Subha Kumar Dash v. Delhi University and Ors.

Delhi High Court · 18 Dec 2014 · 2014:DHC:7215
Suresh Kait
W.P. (C) 8973/2014
2014:DHC:7215
administrative petition_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous a writ petition challenging a suspension order after the order was withdrawn by the authority before the hearing.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P. (C) 8973/2014
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
delivered on: 18th December, 2014
W.P.(C) 8973/2014
SUBHA KUMAR DASH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr. Sunil J. Mathews, Ms. Shikha Pandey and Ms. Reeja Varghese, Advs.
versus
DELHI UNIVERSITY AND ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: Mr. Yanmi Phazang, Adv. for Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Adv. for R1.
Mr. Mariar Putham, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Romy Chacko, Adv. for R2 to R4.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT
SURESH KAIT, J. (Oral)
CM. No.20519/2014 (for exemption)
Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the application is allowed.
W.P.(C) 8973/2014

1. Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks setting aside the suspension order dated 11.12.2014 and prohibiting the respondent nos. 2 to 4 from taking any further actions against the petitioner. 2014:DHC:7215 W.P. (C) 8973/2014

2. Mr. Mariar Putham, Ld. Sr. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents noted above on advance notice submits that the suspension order dated 10.12.2014 has been withdrawn on 17.12.2014 and this fact has been conveyed to the petitioner.

3. In view of above, issue raised in the instant petition has become infructuous.

4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as infructuous. CM. No.20518/2014 (for Stay) With the dismissal of the present petition, instant application has become infructuous and dismissed as such.

SURESH KAIT, J DECEMBER 18, 2014 jg