Delhi High Court

36,666 judgments

Year:

Ashok Swain v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Mar 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:2105

The Delhi High Court set aside the OCI cancellation order for lack of procedural fairness and directed the authorities to provide specific allegations and material to the petitioner before passing a fresh reasoned order under Section 7-D(e) of the Citizenship Act, 1955.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant OCI card cancellation Section 7-D Citizenship Act natural justice reasonable opportunity of hearing

Kanon Evarad v. State of NCT of Delhi

28 Mar 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:2077

Bail application of a foreign national accused of large-scale cyber fraud was dismissed as procedural requirements for arrest were met and the gravity of offences precluded bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail application grounds of arrest Article 22 Constitution of India Section 50 CrPC

National Restaurant Association of India & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

28 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh

The Delhi High Court upheld CCPA guidelines prohibiting mandatory service charges by restaurants, affirming that such charges must be voluntary and clearly disclosed to consumers.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant Service Charge Consumer Protection Act 2019 Central Consumer Protection Authority Unfair Trade Practice

Construcciones Y Auxiliar De Ferrocarriles v. Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited

28 Mar 2025 · Jasmeet Singh

The Delhi High Court upheld enforcement of a foreign arbitral award, holding that compensation for breach of warranty under Indian law requires proof of actual loss and that enforcement courts cannot reappraise merits or evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Enforcement of foreign arbitral award Section 48 Public policy of India

Sunita Kumari Jat v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3186-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to decide the petitioner's transfer representation with a reasoned order and stayed enforcement of the adverse transfer pending such decision, emphasizing family life protection under Article 21.

administrative other Significant transfer order posting near spouse Office Memorandum 2009 Article 21

Sh Azhar Ahmed v. Union of India & Others

27 Mar 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:1089-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed rectification of a typographical error in its earlier judgment to correctly reflect the ownership of land purchased by the petitioner’s father.

civil other rectification typographical error judgment correction sale deed

Anand Ram v. Union of India & Ors.

27 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1485-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court remanded the petitioner's claim for Old Pension Scheme benefits to the Tribunal for fresh consideration on delay and merits, while upholding dismissal of the regularisation claim as time-barred.

administrative appeal_allowed Central Administrative Tribunal Old Pension Scheme regularisation delay

Union of India v. Ex. MWO Satyapal Singh Sharma

27 Mar 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2335-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to an ex-serviceman, affirming that disabilities detected during service are presumed attributable to military service unless cogent reasons prove otherwise.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension military service Release Medical Board service attribution

MRS. RANI KAPOOR & ORS. v. M/S. COMPUTER SYSTEMS & MNGT. CONS. PRIVATE LIMITED

27 Mar 2025 · Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:2445
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted ejectment and recovery of possession under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC against a tenant who failed to file a written statement and repeatedly defaulted on rent and court orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VIII Rule 10 CPC ejectment recovery of possession unauthorized occupation

State Bank of India v. Saurabh Garg & Ors.

27 Mar 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:2545

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition under Section 115 CPC, upholding the trial court's refusal to grant additional time to lead evidence, holding that interim orders not finally disposing of the suit are not revisable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision petition interim order leading evidence

SI Ramawati v. Kapil Nogia

27 Mar 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:2602
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a rape and blackmail case, holding that the prosecutrix's relationship with the accused was consensual and prosecution failed to prove absence of consent beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape consent sexual harassment blackmail

Sita Ram & Son v. Manoj Kumar Jain

27 Mar 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:2323

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order against a tenant who failed to file leave to defend application within the statutory period despite being duly served summons, affirming the bona fide requirement of the landlord under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property appeal_dismissed Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction bona fide requirement leave to defend

M.K Kamboj v. Brijesh Arya

27 Mar 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:2291-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal in a commercial recovery suit, affirming that part payment extended limitation, territorial jurisdiction lay in Delhi, and unproven claims of returned goods did not reduce the defendant's liability.

civil appeal_dismissed limitation territorial jurisdiction part payment commercial suit

Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Shravan Kumar Bansal, Mr. Deepak Srivastava, Mr. Risabh Gupta and Ms. Ridhie Bajaj v. Lakha Ram Sharma Proprietor of Kundan Cable India

27 Mar 2025 · Amit Bansal, J. · 2025:DHC:2322
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act mandates stay only in trademark infringement suits and not in passing off suits, setting aside the Trial Court's stay order based on obiter dicta in a prior Division Bench judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 124 Trade Marks Act passing off trademark infringement stay of proceedings

Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v. Sanvik Coresoft LLP

27 Mar 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:2215

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and ancillary reliefs to Sandvik Intellectual Property AB against Sanvik Coresoft LLP for trademark infringement and passing off of the 'SANDVIK' mark.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Permanent injunction Deceptive similarity

Principal Commissioner of Customs v. M/SGO IP Global Services Pvt. Ltd

27 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2078-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the phrase 'MIMO and LTE Products' in a customs exemption notification must be read conjunctively, limiting exemption to products combining both technologies, and dismissed the appeal challenging this interpretation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 130G MIMO and LTE Products Statutory interpretation

M/S CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. PRABHSIMRAN SINGH PROPRIETOR OF M/S THE PRESTIGE MOTORS

27 Mar 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:2147

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under a valid arbitration clause to adjudicate a credit dispute, emphasizing the court's limited role and proper service of notice.

civil petition_allowed arbitration clause appointment of arbitrator Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12 disclosure

The Commissioner of Central Tax, CGST Delhi East v. M/S Simplex Infrastructure Limited

27 Mar 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Rajneesh Kumar Gupta · 2025:DHC:2082-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CESTAT's decision dismissing the Department's appeal, holding that the extended limitation period for service tax demand cannot be invoked absent fraud or suppression when the taxpayer had a bona fide belief of non-liability.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant service tax extended limitation period Section 73(1) Finance Act 1994 bona fide belief

Avika Shahi and Anr v. Medical Counselling Committee and Ors

27 Mar 2025 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2025:DHC:2096
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the revised CW seat conversion algorithm in NEET-UG 2024 counselling, upholding its constitutional validity and denying relief to petitioners seeking MBBS admission under the CW quota.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant NEET-UG 2024 Children/Widows of Armed Forces (CW) category Reservation policy Seat conversion algorithm

Sh Satbir Singh v. MS Versatile Commotrade Private Limited

27 Mar 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:2094

The Delhi High Court declined to interfere under Article 227 with an arbitrator's order refusing to summon witnesses, directing the arbitrator to decide the pending recall application expeditiously and reserving the petitioner's right to approach the Court thereafter.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India supervisory jurisdiction arbitral proceedings sole arbitrator