Sohnu Mohan v. Ramona Jind & Ors.

25 Mar 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:1940
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an unmarried daughter studying abroad is entitled to maintenance from her father under Hindu law, and if the father fails, the HUF property managed by the karta grandfather can be charged for her maintenance, while a letter of comfort does not constitute an enforceable guarantee.

family appeal_allowed Significant maintenance Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 Section 20 contract of guarantee

M/S WIDE IMPEX v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS IMPORT & ANR.

25 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2018-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal of the Customs appeal for non-payment of mandatory pre-deposit, holding that bank guarantees for provisional release cannot be appropriated towards pre-deposit and successive litigation on the same issue is impermissible.

administrative petition_dismissed pre-deposit bank guarantee Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal appeal dismissal

Pooja Kaushik v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

25 Mar 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:1946

The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of bail due to absence of fresh supervening circumstances and upheld the principle that bail should not be cancelled mechanically without cogent reasons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail cancellation supervening circumstances Section 482 CrPC forgery

Rambir Kaushik v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

25 Mar 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:1945

The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of bail due to absence of fresh supervening circumstances and upheld the principle that bail should not be cancelled mechanically once granted.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail cancellation supervening circumstances interim protection Section 482 CrPC

Amit Rathee & Anr. v. Registrar Co-operative Societies & Ors.

25 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2032-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing allotment of a flat by accepting alternative residence proof when original documents were unavailable due to official record loss.

administrative petition_allowed Significant membership certificate cooperative housing society residence proof ration card

Shri Laxman Dass Sachdeva Memorial Educational Society v. Directorate of Higher Education Government of NCT of Delhi

25 Mar 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela

The Delhi High Court quashed fee fixation notifications downgrading private colleges without providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing, emphasizing adherence to natural justice under the 2007 Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Fee Regulatory Committee Natural Justice Reasonable Opportunity of Hearing Fee Fixation

Maggie Marketing Private Limited v. Commissioner of Customs (Export) & Anr.

25 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta

The Delhi High Court set aside the CESTAT order dismissing the appeal on limitation grounds and remanded the matter for adjudication on merits after allowing the appellants to file their reply.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 limitation show cause notice adjudication

Nitesh Kumar Singh; Laavanya Kaushik v. Pooja Jha

25 Mar 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:1978-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Government's petition challenging the CAT order directing reconsideration of candidates with valid EWS certificates despite delayed submission due to COVID-19, upholding prior orders and directing compliance.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant EWS certificate Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board Central Administrative Tribunal COVID-19 lockdown

AbbVie Biotherapeutics Inc & Anr. v. Assistant Controller of Patent Designs

25 Mar 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:2594

The Delhi High Court upheld refusal of a patent application, holding that amendments converting non-patentable method of treatment claims into broader product claims impermissibly enlarge claim scope under Section 59(1) of the Patents Act, 1970.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Patents Act 1970 Section 59(1) method of treatment product claims