Delhi High Court
93,075 judgments
Subha Kumar Dash v. Delhi University and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous a writ petition challenging a suspension order after the order was withdrawn by the authority before the hearing.
Tara Chand v. Land & Building Department
The Delhi High Court condoned the petitioner's delay in filing an affidavit due to court vacations and directed the respondent to consider his application for an alternative plot on merits.
IFCI FACTORS LTD. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Delhi High Court held that courts have territorial jurisdiction under Section 138 NI Act only where the cheque is dishonoured at the home branch of the drawee bank, and presentation of multi-city cheques at other branches does not confer jurisdiction.
IFCI FACTORS LTD. v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints based on multi-city cheques presented at non-home branches; jurisdiction lies only where the cheque is dishonoured by the drawee bank's home branch.
Neelam Kapur v. Ashok David and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the contempt petition after respondents complied with the court order by releasing the pension amount and assuring regular future payments to the petitioner.
Poonam Khadia v. Air India Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed Air India to provide transport as per service rules and declined to quash the charge sheet issued to the petitioner, leaving the matter to be decided on merits.
Shiv Kumar and Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning delay in notifying Recruitment Rules for TGT (Special Educators) based on the respondents' undertaking to complete notification within six weeks, subject to consequences for non-compliance.
Bijay Kumar Verma v. Consortium for Educational Communication & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw his writ petition challenging termination and directed him to pursue dispute resolution through the contractual arbitration clause.
Rajender Kuamr Tyagi & Anr. v. Director of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions by recording a binding settlement agreement reached through court-referred mediation, directing payment to the petitioner upon acceptance of his VRS application.
Sulaxna Mary v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences
The Delhi High Court held that service-related disputes involving AIIMS must be adjudicated by the Central Administrative Tribunal and dismissed the writ petition while granting interim protection against coercive action on the transfer order.
S. Thakran v. Indraprastha Power Generation Co. Ltd and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an employee relieved from service is entitled to salary up to the relief date and pension thereafter, directing payment of arrears with interest and rejecting employer's procedural objections.
Shri Daya Chand v. The Assessing Officer (Enforcement) BSES Rajdhani Power Limited
The High Court upheld the trial court's order setting aside the ex parte decree due to counsel's negligence and the petitioner's failure to dispute the respondent's application, dismissing the appeal under Section 115 CPC.
M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. M/S BSCPL
The Delhi High Court upheld arbitral awards holding that price adjustment factors under the contract must be calculated based on actual procurement costs as per IPCs, rejecting the petitioner's unilateral change of contract interpretation and refusal to interfere absent public policy violation.
Jawahar Singh v. State
Delhi High Court overturned acquittal and convicted accused for murder based on credible last seen evidence, motive, recovery of firearm, and absconsion, clarifying principles on appellate review and admissibility of recovery evidence.
Jawahar Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal of Ravi Sharma for murder, holding that motive, recovery of the weapon, and absconding conduct proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite procedural lapses in recovery.
Jeet Singh @ Jeetu & Anr. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction of Jeet Singh and Kalu based on credible eyewitness testimony and corroborative evidence, rejecting pleas of juvenility and alibi.
Shamsuddin v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and acquitted the appellant after the parties settled the electricity theft case through mediation, leading to compounding of the offence under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003.
Good Luck Traders v. State & Ors.
Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints based on multi-city payable at par cheques dishonoured outside the home branch of the drawee bank.
Good Luck Traders v. State
Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction under Section 138 NI Act lies only where the cheque is dishonoured by the drawee bank branch maintaining the account, and multi-city cheque presentation at other branches does not confer jurisdiction.
Good Luck Traders v. State
The Delhi High Court held that courts have territorial jurisdiction under Section 138 NI Act only where the cheque is dishonoured by the drawee bank's home branch, and presentation of multi-city cheques at non-home branches does not confer jurisdiction elsewhere.