Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

M/S Quantus Management System Pvt Ltd v. Delhi Development Authority

26 Mar 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:2556

The Delhi High Court held that the DDA’s forfeiture of earnest money was arbitrary due to a faulty demand notice and ordered refund of the earnest money to the petitioner.

administrative petition_allowed Significant earnest money deposit e-auction demand notice forfeiture

Shalender Chauhan v. DCP Control Room & Ors

26 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2546

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to lead additional video evidence on appeal in a motor accident claim case, emphasizing the necessity of examining such evidence to prevent miscarriage of justice.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant additional evidence YouTube video motor accident claim Section 173 Motor Vehicles Act

Kishan Yadav v. Bhaju Ram Yadav

26 Mar 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2008 (153) DLT 247

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order, ruling that ownership disputes cannot be raised by a tenant at the leave to defend stage and bona fide requirement by the landlord is a valid ground for eviction.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction bona fide requirement ownership dispute

Nathi Mal Gupta v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.

26 Mar 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:2364

The Delhi High Court held that a police notice under Section 91 CrPC does not legally bar the DDA from executing a perpetual lease deed in favor of a petitioner with undisputed title and quashed the stay on execution.

property petition_allowed Significant Section 91 CrPC perpetual lease deed Delhi Development Authority property allotment

Sanjay Kumar Sharma v. Urmila Jain

26 Mar 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:2289
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a tenant raising plausible triable issues regarding landlord's bona fide requirement and alternate accommodation is entitled to leave to defend eviction proceedings under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property appeal_allowed Significant leave to defend eviction bona fide requirement alternate accommodation

State v. Deshraj & Sunil @ Sagar @ Setty

26 Mar 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:2258

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a nighttime robbery case due to material contradictions in eyewitness identification, affirming the benefit of doubt to the accused.

criminal appeal_dismissed identification of accused benefit of doubt contradictions in prosecution evidence nighttime robbery

M/S Reliance Industries Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2194-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous a writ petition seeking enforcement of anti-dumping duty recommendations after the petitioner withdrew its claim.

administrative petition_dismissed anti-dumping duty Rule 18 Anti-Dumping Rules deemed decision Central Government notification

Sharma v. NikhIn

26 Mar 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:2031-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a fresh independent medical examination for a candidate declared unfit, emphasizing limited but justified judicial interference in medical board findings to ensure fairness.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Medical Examination Review Medical Board Judicial Interference Recruitment

Parmeshwar Kumar Bagga v. Avinash Bagga

26 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2052

The High Court upheld a consent decree passed by the Trial Court, refusing to set it aside on unsubstantiated claims of misrepresentation and coercion by the petitioner's own counsel.

civil appeal_dismissed consent decree misrepresentation coercion Article 227 Constitution of India

Ankit Bansal v. S. Paramjeet Singh Khurana

26 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain

The court held that the question of suit being barred under Section 69(3) of the Indian Partnership Act must be decided at final hearing and burden of proving dissolution of partnership lies on both parties.

civil other Procedural Partnership dissolution Unregistered partnership Section 69(3) Indian Partnership Act Order VII Rule 11 CPC

S. P. S. Chauhan v. The Oriental Insurance Company

26 Mar 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:2139
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary penalties against an insurance officer for deliberate backdating of a cover note and false statements, rejecting claims of inadvertent error and delay-based waiver.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant backdating insurance cover note disciplinary proceedings dereliction of duty

Civil Services Officers Institute v. Ranjan Kumar Rout

26 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2054

The High Court set aside the Labour Court's order directing early production of documents and allowed reconsideration after completion of the workman's evidence, disposing of the petition with parties' consent.

labor appeal_allowed Procedural Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 11(3) production of documents Labour Court

Masjid v. Joshi Road Nagrik Parishad

26 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2064

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a government gazette notification and evidence to establish Wakf status of disputed property despite earlier striking off of defence, emphasizing no undue delay in trial.

civil other Wakf property government gazette notification Order 7 Rule 11 CPC striking off defence

Arihant Jain v. Registrar Cooperative Societies & Ors.

26 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2027-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar Cooperative Societies to investigate the petitioner’s complaint against a cooperative society while allowing arbitration on payment disputes to continue independently.

administrative petition_dismissed Registrar Cooperative Societies Delhi Co-operative Societies Act Article 226 arbitration

Vedanta Limited v. Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs & Ors.

26 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2029-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the CBIC to reconsider Vedanta Limited’s duty drawback claims including clean energy cess under Instruction No. 4/2019 and pass a reasoned order on relaxation of limitation.

tax other Significant duty drawback clean energy cess brand rate limitation period

Mamta Kashyap & Ors. v. Union of India

26 Mar 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:2026

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking compensation for death caused by self-inflicted injuries while attempting to alight from a moving train, holding no liability under the Railways Act, 1989.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 Section 124-A untoward incident

Mithlesh & Ors. v. Union of India

26 Mar 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:2025

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and awarded compensation to the deceased's family, holding that the death occurred due to an untoward incident during lawful railway travel and the railway failed to prove exemption under Section 124-A.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1989 Railways Act, 1989 Section 124-A exemption untoward incident

WANNAMO MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED v. HOUSE OF FITNESS PRIVATE LIMITED

26 Mar 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:2117

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a Service Agreement, holding that the arbitration clause covers the dispute and the petitioner complied with the conciliation requirement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause appointment of arbitrator conciliation period arbitrability

M/S Punj Sons P. Ltd. v. UOI & Anr.

26 Mar 2025 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2025:DHC:1985
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Chief Settlement Commissioner’s 2004 order applying commercial rates for land regularization, rejecting the petitioner’s claim based on a lapsed 1978 offer and holding that doctrines of legitimate expectation and promissory estoppel do not confer enforceable rights against government policy revisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant land regularization unauthorized occupation legitimate expectation promissory estoppel

Ratnesh Kumar Mishra & Ors. v. Union of India Through Secretary Higher Education & Ors.

26 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2072-DB

The Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to file a corrected fresh petition, while expressing doubts on maintainability in light of Supreme Court precedent.

constitutional appeal_allowed writ petition withdrawal maintainability L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India