Delhi High Court

93,075 judgments

Year:

M/S ADITYA PROMOTERS LTD. v. SHRI S. KARTHIKEYAN

17 Dec 2014 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2014:DHC:7201

The Delhi High Court held that prosecution under Section 138 NI Act lies only in the court where the cheque is dishonoured, and presentation of a multi-city cheque at a non-home branch does not confer territorial jurisdiction.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act territorial jurisdiction payable at par cheque multi-city cheque

Prahlad v. State

17 Dec 2014 · Pratibha Rani · 2014:DHC:7191

The Delhi High Court modified the conviction from rape under Section 376 IPC to attempt to commit rape under Section 376/511 IPC due to lack of conclusive medical evidence of penetration, reducing the sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape attempt to commit rape Section 376 IPC Section 511 IPC

Kulvir Singh v. Union of India

17 Dec 2014 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2014:DHC:7192

The Delhi High Court held that applying for political asylum abroad does not justify denial of passports under Section 6(1)(a) of the Passports Act, 1967, and directed issuance of passports to petitioners.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Passports Act 1967 Section 6(1)(a) political asylum sovereignty and integrity of India

Kulvir Singh v. Union of India

17 Dec 2014 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2014:DHC:7193

The Delhi High Court held that applying for political asylum abroad does not justify denial of passports under Section 6(1)(a) of the Passports Act, 1967, and set aside orders placing petitioners under the Prior Approval Category.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Passports Act, 1967 Section 6(1)(a) Political asylum Sovereignty and integrity of India

M/S NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. M/S BSCPL

17 Dec 2014 · Deepa Sharma · 2014:DHC:7199

The Delhi High Court upheld arbitral awards holding that price adjustment factors must be calculated based on actual procurement costs as per contract terms and that unilateral post-facto reinterpretation by the employer is impermissible.

civil petition_dismissed Significant price adjustment formula contract interpretation arbitral award unilateral change

Kulvir Singh v. Union of India

17 Dec 2014 · Vibhu BakhrU, J · 2014:DHC:7188

The Delhi High Court held that applying for political asylum abroad does not justify denial of passports under Section 6(1)(a) of the Passports Act, 1967, and set aside orders placing petitioners under the Prior Approval Category.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Passports Act, 1967 Section 6(1)(a) political asylum sovereignty and integrity of India

Vendee Builders Private Limited v. Sungrace Products (India) Private Limited

17 Dec 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:7197

The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors based on their written consents and absence of creditors.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 dispensation of meetings

Delhi Development Authority v. M/S. N.R.B.ASSOCIATES AND ORS.

17 Dec 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:7195

The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of actual expenses incurred by the plaintiff in completing contract work left unfinished by the defendants, holding them liable for damages and interest due to breach and rescission of contract.

civil appeal_dismissed contract rescission breach of contract cost of cure damages

Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd. v. Asstt. Director, Enforcement of Directorate

17 Dec 2014 · Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:7187

The High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner’s appeal and review petition for non-compliance with mandatory pre-deposit requirements under FERA, affirming that review powers are limited to procedural errors and do not permit re-hearing on merits.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 pre-deposit of penalty appellate authority procedural review

Jai Ram @ Vicky v. State

17 Dec 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:7196-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Jai Ram @ Vicky for murder based on strong circumstantial evidence including call records and mobile phone recovery, dismissing his appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence mobile phone call records Section 302 IPC post-mortem report

Vijender Singh v. State

17 Dec 2014 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2014:DHC:7202

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act case due to unexplained delay in FIR and interested witnesses, holding that investigation irregularities without prejudice do not vitiate conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(X) Section 3(2)(VII) investigation irregularity

Rajbir Chikkara v. Gurusevak Motor & General Finance Pvt. Ltd. & Anr

16 Dec 2014 · Indermeet Kaur · 2014:DHC:7503

The Delhi High Court allowed compounding of a cheque dishonour offence at the appellate stage upon settlement, acquitted the petitioner, and mandated payment of 15% of the principal amount as State compensation per Supreme Court precedent.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant compoundable offence Negotiable Instruments Act cheque dishonour compounding at appellate stage

Ram Sajiwan Saroj v. Union of India

16 Dec 2014 · A. K. Pathak · 2014:DHC:7080

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's claim for railway injury compensation under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, holding that he failed to prove he was a bona fide passenger injured in an untoward incident.

civil appeal_dismissed Railways Act 1989 Section 124-A untoward incident compensation claim

Satpal v. State & Ors.

16 Dec 2014 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2014:DHC:7103

The Delhi High Court allowed a revision petition under its inherent powers to set aside an acquittal order caused by procedural irregularities in cross FIRs arising from a family dispute, directing retrial of both cases together.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant revision petition order of acquittal Section 482 Cr.P.C. inherent powers

Adesh Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Dec 2014 · Vibhu Bakhru, J · 2014:DHC:7073

The Delhi High Court held that denial of information under Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act requires a specific demonstration that disclosure would impede prosecution, and set aside the CIC's order for fresh consideration.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 8(1)(h) denial of information impede prosecution

Bal Kishan v. Department of PFA Govt of NCT of Delhi

16 Dec 2014 · S. Muralidhar · 2014:DHC:7079
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of food adulteration charges due to non-representative test samples despite presence of argemone oil, emphasizing strict liability but requiring reliable evidence of adulteration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Food Adulteration Act argemone oil food adulteration strict liability

MCD General Mazdoor Union v. MCD

16 Dec 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:7097

The Delhi High Court delivered an oral judgment in a labor-related writ petition filed by the MCD General Mazdoor Union against the Municipal Corporation of Delhi on 16th December 2014.

labor other MCD General Mazdoor Union Municipal Corporation of Delhi writ petition labor dispute

SanDisk Corporation v. M/S Shivji Electronics & Ors.

16 Dec 2014 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2014:DHC:7166

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and punitive damages against defendants selling counterfeit SanDisk products, affirming trademark infringement and passing off in unchallenged ex-parte proceedings.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction punitive damages

Sukh Devi Jain & Ors. v. Davinder Sethi

16 Dec 2014 · Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:7122

The Delhi High Court allowed appeals restoring eviction suits, holding that transfer restrictions under the Delhi Lands Act do not bar suits if possession is not taken and compensation not paid under the Land Acquisition Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act Delhi Lands (Restrictions on Transfer) Act, 1972 eviction suit physical possession

IFCI Factors Ltd. v. State of NCT of Delhi

16 Dec 2014 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2014:DHC:7154

Delhi courts lack territorial jurisdiction to try Section 138 NI Act complaints based solely on presentation of multi-city cheques at their branches; jurisdiction lies only where the drawee bank's home branch is situated.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act territorial jurisdiction payable at par cheque multi-city cheque